Minnesota Handwriting Assessment Jeffrey Arnold Morgan Vaughan Key

  • Slides: 18
Download presentation
Minnesota Handwriting Assessment Jeffrey Arnold & Morgan Vaughan

Minnesota Handwriting Assessment Jeffrey Arnold & Morgan Vaughan

Key Characteristics �Purpose �To quantify selected aspects of young student’s handwriting �Used to support

Key Characteristics �Purpose �To quantify selected aspects of young student’s handwriting �Used to support or reject teachers subjective judgment of poor quality or slow rate handwriting in students �Age �Second semester 1 st graders and 2 nd graders

Frame of Reference most likely used guiding selection of this tool �Biomechanical �Developmental �PEO

Frame of Reference most likely used guiding selection of this tool �Biomechanical �Developmental �PEO

Bottom-Up Approach

Bottom-Up Approach

Test Development and Standardization �Test development �Literature reviews �Consultation with teachers �Standardization sample �n

Test Development and Standardization �Test development �Literature reviews �Consultation with teachers �Standardization sample �n = 2, 000 � 11 different states �Second semester 1 st graders and 2 nd graders

Domains �Rate – how fast the child writes �Legibility – how readable is a

Domains �Rate – how fast the child writes �Legibility – how readable is a letter? �Form – does the letter make the shape it is supposed to with all lines connect, and all straight lines straight, and curved lines curved. �Alignment – does the letter rest within 1/16 above or below the base line? �Size – how big or small the letters are? �Spacing – how far apart or close together are the letters?

Psychometric Properties (Reliability) �Interrater �Pearson Correlation (. 77. 88) �Intrarater �Fisher’s Z �Rate –

Psychometric Properties (Reliability) �Interrater �Pearson Correlation (. 77. 88) �Intrarater �Fisher’s Z �Rate – 1. 00 �Legibility -. 96 �Form and spacing -. 97 �Alignment and �Test-retest �Rate – 71% �Legibility 64% �Form – 75% �Alignment - 86% �Size – 82% �Spacing – 76%

Psychometric Properties – Validity �Content �Based on literature reviews and consultation with primary grade

Psychometric Properties – Validity �Content �Based on literature reviews and consultation with primary grade teachers �Construct �Manual does not explain but the explanation for content validity explains the construct as well �Criterion �Concurrent – measured using the Test of Visual Motor Skills �Strong association between first graders and students in special education with no

Measurement concerns �Scores are subjective because they are based on the facilitator’s judgment of

Measurement concerns �Scores are subjective because they are based on the facilitator’s judgment of the handwriting. �Only inclusion criteria: �Child must be in 1 st or 2 nd grade �No exclusion criteria

Test Length � 10 -15 minutes for total administration and scoring. � 2. 5

Test Length � 10 -15 minutes for total administration and scoring. � 2. 5 minutes to determine Rate �Child can finish sentence for legibility score.

Test Cost �Starter kit - $87. 00 �Manual � 1 D’Nealian pad � 1

Test Cost �Starter kit - $87. 00 �Manual � 1 D’Nealian pad � 1 Manuscript pad �Each pad has 25 sheets �Clear 6 inch ruler �Print pads $25 – �package of 4 pads of 25 sheets for each D’Nealian and Manuscript print pads

Testing Procedures �Have student seated at a desk or table of appropriate height for

Testing Procedures �Have student seated at a desk or table of appropriate height for their size �Lighting and ventilations should be appropriate and comfortable �Choose appropriate stimulus sheet (D’Nealian or Manuscript) depending on handwriting style practiced in the classroom. �Time the test for 2 ½ minutes to establish rate score. �If the student did not finish the sentence give additional time to finish the words to score the 5 quality categories

Test Items

Test Items

Scoring

Scoring

Scoring Interpretation �Like Peers Level is equivalent to scoring in the top 75% of

Scoring Interpretation �Like Peers Level is equivalent to scoring in the top 75% of the range of students. �Somewhat Below Peers Level is equivalent to the bottom 5%-25% of the range of students. �These students should be monitored to determine the underlying problem. �Well Below Peers Level is equivalent to the bottom 5% of the range of students. �These students should be sent for an evaluation to determine the underlying problem.

Test results

Test results

Area(s) of occupation addressed �Education �MHA is best administered in a school setting.

Area(s) of occupation addressed �Education �MHA is best administered in a school setting.

Reference Asher, I. E. (Ed. ). (2014). Asher’s Occupational Therapy Assessment Tools (4 th

Reference Asher, I. E. (Ed. ). (2014). Asher’s Occupational Therapy Assessment Tools (4 th ed. ). Bethesda, MD: AOTA Press. Reisman, J. (1999). Minnesota Handwriting Assessment. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.