Full Mission Simulation Report University of Minnesota Alexander

  • Slides: 22
Download presentation
Full Mission Simulation Report University of Minnesota Alexander Richman Jacob Schultz Justine Topel Will

Full Mission Simulation Report University of Minnesota Alexander Richman Jacob Schultz Justine Topel Will Thorson 4/23/2012 Rock. Sat-C 2012 SITR

Mission Overview • Our mission is to demonstrate the feasibility of using active noise

Mission Overview • Our mission is to demonstrate the feasibility of using active noise cancellation on board a rocket for future experiments. Rock. Sat-C 2012 SITR 2

Mission Overview • Our mission is to demonstrate the feasibility of using active noise

Mission Overview • Our mission is to demonstrate the feasibility of using active noise cancellation on board a rocket for future experiments. • We tested the impact g force on the structure without the onboard electronics because we still needed to complete a couple of the mounts and had to send the payload in to the shop to be modified. – The shop required the payload right away if we were to be able to get everything completed as soon as possible Rock. Sat-C 2012 SITR 3

Mechanical/Structure • The structure was slightly too large in diameter to fit in the

Mechanical/Structure • The structure was slightly too large in diameter to fit in the canister. It has been taken back to the shop to be fitted properly. • We also had to mill some holes in the canisters for running wires to connect all of the electronics throughout the payload. • The integration procedure is a bottom up approach. The assembly starts with the bottom plate and build on top of it. Rock. Sat-C 2012 SITR 4

Mechanical/Structure cont. • We have a parts list and understand there will not be

Mechanical/Structure cont. • We have a parts list and understand there will not be a machine shop at Wallops • Our ballast for ensuring we have proper weight is weighted tape which can be found in golf stores. • The exact weight of the payload will be determined when we get it back from the shop with the modifications. Rock. Sat-C 2012 SITR 5

Mechanical/Structure cont. • We tested the impact g force on the structure without the

Mechanical/Structure cont. • We tested the impact g force on the structure without the onboard electronics because we still needed to complete a couple of the mounts and had to send the payload in to the shop to be modified. • The shop required the payload right away if we were to be able to get everything completed as soon as possible Rock. Sat-C 2012 SITR 6

Mechanical/Structure • For the test readiness review we have to test the vibrational durability

Mechanical/Structure • For the test readiness review we have to test the vibrational durability of the electronics and their new mounts in the structure. • We also have to get the final weight and properly ballast it. Rock. Sat-C 2012 SITR 7

Electrical/CDH Standoff Mic 1 Mic 2 Dummy System ANC System Battery Power Design overview:

Electrical/CDH Standoff Mic 1 Mic 2 Dummy System ANC System Battery Power Design overview: We have two identical chambers. The power supply, consisting of the battery and regulating circuit supplies power to both mics, the ANC system, the data logger and our filters. The mic signal is passed through the active filter/preamps and into the data logger. Filters Data logger Rock. Sat-C 2012 SITR 8

Power Supply Subsystem Overview • We will be using the power supply that was

Power Supply Subsystem Overview • We will be using the power supply that was flown last year. The power supply is in working condition and, with the new batteries we ordered, will be ready for flight. Rock. Sat-C 2012 SITR 9

Power (EPS) • Power supply has been tested • Tests conducted – 1 hour

Power (EPS) • Power supply has been tested • Tests conducted – 1 hour – See if it powers everything – Does is power everything? Yes -> Success • When NASA connects the activation switch (Winchester switch), all subsystems will activate. Rock. Sat-C 2012 SITR 10

Power (EPS) • We had two new battery packs made. • We have done

Power (EPS) • We had two new battery packs made. • We have done testing recently using a plug-in power supply. • We have to add a voltage divider/regulator to our development board for powering the microphones and ANC system. Rock. Sat-C 2012 SITR 11

Data Logger Subsystem Overview • We will be using the data logger that was

Data Logger Subsystem Overview • We will be using the data logger that was flown last year. The data logger works, but we are adding low pass filters and a microphone preamp on the input side. Rock. Sat-C 2012 SITR 12

Electrical/CDH • The data collection system is working and we are getting data that

Electrical/CDH • The data collection system is working and we are getting data that is sensible from running tests. • Tests conducted – Short Duration: 1 -5 seconds – To see if there is a difference between the noise power between experimental and control methods – Power spectral analysis was used to determine success – We have seen a 3 d. B reduction in noise at this point (more on this later) • Integration is still taking place. We are working on combining all of the things and don’t foresee any issues. Rock. Sat-C 2012 SITR 13

Filtered Test Results • The following graph shows the decibel level of attenuation from

Filtered Test Results • The following graph shows the decibel level of attenuation from our ANC tests. – Data processed by bandpass filtering the control and test spectrum in 100 Hz increments, breaking down how effective the attenuation is by frequency. – Midpoints plotted, ex: 300 -400 Hz band is marked by 350 Hz on the plot Rock. Sat-C 2012 SITR 14

ANC Filtered Test Results Noise Attenuation (d. B) versus Frequency 0 200 300 400

ANC Filtered Test Results Noise Attenuation (d. B) versus Frequency 0 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 The graph to the left shows a reduction in noise as measured in d. B. This is a good result and shows that the system is working. We hope that it will be even better after adding the filter/preamp. -0. 5 Attenuation -1 -1. 5 -2 -2. 5 -3 1000 Frequency (Hz) Rock. Sat-C 2012 SITR 15

Audio Spectrum Results – Test(Red) Control(Blue) The fft shows a clear reduction in noise

Audio Spectrum Results – Test(Red) Control(Blue) The fft shows a clear reduction in noise using the ANC system. The blue is the control case. Rock. Sat-C 2012 SITR 16

Test Summary • Everything worked as planned. • All electronics communicated – The data

Test Summary • Everything worked as planned. • All electronics communicated – The data logger saw the audio signal – Reasonable data was seen • Sensors may need some calibration for robustness, although it is not essential Rock. Sat-C 2012 SITR 17

Action Item Summary • In the next week we are expecting to get shipments

Action Item Summary • In the next week we are expecting to get shipments in with the parts for the filters and run tests with them and the data logger making sure everything interfaces correctly • By the week after we expect to have the payload with all of the mounts and able to properly fit in the canister. We will put everything together and perform vibrational testing with a sub woofer. Rock. Sat-C 2012 SITR 18

Pictures Payload structure Rock. Sat-C 2012 SITR 19

Pictures Payload structure Rock. Sat-C 2012 SITR 19

Pictures cont. Microphone and speaker Data logger Power supply Rock. Sat-C 2012 SITR 20

Pictures cont. Microphone and speaker Data logger Power supply Rock. Sat-C 2012 SITR 20

Conclusions • We are finishing work on fixing all of the issues which popped

Conclusions • We are finishing work on fixing all of the issues which popped up during full system integration and mission testing. • We have some work to do but we still believe we will be ready to fly by launch. Rock. Sat-C 2012 SITR 21

Appendix • Extra/additional data plots • Additional data not immediately relevant to presentation Rock.

Appendix • Extra/additional data plots • Additional data not immediately relevant to presentation Rock. Sat-C 2012 SITR