Ch 9 Communities Community Characteristics Many Nutrient Cycles

  • Slides: 24
Download presentation
Ch. 9 Communities

Ch. 9 Communities

Community Characteristics • Many!

Community Characteristics • Many!

Nutrient Cycles • Elements cycle • Communities differ in rates, where nutrients located

Nutrient Cycles • Elements cycle • Communities differ in rates, where nutrients located

Nutrient Cycles • Ex: • Tropical rain forest – C in • Subalpine forest

Nutrient Cycles • Ex: • Tropical rain forest – C in • Subalpine forest – C in

 • Standing biomass: Productivity

• Standing biomass: Productivity

Productivity • Net primary productivity: energy

Productivity • Net primary productivity: energy

Net primary productivity (Pn) • Desert: Lowest on land • Mangrove forest, marsh, swamp:

Net primary productivity (Pn) • Desert: Lowest on land • Mangrove forest, marsh, swamp: Highest! Pn=net primary productivity (metric tons per ha/yr) B=standing biomass (tons/ha)

Energy Conversion • Energy conversion efficiency: % incoming energy into plant mass – Note

Energy Conversion • Energy conversion efficiency: % incoming energy into plant mass – Note small values

Community Characteristics • Change through time. . .

Community Characteristics • Change through time. . .

 • • Community Characteristics Change through time. . . Succession: discuss later Stability:

• • Community Characteristics Change through time. . . Succession: discuss later Stability: Components: – Resistance: – Resilience: – Persistence: Only resistance not worth effort to quantify. WHY? ?

And now, for something completely different. . Classification of communities

And now, for something completely different. . Classification of communities

Classification of communities • Data collection (sampling) covered in lab lectures

Classification of communities • Data collection (sampling) covered in lab lectures

Classification of communities • Data collection (sampling) covered: lab lectures • Recall……. • Association:

Classification of communities • Data collection (sampling) covered: lab lectures • Recall……. • Association: more formal and precise unit – basic unit plant community classification – composed of stands (stand: particular member association) – taxonomic analogy: association = sp. , stands = inds. • How decide which stands belong to same association?

Classification of communities • 4 major approaches: • • 1) Tabular methods 2) Cluster

Classification of communities • 4 major approaches: • • 1) Tabular methods 2) Cluster analysis 3) Association analysis 4) Ordination methods

Tabular methods • American approach: based on “dominance” (physiognomic) – Importance Values Plant Ecology

Tabular methods • American approach: based on “dominance” (physiognomic) – Importance Values Plant Ecology

Tabular methods • Association based on dominants (layers) – Ex, Pinus ponderosa/

Tabular methods • Association based on dominants (layers) – Ex, Pinus ponderosa/

Tabular methods • European approach: based on entire flora • Braun-Blanquet technique (relevé technique)

Tabular methods • European approach: based on entire flora • Braun-Blanquet technique (relevé technique) Sounds French

Tabular methods • Braun-Blanquet (relevé) technique • Sample called relevé – 1) – 2)

Tabular methods • Braun-Blanquet (relevé) technique • Sample called relevé – 1) – 2)

Tabular methods • Braun-Blanquet (relevé) technique • Sample called relevé – – 1) 2)

Tabular methods • Braun-Blanquet (relevé) technique • Sample called relevé – – 1) 2) 3) 4)

 • Classification: Tabular methods Cover, sociability (dispersion)

• Classification: Tabular methods Cover, sociability (dispersion)

Tabular methods • Differentiated table has differential species: – Have hi fidelity: – Have

Tabular methods • Differentiated table has differential species: – Have hi fidelity: – Have hi constancy:

 • Note: • 1) Tabular methods Olympic National Park, Washington

• Note: • 1) Tabular methods Olympic National Park, Washington

Cluster analysis • Expresses similarity of stands graphically (2 D) • Similarity? Coefficient of

Cluster analysis • Expresses similarity of stands graphically (2 D) • Similarity? Coefficient of Community (CC) • CC:

 • 2 major indices: Cluster analysis – Jaccard’s Index – Sorensen’s Index

• 2 major indices: Cluster analysis – Jaccard’s Index – Sorensen’s Index