UW Engineering DOM Studies Kael Hanson University of

  • Slides: 25
Download presentation
UW Engineering DOM Studies Kael Hanson University of Wisconsin – Madison LBNL DOM Workshop

UW Engineering DOM Studies Kael Hanson University of Wisconsin – Madison LBNL DOM Workshop 23 July 2003 LBNL DOM Workshop

What Testing was Done? • Guiding principle “Attempt to carry out measurements and see

What Testing was Done? • Guiding principle “Attempt to carry out measurements and see how DOM behaves as a data acquisition platform then follow our noses. ” • Initial measurements desired: – Phototube gain – Peak-to-valley – Phototube noise (not yet /w/ DOM) • These measurements implied a priori characterization of DOM analog F. E. • Summary of measurements captured in Engineering DOM Tests document. 23 July 2003 LBNL DOM Workshop 2

DOMs Under Test (DUTs) • UW now has 12 DOM-MBs: – 5 in ‘active’

DOMs Under Test (DUTs) • UW now has 12 DOM-MBs: – 5 in ‘active’ DOMs (XE 3 P 0001 -0005) – 6 in DOMs awaiting testing – 1 DOMMB in use by NK for HV base tests • 2 DOMMBs returned to LBNL because of hardware problems: – 1 flash RAM failure – 1 CPLD failure (could not program) 23 July 2003 LBNL DOM Workshop 3

DUT Configurations • Currently all 4 above DOMs running in chest freezer at PSL

DUT Configurations • Currently all 4 above DOMs running in chest freezer at PSL • XE 3 P 0003 is in freezer at Chamberlin undergoing analog tests • Full DOM Work-in-Progress table maintained by Jim Hoffman 23 July 2003 LBNL DOM Workshop 4

ATWD Pedestal Study • Purpose – Monitor system electronic noise – ATWD gain calibration

ATWD Pedestal Study • Purpose – Monitor system electronic noise – ATWD gain calibration • Procedure – Set ambient temperature to -20 ºC, … – Set FE bias to various levels – Acquire CPU-triggered ATWD shots 23 July 2003 LBNL DOM Workshop 5

FE Gain – ATWD Channel 0 Clamping amplifier in ATWD ch 0 introduces nonlinearity

FE Gain – ATWD Channel 0 Clamping amplifier in ATWD ch 0 introduces nonlinearity in analog FE! 23 July 2003 LBNL DOM Workshop 6

FE Gain – ATWD Channel 1 No clamping amp – linear but ATWD overflows

FE Gain – ATWD Channel 1 No clamping amp – linear but ATWD overflows around 1 V – incorrect ATWD tuning parameters here or intentional behavior? 23 July 2003 LBNL DOM Workshop 7

FE Pedestal/Gain Calibration Proposal • If you take delta between 5 th and 1

FE Pedestal/Gain Calibration Proposal • If you take delta between 5 th and 1 st curves on previous plot, you would naively expect a flat line. • Resulting line is not flat – features persist – do we need separate gain calibration for each ATWD bin? 23 July 2003 Is this subscript necessary? I LBNL DOM Workshop 8

Pedestal Noise – ISEG DOM 718 F PMT HV turned off! max(abs(wfd-ped)) 23 July

Pedestal Noise – ISEG DOM 718 F PMT HV turned off! max(abs(wfd-ped)) 23 July 2003 LBNL DOM Workshop 9

ATWD Pedestal Noise (2) • HV base turned off but ISEG base (718 F)

ATWD Pedestal Noise (2) • HV base turned off but ISEG base (718 F) just disables HV – power not turned off to base. Disconnecting HV ribbon lowers noise somewhat. • Oddly enough, Ch 1 shows about same level of noise – would expect 4 x less scaling with opamp gain. 23 July 2003 LBNL DOM Workshop 10

Pedestal Noise – ISEG DOM 7 DAC (ISEG base /w/ no ground wire) 23

Pedestal Noise – ISEG DOM 7 DAC (ISEG base /w/ no ground wire) 23 July 2003 LBNL DOM Workshop 11

Pedestal Noise – EMCO DOM 71 DB 23 July 2003 LBNL DOM Workshop 12

Pedestal Noise – EMCO DOM 71 DB 23 July 2003 LBNL DOM Workshop 12

Floating Baseline? • Tried to test noise with HV on/off but run into problem

Floating Baseline? • Tried to test noise with HV on/off but run into problem of wobbling ATWD baseline and odd undershoot at pulse beginning (RHS). • (See next page) overall stability of pedestal on 2 hr timescale OK /w/ HV off but HV on causes large rms and drift. 23 July 2003 LBNL DOM Workshop 13

ATWD Drift vs. Time NO HV HV ON Approx 2 hr. run time 23

ATWD Drift vs. Time NO HV HV ON Approx 2 hr. run time 23 July 2003 LBNL DOM Workshop 14

Summary on Pedestal Testing • Significant noise in FE seems due to HV base

Summary on Pedestal Testing • Significant noise in FE seems due to HV base (no noise seen in DOMMB tests? ). Of options EMCO/ISEG, latter produces clearly visible hash in FE while former is clean. • Clamping amp nonlinearity significant. Can we tune this away or are we stuck with it? Do we really want to put a clamping amp on any more channels? • ATWD channel 1 overflows at about 1 V input (50 pe) – again, is this a tuning problem? • Is ATWD FE characterization simply a pedestal fingerprint or do we need more calibration knobs such as individual ATWD bin pedestals and gains. 23 July 2003 LBNL DOM Workshop 15

Pulser Tests • Purpose – Calibrate op-amp gains – SPE/MPE discriminator studies • Procedure

Pulser Tests • Purpose – Calibrate op-amp gains – SPE/MPE discriminator studies • Procedure – Disable HV – Set internal pulser amp to 1/3 pe, 1 pe, … – Do discriminator sweep (FSCAN) – Acquire pulser waveforms 23 July 2003 LBNL DOM Workshop 16

Pulser Discriminator 23 July 2003 LBNL DOM Workshop 17

Pulser Discriminator 23 July 2003 LBNL DOM Workshop 17

Pulser Waveforms • Unable to acquire pulser waveforms with synchronous pulser trigger – advertised

Pulser Waveforms • Unable to acquire pulser waveforms with synchronous pulser trigger – advertised in FPGA register level docs but either I called incorrectly or problem at FPGA • This type of trigger – synch with FE pulser, LED flasherboard required for some tests. 23 July 2003 LBNL DOM Workshop 18

SPE Discriminator Scan – PMT Pulses Input (71 DB) 23 July 2003 LBNL DOM

SPE Discriminator Scan – PMT Pulses Input (71 DB) 23 July 2003 LBNL DOM Workshop 19

SPE Waveforms CH 0 CH 2 CH 1 23 July 2003 LBNL DOM Workshop

SPE Waveforms CH 0 CH 2 CH 1 23 July 2003 LBNL DOM Workshop 20

SPE Waveforms (2) • Presence of HV again causes drift of front-end baseline. •

SPE Waveforms (2) • Presence of HV again causes drift of front-end baseline. • This may be due to ATWD overvoltage – ATWD channel 1 can saturate – ATWD channel 2 seems OK – small drift but probably functional – Why is ATWD channel 0, protected by clamping amplifier, having problems? • Current situation with drifting baselines makes analysis of ch 0/ch 1 waveforms very tricky – hope we can alter the clamping voltage to workaround – need information on this system. 23 July 2003 LBNL DOM Workshop 21

Gain and P/V Measurement – DOM 0001 -3 C 62 -71 BD 23 July

Gain and P/V Measurement – DOM 0001 -3 C 62 -71 BD 23 July 2003 LBNL DOM Workshop 22

Cheap P/V & Gain Analysis • Used ATWD ch 2 because of baseline wobble

Cheap P/V & Gain Analysis • Used ATWD ch 2 because of baseline wobble – gain of this channel is 2/3× so had to crank HV up to 1600, 1800, 2000 V. • Clear P/V appears at 2000 V (apx. 2. 2: 1) • Assuming ATWD gain is 1 m. V/count, FE gain is 2/3×, the peak occurs around 40 m. V – resulting in gain of about 5 × 107 – this just makes target! 23 July 2003 LBNL DOM Workshop 23

Signal Frequency Analysis 23 July 2003 LBNL DOM Workshop 24

Signal Frequency Analysis 23 July 2003 LBNL DOM Workshop 24

Conclusions • Noise on ISEG HV base is potential trouble – analog tests indicate

Conclusions • Noise on ISEG HV base is potential trouble – analog tests indicate that level is less than 1 m. V p-p but really need to understand characteristics after FE op-amps. • Several issues with ATWD-captured waveforms: – ‘startup’ bug: 1 st sample after several seconds idle is corrupted – this is more annoying than problematic – Crosstalk from clock when mux’ed into channel 3 – OK once AG explained the problem and the fix. However, crosstalk from ch 0 to ch 1, ch 2 potential problem. Do we test? – Clamping amplifier causes log rolloff of channel 0 – Saturated ATWD inputs cause sizable baseline drift • ATWD channel 0 gain seems a bit high – 16 x implies approx 100 m. V spe, about 100 ATWD counts. Could probably reduce gain by factor of 2, perhaps up to 4. 23 July 2003 LBNL DOM Workshop 25