RQM 403 Requirements Executive Overview Wrap Up Requirements

RQM 403 Requirements Executive Overview Wrap Up Requirements and Acquisition Management In the 21 st Century Requirements Management Certification Training

Today’s Summary Tab 4 Resources (PPBE) Tab 2 Tab 6 – Wrap Up Requirements (JCIDS) Defense Acquisition System Tabs (DAS) 3 and 5 2

Defense Acquisition Portal— Requirements Management https: //dap. dau. mil/career/rm/Pages/Default. aspx Tab 6 – Wrap Up 3

RQM 310 Class Schedule Tab 6 – Wrap Up 4

Mission Statement The DAEOW Mission: • Provide Senior Executives / Flag Officers / Members / Personal and Professional Staff With Current, Pertinent Defense Acquisition System Information, Specifically Tailored to Their Particular Needs • Informal, Non-Attribution • Invitation to the Executive and Selected Staff Members Tab 6 – Wrap Up 5

DAEOW Areas of Interest— Contact DAU for Complete Listing • Defense Acquisition Executive Overview Workshop (DAEOW) – – – – Tab 6 – Wrap Up Requirements Management Risk Management Life Cycle Logistics Contract Management Overview Earned Value Management (EVM) Software Acquisition Management Defense Industry Business Management International Program Management Integrated Program Management Contracting Methods Source Selection Contracting for Services Contract Types and Incentives 6

For Reach Back Support • DSMC Dean – Pat Wills, 703 -805 -4563, patrick. wills@dau. mil • Associate Dean for Requirements, Executive & International Programs – Maryann Watson, 703 -805 -4640, maryann. watson@dau. mil • Associate Dean for Outreach & Mission Assistance – John Mueller, 703 -805 -3445, john. mueller@dau. mil • DSMC Director, Requirements Center – Tony Romano, 703 -805 -4368, anthony. romano@dau. mil Providing Assistance at Your Point and Time of Need Tab 6 – Wrap Up 7

Feedback Request • Course evaluation • Graduation folder – Certificate – Disk with Briefings, Tools, Policy Documents, etc. • Guest Speaker Opportunities Tab 6 – Wrap Up 8

Thank you for your participation! Tab 6 – Wrap-up 9

CLR 101 Outcomes • Outlines the JCIDS process – – – Tab 6 – Wrap Up Identify documents List stakeholders Analysis Staffing Validation and approval Transition to the Defense Acquisition System 10

RQM 110 Outcomes • Identify how today’s requirements and capabilities for the warfighter are conceived, developed, tested and acquired • Recognize the roles of stakeholders responsible for the clarification, approval, and advocacy of a warfighter capability • Explain the processes, tools, and formats for guiding a requirement from the needs of the warfighter through JCIDS and acquisition as a method of fulfillment • Discuss Do. D policies, procedures, and management tools impacting successful submittal of a requirement through Do. D Tab 6 – Wrap Up 11

RQM 310 Outcomes • Justify and defend the warfighter’s requirements as they advance through JCIDS, DAS, and PPBE – Organize a CBA; evaluate and apply CBA results – Develop requirements based on analysis results – Apply trade space to meet Key Performance Parameters (KPPs) – Staff and validate changes to approved KPPs – Interface with the Defense Acquisition System (DAS) – Respond to Rapid Response situations Tab 6 – Wrap Up 12

CLR 151 – Analysis of Alternatives (Ao. A) • Description: CLR 151 is an online module that introduces the Do. D Analysis of Alternatives (Ao. A) process • Objective: Teach students the analytical process Do. D organizations use to identify and assess military capabilities, capability gaps, and solution approaches Tab 6 – Wrap Up 13

CLR 250 – Capabilities-Based Assessments (CBA) • Description: CLR 250 is an online module that examines how to conduct a Capability-Based Assessment (CBA) and to apply the CBA results • Objective: Given sample data and direction, recognize the CBA process and challenges to generate results that impact follow-on JCIDS documents. Tab 6 – Wrap Up 14

CLR 252 – Developing Performance Attributes • Description: CLR 252 is an online module to describe how to develop Key Performance Parameters (KPPs), Key System Attributes (KSAs) and the relationship of the KPPs and KSAs to Measures of Effectiveness (MOEs), Measures of Performance (MOPs), and Measures of Suitability (MOSs). • Objective: Given warfighter feedback and analysis results, critique requirements statements to include well-written KPPs and KSAs; then relate those requirements statements to Measures of Effectiveness (MOEs), Measures of Performance (MOPs), and Measures of Suitability (MOSs) Tab 6 – Wrap Up 15