Pseudoefficiencies studies Ruslan Akhunzyanov Oleg Kouznetsov Data used

  • Slides: 18
Download presentation
Pseudo-efficiencies studies Ruslan Akhunzyanov & Oleg Kouznetsov

Pseudo-efficiencies studies Ruslan Akhunzyanov & Oleg Kouznetsov

Data used in the analysis 2016 2012 P 4 P 7 P 8 272557

Data used in the analysis 2016 2012 P 4 P 7 P 8 272557 274594 275037 W 48 109033 -109074 No cuts were applied.

Silicone 3 2016 2012

Silicone 3 2016 2012

2016 Pixel Micromegas (similar pictures for MP 01 MU, MP 01 MV, MP 02

2016 Pixel Micromegas (similar pictures for MP 01 MU, MP 01 MV, MP 02 MU/MV/MX/MY, MP 03 MU/MV/MX/MY) 2012

2016 ≈0. 5 Straw 3 - X 1 ≈0. 25 ≈0. 3 ≈0. 1

2016 ≈0. 5 Straw 3 - X 1 ≈0. 25 ≈0. 3 ≈0. 1 ≈0. 6 2012

Straw 3 - U 1 2016 ≈0. 3 ≈0. 25 ≈0. 65 ≈0. 5

Straw 3 - U 1 2016 ≈0. 3 ≈0. 25 ≈0. 65 ≈0. 5 2012

Straw 3 - V 1 2016 ≈0. 5 ≈0. 25 ≈0. 65 ≈0. 3

Straw 3 - V 1 2016 ≈0. 5 ≈0. 25 ≈0. 65 ≈0. 3 ≈0. 55 2012

Straw 3 – X 2 2016 ≈0. 4 ≈0. 5 2012

Straw 3 – X 2 2016 ≈0. 4 ≈0. 5 2012

MWPC A 2016 2012 0. 7 (similar pictures for PA 04 and PA 05:

MWPC A 2016 2012 0. 7 (similar pictures for PA 04 and PA 05: pseudoefficiencies of U and V planes are lower than in 2012 )

MWPC A 2016 2012 0. 55 (similar pictures for PA 11: pseudoeff. of U

MWPC A 2016 2012 0. 55 (similar pictures for PA 11: pseudoeff. of U and V planes are lower than in 2012 )

W 45 2016 0. 05 0. 1 2012

W 45 2016 0. 05 0. 1 2012

MWPC B 2016 2012 0. 6 (similar pictures for PB 03 and PB 05:

MWPC B 2016 2012 0. 6 (similar pictures for PB 03 and PB 05: pseudoeff. of X planes are lower than in 2012)

2016 Muon Wall 2 ≈0. 6 -0. 7 Similar pictures for MB 01 V

2016 Muon Wall 2 ≈0. 6 -0. 7 Similar pictures for MB 01 V 1, MB 02 X 2, MB 02 V 2. 2012

2016 Muon Wall 2 2012

2016 Muon Wall 2 2012

Gem 11 2016 0. 35 0. 45 0. 55 0. 45 2012 0. 6

Gem 11 2016 0. 35 0. 45 0. 55 0. 45 2012 0. 6 0. 15 0. 6 0. 2 0. 5 0. 35 0. 6 0. 95

Planes Pseudo efficiency Notes SI 03 X 1 0 OK in 2012 MP 01

Planes Pseudo efficiency Notes SI 03 X 1 0 OK in 2012 MP 01 MV, MP 01 MU, MP 01 MX, MP 01 MY 0 MP 02 MV, MP 02 MU, MP 02 MX, MP 02 MY 0 MP 03 MV, MP 03 MU, MP 03 MX, MP 03 MY 0 DC 05 (all planes) 0 in P 4; OK in P 7 -P 8 ST 03 X 1 ua, ST 03 X 1 da ST 03 X 1 uc, ST 03 X 1 dc low (0. 1 -0. 5) and fluctuating 0. 5 -0. 6 (in P 7 -P 8) OK in 2012 ST 03 U 1 ua, ST 03 U 1 da ST 03 U 1 uc ST 03 U 1 dc 0 in P 4, 0. 2 -0. 3 in P 7 -P 8 0. 25 0. 5 -0. 65 OK in 2012 ST 03 V 1 ua, ST 03 V 1 uc, ST 03 V 1 da, ST 03 V 1 dc ~OK in P 4, but low (0. 2 -0. 5) in P 7 -P 8 OK in 2012 ST 03 Y 2 dc 0. 3 and fluctuating OK in 2012 ST 03 X 2 ua, ST 03 X 2 uc, ST 03 X 2 da, ST 03 X 2 dc ~OK in P 4, but low (0. 4 -0. 5) in P 7 -P 8 OK in 2012

Planes Pseudo efficiency Notes PS 01 X 1 0. 65 OK in 2012 PA

Planes Pseudo efficiency Notes PS 01 X 1 0. 65 OK in 2012 PA 02 X 1 0. 25 in P 7; OK in P 4 and P 8 PA 03 U 1, PA 03 V 1 0. 7 OK in 2012 PA 04 U 1, PA 04 V 1 0. 65 OK in 2012 PA 05 U 1, PA 05 V 1 0. 7 OK in 2012 DW 04 (all planes) 0. 45 -0. 65 DW 05 X 2, DW 05 V 1, DW 05 V 2 0. 6 0. 5 -0. 6 0. 7 -0. 8 in 2012 PA 11 U 1, PA 11 V 1 0. 55 OK in 2012 PA 06 U 1, PA 06 V 1 0. 55 OK in 2012 DW 06 U 1, DW 06 U 2 0. 05 OK in 2012 FI 08 0 in P 4; OK in P 7 -P 8 HO 04 Y 1_m 0. 65, somewhat fluctuating same in 2012

Planes Pseudo efficiency Notes PB 01 X 1 0. 65 OK in 2012 MB

Planes Pseudo efficiency Notes PB 01 X 1 0. 65 OK in 2012 MB 01 X 1 uc, dc MB 01 Y 1 ur, dr MB 01 Y 1 ul, dl MB 01 V 1 uc, dc 0. 6, strongly fluctuating 0. 55 strongly fluctuating 0. 7, strongly fluctuating better in 2012 slightly better in 2012 PB 03 X 1 0. 6 OK in 2012 MB 02 X 2 uc, dc MB 02 Y 2 ul MB 02 Y 2 ur MB 02 Y 2 dl MB 02 V 2 uc, dc 0. 65, strongly fluctuating mostly 0 0 strongly fluctuating 0. 6, strongly fluctuating better in 2012 PB 05 X 1 0. 6 OK in 2012 GM 11 U 1 GM 11 V 1 GM 11 Y 1 GM 11 X 1 0. 35 in P 4 and P 7, 0. 45 in P 4 and P 7, 0. 55 in P 4 and P 7, 0. 45 in P 4 and P 7, 0. 15 in P 8 0. 2 in P 8 0. 5 in P 8 0. 35 in P 8 0. 6 in 2012 - ”- ”OK in 2012