Chapter 7 Section 4 Price War When competitors

Chapter 7 Section 4

-Price War – When competitors cut their prices very low to win business. -This is legal only as it is done for a short period of time (i. e. 1 day) and thus does not hurt consumers or decrease competition

Illegal Business Activities: Collusion – Any agreement among firms or business leaders to do anything illegal such to set prices and production levels. -Price Fixing – An agreement among firms to sell at the same or very similar prices.

-Cartel – An agreement by formal organization of producers to coordinate prices and production. -Cartels can only work if every member keeps to its agreed output levels and no more , when this happens price will fall and firms will lose profit.

• Predatory pricing- Selling a product below cost in order to drive competitors out of the market • Antitrust Laws- Laws that encourage competition in the marketplace • Trust- Like a cartel, an illegal grouping of companies that discourage competition

• Merger- Combination of two or more companies into a single firm

• Monopolies are less fair than competitive markets. • Monopolies and oligopolies can sometimes be bad for the consumers and economy as a whole • Markets dominated by a few large firms generally have higher prices and lower outputs then markets with many sellers.

• Economists are skeptical about most claims of predatory pricing because the predator looses money each time it drives an endless series of rivals out of business

• The government has a number of policies that keep firms from controlling the price and supply of important goods • If a firm controls a large share of a market the Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justices Antitrust Division will watch the firm closely

• In 1890, Congress passed the Sherman Antitrust Act, which outlawed mergers and monopolies that limit trade between states • Despite the antitrust laws, companies have used many strategies to gain control over their market

• Some firms require a costumer who buys one product to buy other products from the same company. • The government has the power to regulate these practices if they give too much power to a company that already has few competitors.

• In 1997, The Department of Justice accused Microsoft of using a monopoly in operating systems. • They were also accused of predatory pricing because they gave away their browser for free, which could ruin Netscape, the other browser company.

• In 1999, the federal judge ruled that Microsoft was a monopoly and started working to reduce the companies power.

• The Government often blocks rising monopolies by preventing company mergers that might reduce competition and lead to higher prices.

• Deregulation is the removal of some government controls over a market. • In the late 1970’s-1980’s Congress passed laws to deregulate several industries. • Over several years, the government deregulated the airlines, trucking, banking, railroad, natural gas, and television broadcasting industries.

• Depending on the degree of deregulation, the governments action allowed –or forced- firms in some industries to compete in markets by eliminating many entry barriers and price controls. • Deregulation weakens government control

What is the purpose of anti-trust laws?

Under what conditions will the government approve a merger?

How does predatory pricing hurt competition?

How does deregulation change the banking and air travel industries?

Why did government once regulate the banking, trucking, and airline industries?

Why does the government feel it has to right to intervene in markets to promote competition?

What is a trust?

How are trust and cartels similar?

What are some examples of the government using antitrust legislation to breakup existing monopolies?

What strengthens government control ?