Pseudoefficiencies studies Ruslan Akhunzyanov Oleg Kouznetsov Data used

Pseudo-efficiencies studies Ruslan Akhunzyanov & Oleg Kouznetsov

Data used in the analysis 2016 2012 P 4 P 7 P 8 272557 274594 275037 W 48 109033 -109074 No cuts were applied.

Silicone 3 2016 2012

2016 Pixel Micromegas (similar pictures for MP 01 MU, MP 01 MV, MP 02 MU/MV/MX/MY, MP 03 MU/MV/MX/MY) 2012

2016 ≈0. 5 Straw 3 - X 1 ≈0. 25 ≈0. 3 ≈0. 1 ≈0. 6 2012

Straw 3 - U 1 2016 ≈0. 3 ≈0. 25 ≈0. 65 ≈0. 5 2012

Straw 3 - V 1 2016 ≈0. 5 ≈0. 25 ≈0. 65 ≈0. 3 ≈0. 55 2012

Straw 3 – X 2 2016 ≈0. 4 ≈0. 5 2012

MWPC A 2016 2012 0. 7 (similar pictures for PA 04 and PA 05: pseudoefficiencies of U and V planes are lower than in 2012 )

MWPC A 2016 2012 0. 55 (similar pictures for PA 11: pseudoeff. of U and V planes are lower than in 2012 )

W 45 2016 0. 05 0. 1 2012

MWPC B 2016 2012 0. 6 (similar pictures for PB 03 and PB 05: pseudoeff. of X planes are lower than in 2012)

2016 Muon Wall 2 ≈0. 6 -0. 7 Similar pictures for MB 01 V 1, MB 02 X 2, MB 02 V 2. 2012

2016 Muon Wall 2 2012

Gem 11 2016 0. 35 0. 45 0. 55 0. 45 2012 0. 6 0. 15 0. 6 0. 2 0. 5 0. 35 0. 6 0. 95

Planes Pseudo efficiency Notes SI 03 X 1 0 OK in 2012 MP 01 MV, MP 01 MU, MP 01 MX, MP 01 MY 0 MP 02 MV, MP 02 MU, MP 02 MX, MP 02 MY 0 MP 03 MV, MP 03 MU, MP 03 MX, MP 03 MY 0 DC 05 (all planes) 0 in P 4; OK in P 7 -P 8 ST 03 X 1 ua, ST 03 X 1 da ST 03 X 1 uc, ST 03 X 1 dc low (0. 1 -0. 5) and fluctuating 0. 5 -0. 6 (in P 7 -P 8) OK in 2012 ST 03 U 1 ua, ST 03 U 1 da ST 03 U 1 uc ST 03 U 1 dc 0 in P 4, 0. 2 -0. 3 in P 7 -P 8 0. 25 0. 5 -0. 65 OK in 2012 ST 03 V 1 ua, ST 03 V 1 uc, ST 03 V 1 da, ST 03 V 1 dc ~OK in P 4, but low (0. 2 -0. 5) in P 7 -P 8 OK in 2012 ST 03 Y 2 dc 0. 3 and fluctuating OK in 2012 ST 03 X 2 ua, ST 03 X 2 uc, ST 03 X 2 da, ST 03 X 2 dc ~OK in P 4, but low (0. 4 -0. 5) in P 7 -P 8 OK in 2012

Planes Pseudo efficiency Notes PS 01 X 1 0. 65 OK in 2012 PA 02 X 1 0. 25 in P 7; OK in P 4 and P 8 PA 03 U 1, PA 03 V 1 0. 7 OK in 2012 PA 04 U 1, PA 04 V 1 0. 65 OK in 2012 PA 05 U 1, PA 05 V 1 0. 7 OK in 2012 DW 04 (all planes) 0. 45 -0. 65 DW 05 X 2, DW 05 V 1, DW 05 V 2 0. 6 0. 5 -0. 6 0. 7 -0. 8 in 2012 PA 11 U 1, PA 11 V 1 0. 55 OK in 2012 PA 06 U 1, PA 06 V 1 0. 55 OK in 2012 DW 06 U 1, DW 06 U 2 0. 05 OK in 2012 FI 08 0 in P 4; OK in P 7 -P 8 HO 04 Y 1_m 0. 65, somewhat fluctuating same in 2012

Planes Pseudo efficiency Notes PB 01 X 1 0. 65 OK in 2012 MB 01 X 1 uc, dc MB 01 Y 1 ur, dr MB 01 Y 1 ul, dl MB 01 V 1 uc, dc 0. 6, strongly fluctuating 0. 55 strongly fluctuating 0. 7, strongly fluctuating better in 2012 slightly better in 2012 PB 03 X 1 0. 6 OK in 2012 MB 02 X 2 uc, dc MB 02 Y 2 ul MB 02 Y 2 ur MB 02 Y 2 dl MB 02 V 2 uc, dc 0. 65, strongly fluctuating mostly 0 0 strongly fluctuating 0. 6, strongly fluctuating better in 2012 PB 05 X 1 0. 6 OK in 2012 GM 11 U 1 GM 11 V 1 GM 11 Y 1 GM 11 X 1 0. 35 in P 4 and P 7, 0. 45 in P 4 and P 7, 0. 55 in P 4 and P 7, 0. 45 in P 4 and P 7, 0. 15 in P 8 0. 2 in P 8 0. 5 in P 8 0. 35 in P 8 0. 6 in 2012 - ”- ”OK in 2012