Chapter Six MOTIVATION IN ORGANIZATIONS 1 Motivation Energizes

  • Slides: 32
Download presentation
Chapter Six MOTIVATION IN ORGANIZATIONS 1

Chapter Six MOTIVATION IN ORGANIZATIONS 1

Motivation Energizes Behavior Drives Compulsions Deprivation/ Disequilibrium Equilibrium Satisfaction Directs Behavior Goals Organization of

Motivation Energizes Behavior Drives Compulsions Deprivation/ Disequilibrium Equilibrium Satisfaction Directs Behavior Goals Organization of Effort Reaching Equilibrium Need Drive Sustains Behavior Maintaining motivation Persistance Ability to change course Importance of Feedback

Arousal Motivation: Its Basic Components Direction Maintenance Goal t Persis Desire to make a

Arousal Motivation: Its Basic Components Direction Maintenance Goal t Persis Desire to make a good impression t wo n e m i l mp rk Co Work extra hard Do spe cial fav ors Persist Persis Good impression made t 3

Need Theories: A Comparison Growth needs 5. Self-actualization needs 4. Esteem needs • Growth

Need Theories: A Comparison Growth needs 5. Self-actualization needs 4. Esteem needs • Growth needs Deficiency Needs 3. Social needs 2. Safety needs • Relatedness needs • Existence needs 1. Physiological needs Maslow’s need hierarchy theory Alderfer’s ERG theory 4

ERG Theory (Aldefer) Relatedness Needs Existence Needs Growth Needs Satisfaction/Progression Frustration/Regression Satisfaction/Strengthening

ERG Theory (Aldefer) Relatedness Needs Existence Needs Growth Needs Satisfaction/Progression Frustration/Regression Satisfaction/Strengthening

Discussion: Considering these theories, how might companies motive their employees • What types of

Discussion: Considering these theories, how might companies motive their employees • What types of incentives would motivate employees • How can employers satisfy employees’ needs • Would the same type of incentives or rewards satisfy all employees?

Goal Setting People’s Behavior is Guided by Intentions • Goals provide direction Specific goals

Goal Setting People’s Behavior is Guided by Intentions • Goals provide direction Specific goals are more effective • Goals mobilize behavior Difficult goals generate more effort • Feedback about goal attainment sustains behavior.

GOAL SETTING: SOME IMPRESSIVE EFFECTS Percentage of Maximum Weight Carried on Each Trip 100

GOAL SETTING: SOME IMPRESSIVE EFFECTS Percentage of Maximum Weight Carried on Each Trip 100 94 90 Performance at the goal level was sustained seven years after the goal was first set 80 70 60 There was a dramatic improvement in performance after a goal was set 50 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Before goal After Goal Seven Years Later Four-Week Periods 11

Goal Commitment Publically stated goals + High n. Ach + Internal Locus of Control

Goal Commitment Publically stated goals + High n. Ach + Internal Locus of Control Commitment to Goals

Goal Setting Applications • Management by Objectives (MBO) – Performance review procedure by which

Goal Setting Applications • Management by Objectives (MBO) – Performance review procedure by which employees and managers jointly make goals for next review period. They also work out the details for reaching those goals. Performance is regularly monitored. • Organizational Behavioral Management (OBM) (remember learning theory? ) – Application of goal setting (or other behavioral science technology) to change the behavior of large units within the organization • Logging example

Distributive Justice: Perceptions of how fairly rewards are distributed Theory 1: Exchange Theory If

Distributive Justice: Perceptions of how fairly rewards are distributed Theory 1: Exchange Theory If Inputs = Outputs Effort, Motivation, Performance, Skills, Expertise Rewards Bonus Promotions Pay Raise Recognition Satisfaction O I =1

Theory 2: Equity Theory -Compare I/O ratios to others Self Other Outcome = Input

Theory 2: Equity Theory -Compare I/O ratios to others Self Other Outcome = Input Satisfaction

Examples of Equity 1. Self Other 4 4 3. Self 2. Self Other 4

Examples of Equity 1. Self Other 4 4 3. Self 2. Self Other 4 4 8 Other 4. Self Other 5. Self Other 4 4 4 8 2 4 2 2 2 4 4 8

Examples of Inequity 1. Underpayment = Self O/I < Other O/I Example Self 4

Examples of Inequity 1. Underpayment = Self O/I < Other O/I Example Self 4 4 Other 8 4 2. Overpayment = Self O/I < Other O/I Example Self 4 4 Other 2 4

POSSIBLE REACTIONS TO INEQUITY: A SUMMARY TYPE OF REACTION Behavioral (what you can do

POSSIBLE REACTIONS TO INEQUITY: A SUMMARY TYPE OF REACTION Behavioral (what you can do is. . . ) Psychological (what you can think is. . . ) Overpayment inequity Raise your inputs (e. g. , work harder), or lower your outcomes (e. g. work through a paid vacation) Convince yourself that your outcomes are deserved based on your inputs (e. g. , rationalize that you work harder than others and so you deserve more pay) Underpayment inequity Lower your inputs (e. g. , reduce effort), or raise your outcomes e. g. , get a raise in pay) Convince yourself that others’ inputs are really higher than your own (e. g. , rationalize that the comparison worker is really more qualified and so deserves higher outcomes) Type of Inequity 14

Employee Theft: A Reaction to Underpayment Theft Rate percentage of unaccounted for loss of

Employee Theft: A Reaction to Underpayment Theft Rate percentage of unaccounted for loss of property Employees of the factories in which there was a pay cut Employees of the factories in which there was no pay cut 9 Employee theft was greatest in factories whose employees experienced a cut in their pay. 8 7 6 5 4 Theft rates were identical before pay was cut in one of them. Theft rates were identical after pay was restored to normal levels. 3 2 1 0 Before Pay Cut During Pay Cut After Pay Cut 15

Procedural Justice • Perceived fairness of the processes by which organizational decisions are made

Procedural Justice • Perceived fairness of the processes by which organizational decisions are made – Voice: giving employees a say in how decisions are made – Error correction: allow opportunity for errors to be corrected – Consistently apply rules and policies – Bias suppression

Interactional Justice • Quality of interpersonal treatment (by supervisor) when decisions are made and

Interactional Justice • Quality of interpersonal treatment (by supervisor) when decisions are made and communicated – Information justification: thoroughness of information received about at decision – Social sensitivity: amount of dignity and respect demonstrated in the course of presenting an undesirable decision.

Applications of Justice Theories • Employee Selection • Pay systems – Two-tier wage structures

Applications of Justice Theories • Employee Selection • Pay systems – Two-tier wage structures – Pay secrecy • Participative Decision Making • Downsizing

Expectancy Theory People will be motivated to engage in a behavior (make a choice)

Expectancy Theory People will be motivated to engage in a behavior (make a choice) to the degree that they believe that the behavior will lead to a valued outcome

Expectancy Theory: An Overview Effort Expectancy Performance X Instrumentality Rewards Skills and abilities Motivation

Expectancy Theory: An Overview Effort Expectancy Performance X Instrumentality Rewards Skills and abilities Motivation Job Performance X Valence of Rewards Role perceptions and opportunities 16

Expectancy Model: Components Expectancy: The degree to which you expect that hard work (effort)

Expectancy Model: Components Expectancy: The degree to which you expect that hard work (effort) will lead to good performance or high accomplishments Instrumentality: The perception that if you perform well you will be rewarded Valence: How much do you value the rewards you may receive

Expectancy Theory, con’t • Force: the motivation to choose a particular course of action.

Expectancy Theory, con’t • Force: the motivation to choose a particular course of action. Where: E= Expectancy (probability that effort leads to performance) V=Valence (rating of how satisfying various rewards will be) I=Instrumentality (relationship between taking this option and gaining this reward)

Example: Choose between Job A vs. Job B • 1. What are the possible

Example: Choose between Job A vs. Job B • 1. What are the possible outcomes I would get from getting a job, and how much do I value each of these outcome (Valence) – Good salary 7 – Good Pension 6 – Interesting work 8 – Travel opportunities 4 Valences are measured on a scale from 1 (not at all satisfiying) to 10 (extremely satisfying)

Expectancy example, cont • Instrumentality: What is the relationship (subjective correlation) between choosing job

Expectancy example, cont • Instrumentality: What is the relationship (subjective correlation) between choosing job A or job B and obtaining this outcome? Instrumentality for Job A High salary. 75 Good Pension. . 25 Interesting work. 50 Travel. 75 Instrumentality for Job B. 50. 75. 25

Expectancy example, con’t • Expectancy: What is the probability that if I work hard,

Expectancy example, con’t • Expectancy: What is the probability that if I work hard, I will be successful: – In Job A: – In Job B: . 40. 70

Force: Which job should I choose Job A: High salary Good Pension Interesting work

Force: Which job should I choose Job A: High salary Good Pension Interesting work Travel Job B. High salary Good Pension Interesting work Travel Valence Instrum. 7. 75 6. 25 8. 50 4. 75 Sum 13. 75 Expectancy. 40 Force=. 40(13. 75) = 5. 5 Valence Instrum. 7. 50 6. 75 8. 75 4. 25 Sum 15. 00 Expectancy. 70 Force=. 70(15. 00) = 10. 5 V*I 5. 25 1. 50 4. 00 3. 00 V*I 3. 50 4. 50 6. 00 1. 00

Application of Expectancy Theory • Clarify expectancies between effort and performance and follow through

Application of Expectancy Theory • Clarify expectancies between effort and performance and follow through with rewards. – Pay for performance – Stock option plans and other incentive programs • Provide valued rewards – Cafeteria-style benefits

Motivating Jobs Through Job Redesign • Scientifically managed jobs: boring, repetitive, few skills utilized

Motivating Jobs Through Job Redesign • Scientifically managed jobs: boring, repetitive, few skills utilized • Job Enlargement: add more tasks of similar skill level to the job Horizontal Loading • Job Enrichment: add more responsibility and autonomy to the job Vertical Loading

Job Enlargement and Job Enrichment: A Comparison Standard Job Enlarged Job enlargement adds more

Job Enlargement and Job Enrichment: A Comparison Standard Job Enlarged Job enlargement adds more tasks at the same level of responsibility. Task 1 (low) (high) Task 1 Task 2 (low) Number of Tasks (high) (horizontal job loading) Task 2 Task 3 Task 4 (low) Level of Responsibility (vertical job loading) (high) Number of Tasks (horizontal job loading) Enhanced Job Task 1 Task 2 (high) Job enrichment adds more responsibility to the same number of tasks. (low) Number of Tasks (high) (horizontal job loading) 18

Job Characteristics model Job Characteristics Skill Variety Task Identity } Critical Psyc. States Experienced

Job Characteristics model Job Characteristics Skill Variety Task Identity } Critical Psyc. States Experienced Meaningfulness of Work Task Significance Autonomy Feedback Responsibility for work outcomes Knowledge of Results Growth Need Strength Job Outcomes Internal work motivation Job satisfaction Growth Satisfaction Low absenteeism High quality performance

Enriching Jobs: Some Suggestions From the Job Characteristics Model Principles of Job Description Core

Enriching Jobs: Some Suggestions From the Job Characteristics Model Principles of Job Description Core Job Dimensions Incorporated 1. Combines jobs enabling worker to perform the entire job Skill variety Task identity 2. Establishes client relationships allowing providers of a service to meet the recipients Skill variety Autonomy Feedback 3. Load jobs vertically allowing greater responsibility an control over work Autonomy 4. Open feedback channels giving workers knowledge Feedback of the results of their work 20