Office of the Secretary of Defense Microelectronics Activity

  • Slides: 8
Download presentation
Office of the Secretary of Defense Microelectronics Activity (DMEA) Doug Casanova Defense Microelectronics Activity

Office of the Secretary of Defense Microelectronics Activity (DMEA) Doug Casanova Defense Microelectronics Activity (DMEA)

DMEA Mission Ø Do. D Mission - Provide microelectronics technology solutions Ø Leverage advanced

DMEA Mission Ø Do. D Mission - Provide microelectronics technology solutions Ø Leverage advanced microelectronics technologies Improve reliability and maintainability Ø Enhance capability and performance Ø Address effects of rapid obsolescence Ø Assigned as Do. D Executive Agent for microelectronics DMS Ø Coordinate DOD activities Ø Develop OSD policy and strategy Ø Ø Ø Serve as joint resource for Do. D / government / industry / foreign allies Established by Secretary of Defense Defined DMEA’s joint mission & explicit organizational structure Ø Report directly to the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Logistics & Materiel Readiness Ø

The Challenge Ø Increased Do. D use / reliance on microelectronics (“Smart” weapon systems)

The Challenge Ø Increased Do. D use / reliance on microelectronics (“Smart” weapon systems) Essential technology for all military missions Ø Strategic, tactical, C 4 I, special ops Ø “Critical” Do. D technology Ø Enabling technology for transformational opportunities Ø Ø Extended system life cycles (20 – 40 years) Ø Ø Increased reliability and maintainability issues Rapidly evolving, expanding missions - new capability requirements Diminishing Manufacturing Sources (DMS) Decreased technology stability Ø Ø Dynamic development drives obsolescence cycles of 18 months or less Over 95% of all Do. D DMS cases are electronics Notional Projected Lifetime 1946 Extended Life B-52 1955 0 Years 50 2040+ 94+ Years 100

DMEA’s Total Solution Approach Ø Key: Understand ALL the military requirements Ø Verify System

DMEA’s Total Solution Approach Ø Key: Understand ALL the military requirements Ø Verify System Problems Reliability and maintainability of system/boards Adequacy of spares Ø Testability and repair issues Ø Existing and projected obsolescence Ø Ø Ø Develop Solution Options Ø Component Ø Ø Ø Aftermarket Substitution Emulation Custom Board / Box / System Ø Technology Compression Ø TOC savings over chip for chip Ø Increased capability (transformation) Ø Opportunity for open architecture

DMEA’s Advanced Reconfigurable Manufacturing for Semiconductors (ARMS) Ø Government / Semiconductor Industry partnership New

DMEA’s Advanced Reconfigurable Manufacturing for Semiconductors (ARMS) Ø Government / Semiconductor Industry partnership New flexible foundry technology Ø New business model Ø Ø Government-held process licenses Ø Ø No commercial conflicts Prototype / low volume production by DMEA High volume production by industry Terminal transfer to DMEA upon OEM business decision Transfers industry-developed (commercial) IP & technology Ø COTS as a solution, not a problem Ø Ensures continued Do. D supply as industry flexes with market Ø Save processes, Not parts !

Do. D / Industry Partnership Together Supporting the Warfighter Ø Boeing / F-22 Obsolescence

Do. D / Industry Partnership Together Supporting the Warfighter Ø Boeing / F-22 Obsolescence Problem Custom power management device no longer available Ø Used throughout the weapon system Ø Multi-year production requirement Ø Ø Ø 500 parts / year X 10 years Part for Part solution determined the best value Ø Requested DMEA’s ARMS Foundry Support Ø Solution - DMEA & Boeing “Cooperative Research And Development Agreement” (CRADA) DMEA / Boeing worked together on developing new IC Ø DMEA provided design engineering Ø DMEA tested & delivered new IC Ø

DMEA B 2 Support Ø B-2 Defensive Management System (DMS) unsupportable Ø DMSMS plus

DMEA B 2 Support Ø B-2 Defensive Management System (DMS) unsupportable Ø DMSMS plus lack of repair procedures, lack of tech data, spares, etc Ø Prime Contractor wanted $54 M to redesign system Ø DMEA Proposed $22 M to make supportable for next 10 years Ø DMEA performing System-level DMS Supportability Improvement Program Ø Ø Ø System level assessment IC / board / box solution strategies Reverse engineering Solution design, prototype, and test Cost avoidance = $32 Million

Do. D / Industry Partnership Evolved Sea Sparrow Missile (ESSM) Raytheon / ESSM Obsolescence

Do. D / Industry Partnership Evolved Sea Sparrow Missile (ESSM) Raytheon / ESSM Obsolescence and R&M Problems Ø Obsolete Custom Microprocessor & Interface Logic Devices Ø Impacts future production of Missile Borne Computer (MBC) Subsystem Ø Requested DMEA’s Support to Eliminate Obsolescence Ø Ø DMEA Provided 3 Options Navy and Raytheon decided to improve R&M, and testability, as well as resolve DMS Ø DMEA to redesign 6 boards and 2 ASIC’s Ø Microprocessor & Interface Logic redesign Ø Technology Compression to replace other ICs & develop new FFF MBC Subsystem Ø DMEA / Raytheon to Integrate & Test new MBC Ø Cost Avoidance of $20, 000 Ø