Florida Guardian ad Litem Program Termination of Parental
- Slides: 49
Florida Guardian ad Litem Program Termination of Parental Rights Regional Training 2007
TPR = Statutory Ground (+) MBI (+) LRM • Clear & Convincing Evidence • TPR Grounds Exist • Manifest Best Interests • Least Restrictive Means
TPR Statutory Grounds § 39. 806 • Voluntary Surrender • Abandonment a b • Conduct towards child and continued involvement threatens life, safety, wellbeing irrespective of services c • Incarceration d
TPR Statutory Grounds§ 39. 806 • Case Plan Filed, Approved and Child Continues to be Abused e • Egregious conduct; failure to prevent egregious conduct, that threatens the life, safety, or physical, mental or emotional health of the child or the child’s sibling f
TPR Statutory Grounds § 39. 806 • Subjected child to Aggravated Child Abuse, g Sexual Battery, Sexual Abuse or Chronic Abuse • Committed Murder or Voluntary Manslaughter of a Child h • Involuntary TPR of a Sibling i
Review the Petition
Review the TPR Petition with Team Be sure petition contains facts alleging: • Grounds for TPR • Parents informed of right to counsel • Child dependent (if required) • Manifest Best Interests
Grounds for Termination of Parental Rights
a Voluntary Surrender § 39. 806(1)(a) • Written • Consent • Department to take custody • Not under fraud or duress
b Abandonment § 39. 806(1)(b) • While being able; AND • No effort to support; AND • No communication; OR • Marginal efforts at parenting = sufficient to evince a willful rejection of parental obligation OR
Abandonment § 39. 806(1)(b) Continued • Location of parent unknown • Cannot be ascertained by diligent search • Within 60 days
Abandonment § 39. 806(1)(b) Continued • Incarceration may only be a FACTOR to consider “together with other facts” including: • Multiple and habitual • Heinous nature of crime • Long incarceration foreseeable
c Conduct towards child and continued involvement threatens life, safety, well -being despite services § 39. 806(1)(c) • Provision of services; AND • Harm; AND • Futility – no reasonable basis to believe parent would improve • Do not need dependency adjudication or 12 months
d Incarceration § 39. 806(1)(d) • Substantial portion of child’s remaining minority § 39. 806(1)(d)1; OR • Certain crimes § 39. 806(1)(d)2; OR • Continued parent child relationship harmful to child § 39. 806(1)(d)3
Incarceration § 39. 806(1)(d) • What is Substantial Period of Time? • 25 - 32 percent of child minority is not substantial portion • B. C. v. Florida Dept. of Children and Families, 887 So. 2 d 1046 (Fla. 2004)
e Child continues to be abused, neglected, or abandoned by the parents. § 39. 806(1)(e) • Adjudicated dependent; AND • Case Plan filed; AND • 12 or more months • Failure to substantially comply; OR • Material Breach § 39. 806 (1)(e)2
Failure cannot be because of: • Parent’s lack of financial resources • Department’s failure to make reasonable efforts to reunify
f Definitions • Sibling means another child who resides with or is cared for by the parent regardless of whether the child is related • Egregious means deplorable, flagrant, or outrageous. Can be only once if such intensity, magnitude, or severity as to endanger the life of the child.
f Egregious conduct, or had the opportunity and capability to prevent and knowingly failed to prevent egregious conduct that threatens the life, safety, or physical, mental or emotional health of the child or the child’s sibling § 39. 806(1)(f)
Egregious Conduct • Must have hurt the child or put the child at imminent risk of harm • Commit or failed to prevent • Knew of previous abuse and did nothing
Egregious Conduct Failure to Protect Can be Enough
Egregious Conduct Towards Sibling Nexus Required • Nexus is required between the abuse of one child and the prospective abuse of a sibling
g Aggravated child abuse; sexual battery or sexual abuse; or chronic abuse § 39. 806(1)(g) • Aggravated child abuse defined in § 827. 03 • Sexual battery or sexual abuse defined in § 39. 01 • Chronic abuse defined in In re D. A. D. “long duration or frequent occurrence” “always present or encountered” and “being such habitually”
h Committed murder or voluntary manslaughter of a child § 39. 806(1)(h)
i Involuntary TPR of sibling § 39. 806(1)(i) • Prior involuntary TPR of sibling • Substantial risk of significant harm
Single Parent Terminations • Even if a two (or more) parent termination, be sure that evidence supports a TPR as to each and every parent • Final order should contain findings to support single parent termination
Single Parent Terminations Best Practice • Request that the court make findings under Section 39. 811(6) as to each parent in all cases, if it can be supported by record/evidence • Review Single Parent TPR training available on the website www. Guardianadlitem. org
Manifest Best Interest
Manifest Best Interest (MBI) • Court must make specific finding that TPR is in the child’s manifest best interest § 39. 810(1)-(11) • The final judgment is subject to reversal if no MBI on the record
Manifest Best Interest (MBI) • Each child individually • Review MBI questions with GAL • If consent by default still need MBI testimony • Not a comparison between placement and parents
Manifest Best Interest 1. The availability of a suitable relative exists who is not willing to adopt but who is willing to provide a permanent placement § 39. 810(1) 2. The ability and disposition of the parent or parents to provide the child with food, clothing, medical care … and other material needs of the child § 39. 810(2)
Manifest Best Interest 3. The capacity of the parent or parents to care for the child …§ 39. 810(3) 4. The present …needs of the child and … future needs§ 39. 810(4) 5. [E]motional ties …harm to the child …from the termination of parental rights. . . § 39. 810(5)
Manifest Best Interest 6. The likelihood of an older child remaining in longterm foster care § 39. 810(6) 7. Bond between child and “parental substitute” § 39. 810(7) 8. The length of time that the child has lived in placement and desire for continuity § 39. 810(8)
Manifest Best Interest 9. The depth of the relationship existing between the child and the present custodian§ 39. 810(9) 10. Child’s wishes § 39. 810(10) 11. Guardian ad Litem recommendations§ 39. 810(11)
Least Restrictive Means
Least Restrictive Means Padgett Test • Good faith effort to rehabilitate the parent and reunite the family • Measures short of termination should be utilized if … can permit the safe re-establishment of the parent-child bond
Least Restrictive Means Padgett Test “Relative Issue” goes only to MBI not Least Restrictive Means
Most Common Reversals Insufficient evidence of harm • Evidence not Clear and Convincing • GAL testimony insufficient • Therapist testimony not provided
Most Common Reversals Insufficient Evidence of Provision of Services • Incarceration Cases • Mental Illness
Common Issues Proving Harm • Bad acts alone are not enough • Substance abuse without harm not enough
Common Issues Proving Harm (Continued) • GAL testimony (improvements since removal) • Developmental delays • Medical problems • Educational problems • Therapist testimony
Common Issues Domestic Violence • Child is a witness of physical or verbal abuse • May not have to show that child witnessed the D. V – only that the child was affected by D. V. • Child is aware of DV www. guardianadlitem. org for complete DV explanation
Common Issues Hearsay • If it is reliable and trustworthy + child testifies (subject to cross-examination), or • If it is reliable and trustworthy + child does not testify + there is other corroborating evidence • See Evidence Training on www. guardianadlitem. org for full explanation
Post Trial Issues • Timely submission of final judgment • Accuracy of final judgment • Grounds • Manifest Best Interests • Least Restrictive Means • Findings as to Single Parent
Appeals • Notify Appellate Team of Appeals
TPR Training Materials Go to the P Drive to find TPR Training Power Point Presentation TPR Checklist TPR Evidence Chart MBI Chart TPR Grounds Case Summaries
www. Guardianad. Litem. org Resources By Topic Conferences & Training
www. Guardianad. Litem. org Searchable Case Summaries Case Summary by Topic Sign up to receive Legal Briefs Newsletter
- Termination of parental rights maine
- Contrle parental
- Contrle parental program
- Mobile guardian
- Finding nemo call to adventure
- How to cite the guardian apa
- Es verdad no es un cuento hay un angel guardian
- No duerme el que cuida a israel
- Threshold guardian archetype
- Herald archetype examples
- Guardian cancer policy
- Russell and atwell guardian
- Giant worldwide 5 voices test
- Guardian schools jobs
- Guardian consonant
- The guardian
- Qué es metáfora
- Nt myers briggs
- Poetic devices in beowulf
- Where was tim winton born
- Rave mobile safety app
- Psc-cuny welfare fund retirees
- Who is the threshold guardian in the lion king
- Guardian rfid compliance monitor
- Threshold guardian
- Office of public guardian nebraska
- Angel of god my guardian dear
- Hypro esi nozzle chart
- Caldicott guardian manual
- The crossroads archetype examples
- Amy baker parental alienation
- What does burnout feel like
- Recombinant vs parental
- Parental care in amphibians
- Mid parental height plotting
- Ma tefra
- Parental vs recombinant
- Programas de educación parental
- Akuakultur
- Bt parental pin
- Crisis familiares ejemplos
- Acas paternity leave
- Male parental investment
- Parental surveillance
- Parental alienation lawyer logan county
- Ejercicio de la responsabilidad parental
- Parental capacity example
- Pedigree chart symbols
- Six types of parental involvement
- Ciclo vital familiar