Pseudoefficiencies studies Ruslan Akhunzyanov Oleg Kouznetsov Data used


















- Slides: 18

Pseudo-efficiencies studies Ruslan Akhunzyanov & Oleg Kouznetsov

Data used in the analysis 2016 2012 P 4 P 7 P 8 272557 274594 275037 W 48 109033 -109074 No cuts were applied.

Silicone 3 2016 2012

2016 Pixel Micromegas (similar pictures for MP 01 MU, MP 01 MV, MP 02 MU/MV/MX/MY, MP 03 MU/MV/MX/MY) 2012

2016 ≈0. 5 Straw 3 - X 1 ≈0. 25 ≈0. 3 ≈0. 1 ≈0. 6 2012

Straw 3 - U 1 2016 ≈0. 3 ≈0. 25 ≈0. 65 ≈0. 5 2012

Straw 3 - V 1 2016 ≈0. 5 ≈0. 25 ≈0. 65 ≈0. 3 ≈0. 55 2012

Straw 3 – X 2 2016 ≈0. 4 ≈0. 5 2012

MWPC A 2016 2012 0. 7 (similar pictures for PA 04 and PA 05: pseudoefficiencies of U and V planes are lower than in 2012 )

MWPC A 2016 2012 0. 55 (similar pictures for PA 11: pseudoeff. of U and V planes are lower than in 2012 )

W 45 2016 0. 05 0. 1 2012

MWPC B 2016 2012 0. 6 (similar pictures for PB 03 and PB 05: pseudoeff. of X planes are lower than in 2012)

2016 Muon Wall 2 ≈0. 6 -0. 7 Similar pictures for MB 01 V 1, MB 02 X 2, MB 02 V 2. 2012

2016 Muon Wall 2 2012

Gem 11 2016 0. 35 0. 45 0. 55 0. 45 2012 0. 6 0. 15 0. 6 0. 2 0. 5 0. 35 0. 6 0. 95

Planes Pseudo efficiency Notes SI 03 X 1 0 OK in 2012 MP 01 MV, MP 01 MU, MP 01 MX, MP 01 MY 0 MP 02 MV, MP 02 MU, MP 02 MX, MP 02 MY 0 MP 03 MV, MP 03 MU, MP 03 MX, MP 03 MY 0 DC 05 (all planes) 0 in P 4; OK in P 7 -P 8 ST 03 X 1 ua, ST 03 X 1 da ST 03 X 1 uc, ST 03 X 1 dc low (0. 1 -0. 5) and fluctuating 0. 5 -0. 6 (in P 7 -P 8) OK in 2012 ST 03 U 1 ua, ST 03 U 1 da ST 03 U 1 uc ST 03 U 1 dc 0 in P 4, 0. 2 -0. 3 in P 7 -P 8 0. 25 0. 5 -0. 65 OK in 2012 ST 03 V 1 ua, ST 03 V 1 uc, ST 03 V 1 da, ST 03 V 1 dc ~OK in P 4, but low (0. 2 -0. 5) in P 7 -P 8 OK in 2012 ST 03 Y 2 dc 0. 3 and fluctuating OK in 2012 ST 03 X 2 ua, ST 03 X 2 uc, ST 03 X 2 da, ST 03 X 2 dc ~OK in P 4, but low (0. 4 -0. 5) in P 7 -P 8 OK in 2012

Planes Pseudo efficiency Notes PS 01 X 1 0. 65 OK in 2012 PA 02 X 1 0. 25 in P 7; OK in P 4 and P 8 PA 03 U 1, PA 03 V 1 0. 7 OK in 2012 PA 04 U 1, PA 04 V 1 0. 65 OK in 2012 PA 05 U 1, PA 05 V 1 0. 7 OK in 2012 DW 04 (all planes) 0. 45 -0. 65 DW 05 X 2, DW 05 V 1, DW 05 V 2 0. 6 0. 5 -0. 6 0. 7 -0. 8 in 2012 PA 11 U 1, PA 11 V 1 0. 55 OK in 2012 PA 06 U 1, PA 06 V 1 0. 55 OK in 2012 DW 06 U 1, DW 06 U 2 0. 05 OK in 2012 FI 08 0 in P 4; OK in P 7 -P 8 HO 04 Y 1_m 0. 65, somewhat fluctuating same in 2012

Planes Pseudo efficiency Notes PB 01 X 1 0. 65 OK in 2012 MB 01 X 1 uc, dc MB 01 Y 1 ur, dr MB 01 Y 1 ul, dl MB 01 V 1 uc, dc 0. 6, strongly fluctuating 0. 55 strongly fluctuating 0. 7, strongly fluctuating better in 2012 slightly better in 2012 PB 03 X 1 0. 6 OK in 2012 MB 02 X 2 uc, dc MB 02 Y 2 ul MB 02 Y 2 ur MB 02 Y 2 dl MB 02 V 2 uc, dc 0. 65, strongly fluctuating mostly 0 0 strongly fluctuating 0. 6, strongly fluctuating better in 2012 PB 05 X 1 0. 6 OK in 2012 GM 11 U 1 GM 11 V 1 GM 11 Y 1 GM 11 X 1 0. 35 in P 4 and P 7, 0. 45 in P 4 and P 7, 0. 55 in P 4 and P 7, 0. 45 in P 4 and P 7, 0. 15 in P 8 0. 2 in P 8 0. 5 in P 8 0. 35 in P 8 0. 6 in 2012 - ”- ”OK in 2012
Ruslan oja
Oleg kouznetsov
Ruslan mitkov
Hipermetn
Ruslan oja
Antrostomia
Ruslan oja
Site:slidetodoc.com
Parafiini füüsikalised omadused
Paradigm shift from women studies to gender studies
Moldvia
Oleg shuplyak freud voyeur
Butirka
Oleg kolesnikov
Oleg shuplyak biography
Oleg deev
Oleg zhivetin
Oleg kolesnikov
Oleg grachov