Eskom group annual results for the year ended

  • Slides: 31
Download presentation
Eskom group annual results for the year ended 31 March 2019 30 July 2019

Eskom group annual results for the year ended 31 March 2019 30 July 2019 The results presentation is available at www. eskom. co. za/IR 2019

Contents High-level overview Operational performance Financial performance Future financial position Turnaround plan Conclusion 1

Contents High-level overview Operational performance Financial performance Future financial position Turnaround plan Conclusion 1

High-level overview

High-level overview

Driving turnaround for sustainability • Disappointing results with declining financial, operational and environmental performance

Driving turnaround for sustainability • Disappointing results with declining financial, operational and environmental performance • Encouraging progress to instil governance and to root out financial mismanagement, malfeasance and maladministration • Generation nine-point recovery programme realises positive results in plant performance through winter, with no loadshedding since 24 March 2019 • Government financial support arrests short-term liquidity concerns and relieves financial pressure • Turnaround strategy to stabilise, separate and grow the company for financial and operational sustainability remains urgent • It is critical to create a country energy plan as the next few years pose 3

Overview of results • Net loss after tax of R 21 billion • 30

Overview of results • Net loss after tax of R 21 billion • 30 days of rotational loadshedding • Industrial action further impacts operations and finance • Generation energy availability factor (EAF) at 70% • Total spend on diesel-generated power of R 6. 5 billion to minimise the magnitude of loadshedding (Eskom and independent power producers) • Municipal arrear debt rose to R 20 billion • Environmental performance deteriorates further • Leadership stability with Chief Operating and Chief Financial Officers appointed 4

Operational performance

Operational performance

Network performance stable as generating plant performance declines Coal plant availability & utilisation %

Network performance stable as generating plant performance declines Coal plant availability & utilisation % 93 93 EAF 93 EUF 90 83 75 72 81 75 70 68 2014 2015 2016 67 2018 2019 Network performance System minutes lost for events < 1 minute SAIFI Events/hours 40 SAIDI Minutes 4. 0 35 3. 5 30 3. 0 25 2. 5 20 2. 0 15 10 • Generation EAF declined from 78% to 70% • Coal plant EAF declined from 75% to 67% - energy utilisation factor (EUF) increasing to 90% from 81%; average plant life > 37 years • Transmission and Distribution networks show stable performance • 540 MVA transformer capacity installed; 379 km of high-voltage transmission lines commissioned • Coal stock levels improve over the period 2015 2016 2017 2018 1. System average interruption frequency index 2019 1. 5 2. System average interruption duration index 6

Environmental and safety performance declines, socio-economic performance stable • Increase water consumption and deteriorating

Environmental and safety performance declines, socio-economic performance stable • Increase water consumption and deteriorating particulate emissions • 191 585 new households connected (2018: 215 519) • Lost-time injury rate of 0. 31 (2018: 0. 24). Regrettably, three employee fatalities (2018: three) and three contractor fatalities (2018: 11) • B-BBEE attributable spend of R 85 billion • Spend with black-owned suppliers of R 52 billion • Racial, gender and disability equity improved, albeit small Environmental performance kg/MWh sent out 0, 48 0, 46 0, 44 0, 42 0, 40 0, 38 0, 36 0, 34 0, 32 0, 30 0, 28 0, 00 l/k. Wh sent out Relative particulate emissions Water concumption 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Electrification (number – 000’s) Annual 220 Annual Cumulative 1 400 Cummulative 1 200 1 000 180 800 160 600 140 400 120 100 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 0 7

Financial performance

Financial performance

Overview of financial performance • EBITDA of R 31. 5 billion (2018: R 45.

Overview of financial performance • EBITDA of R 31. 5 billion (2018: R 45. 4 billion) • Cost savings of R 9. 9 billion achieved, but absorbed by cost overruns to minimise loadshedding • Net loss after tax of R 20. 7 billion (2018: R 2. 3 billion) • Net cash from operations of R 32. 7 billion (2018: R 37. 6 billion) • 58% of funding requirement for 2020 secured to date • Audit opinion: o Material uncertainty regarding Eskom’s status as a going concern o Modified audit opinion relating to PFMA 9

Process to manage irregular, fruitless and wasteful expenses improved; more work required R billion

Process to manage irregular, fruitless and wasteful expenses improved; more work required R billion 1. 5 Outstanding issues 1. 1 0. 9 25. 7 1. 7 21. 0 Openin g balance 3. 4 Prior Existing IE New Condoned. Recovered Closin year IE g (clean(2019) balanc up) e Irregular expenses Number R million Exceed monetary threshold 1 170 Sole source 3 327 Consignment stock 1 488 Tender process 2 161 Other 175 377 Total 182 1 524 • Request permission from National Treasury to accept electronic BBBEE certificates • Improve management of panels and lifecycle management of contracts • Enhance information system to accurately report on designated sectors • Obtain condonation from National Treasury to clear closing balance 10

Decline in EBITDA and net loss recorded Income statement R billion Revenue Other income

Decline in EBITDA and net loss recorded Income statement R billion Revenue Other income Primary energy Net employee benefit expenses Net impairment loss Other expenses EBITDA March 2019 March 2018 Yo. Y % change 180 2 (99) 177 1 (85) 3 ~ (17) (33) (29) (13) (18) ~ - 31 45 (31) (30) (23) (29) Depreciation and amortisation expenses Net fair value loss on financial instruments and embedded derivatives Net finance cost Loss before tax Income tax (3) (2) ~ (28) (29) 8 (23) (3) – (19) ~ ~ Net loss for the year (21) (2) ~ • Revenue: negatively impacted by IFRS 15 and pre-commissioning capitalisation • Primary energy cost: higher OCGT utilisation, higher coal cost and increased IPP production • Employee benefit cost increased: wage settlement of bargaining employees • Depreciation growth: commissioning of new power station units and accelerated depreciation on Komati • Finance costs: growth in 11

Revenue before IFRS adjustments increased by 4% March 2019 March 2018 % Growth Revenue,

Revenue before IFRS adjustments increased by 4% March 2019 March 2018 % Growth Revenue, R billion Local • Other categories remain stable • International sales reduced 179 171 5 8 10 (14) Total billed revenue 187 180 4 IFRS adjustment (7) (3) Total revenue 180 177 International • Reduction in sales mainly in mining and residential categories 3 • Average price increase of 5. 8%, from 85 c/k. Wh to 90 c/k. Wh • Volume variance – (R 3 billion); price variance R 7 billion • IFRS 15 applies cash basis for defaulting customers, negatively impacting. Sales revenue and revenue TWh R billion Sales, TWh Local 196 197 (0. 5) International 12 15 (18. 4) Total sales 208 212 (1. 8) 180 175 170 165 160 155 150 145 140 0 250 200 Sales (TWh) Revenue (Rbn) 150 100 50 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 0 12

Primary energy cost increased by 17% • Eskom production volume reduced and renewable IPP

Primary energy cost increased by 17% • Eskom production volume reduced and renewable IPP production volume increased • Total (Eskom and IPP) OCGT cost of R 6. 5 billion, an increase of R 5. 9 billion • Renewable IPPs is 4. 8% of total production and 22% of total cost • Eskom total cost increased by R 7. 8 billion • Renewable IPP cost increased by R 3. 2 billion and IPP OCGTs by R 2. 4 billion Cost increase, R billion Volume Price Actual 2018 85 Coal 1 Nuclear Eskom OCGTs 6 5 00 0 3 Renewables 13 3 13 IPP OCGTs 1 1 2 International 1 1 0 Actual 2019 99 13

Debt exceeding R 440 billion March 2019 March 2018 Yo. Y % change Property,

Debt exceeding R 440 billion March 2019 March 2018 Yo. Y % change Property, plant and equipment and intangible assets 656 635 3 Working capital 50 46 9 Liquid assets 12 24 (52) Other assets 41 32 18 Total assets 758 739 3 Equity 153 170 (10) Debt securities and borrowings 441 389 13 Working capital 49 44 12 Other liabilities 115 136 (16) Total equity and liabilities 758 739 3 Financial position, R billion 14

Cash from operations not sufficient to service debt March 2019 33 Cash flow statement,

Cash from operations not sufficient to service debt March 2019 33 Cash flow statement, R billion Net cash from operating activities March Yo. Y % 2018 change 38 (13) Cash required for debt servicing (69) (44) (60) Net cash movement before investment activities (36) (7) ~ Cash flow used in investment activities (36) 58 (14) (55) 58 (4) 35 ~ ~ Cash flow from financing activities Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents Substantial increase in cash required for debt servicing, R billion 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2014 Capex Debt Servicing 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 15

Most financial ratios deteriorated and are expected to deteriorate further before improving Profitability Ratio

Most financial ratios deteriorated and are expected to deteriorate further before improving Profitability Ratio March 2019 2018 EBITDA margin, % 18 26 Cash interest cover, ratio 0. 9 1. 2 Debt service cover, ratio 0. 5 0. 9 Gross debt/EBITDA, ratio 15. 6 40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 -30 Debt/equity (including longterm provisions), ratio 3. 1 Gearing, % 76 Free funds from operations after interest as % of gross debt, % 9. 7 2. 5 EBITDA (Rbn) Net profit before tax (Rbn) EBITDA margin (%) 50 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Cash from operations (1) Cash from operations, Rbn Cash interest cov, ratio DSCR, ratio 72 50 45 2 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 16 0

Reduction in capital expenditure Total Eskom funded capital expenditure, R billion 70 Other (Rbn)

Reduction in capital expenditure Total Eskom funded capital expenditure, R billion 70 Other (Rbn) Existing asset base (Rbn) New asset base (Rbn) 70 65 60 55 52 56 48 50 47 45 40 34 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 2014 2015 R billion 2016 2017 2018 2019 2018 Medupi 4. 9 7. 0 Kusile 8. 6 13. 2 Total 13. 5 20. 2 • Total Eskom group funded capital of R 34 billion (2018: R 47 billion), with R 20 billion used to expand the asset base and R 13 billion spent on existing assets • Department of Energy funded electrification capex of R 2. 8 billion (not shown in graph) 17

Municipality and Soweto debt increase Invoiced municipal arrear debt, R billion 20 % Arrear

Municipality and Soweto debt increase Invoiced municipal arrear debt, R billion 20 % Arrear Municipal debt (Rbn) Municipal payment levels (%) 15 10 5 0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Soweto small power user (SPU) debt, R billion % Soweto SPU arrear debt (Rbn) 20 Soweto SPU payment levels (%) 15 10 5 0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 • Invoiced municipal arrear debt (including interest) increased by R 6. 3 billion, to R 19. 9 billion • Current payment level of 81% by municipalities (excluding metros) • Invoiced Soweto SPU arrear debt (including interest) increased to R 18 billion (2018: R 15 billion); payment level of 12. 5% • Other overdue debt amounting to R 2. 5 billion, including R 0. 8 billion for international customers • Working with Inter-Ministerial Task Team to address municipal debt • Liaising with communities in Soweto to address the non-payment culture; legal action taken against customers 18

Eskom secures 58% of funding for 2020 financial year-to-date (at 30 June 2019) R

Eskom secures 58% of funding for 2020 financial year-to-date (at 30 June 2019) R billion DFIs ECAs International bonds Domestic bonds and notes > 1 year Domestic bonds and notes < 1 year Structured products Bank funding Total funding 1 % secured Actual Funding funding plan 2019 2020 Committed 10. 5 21. 6 26. 7 5. 4 - 22. 9 0. 3 – 9. 0 6. 1 3. 2 3. 6 1. 0 0. 5 15. 0 7. 0 – 3. 0 63. 3 Guarantee utilisation allocation R billion 350 279 Total Governmen t Guarantee Drawndown 52 19 Committed not drawndown Available Nominal maturities of guaranteed debt R billion 46. 2 26. 9 58% 28 23 25 2022 2023 7 1. Gross of commercial paper 2020 2021 19

Eskom revenue process with NERSA results in non-cost-reflective tariff determination • Lodged reviews of

Eskom revenue process with NERSA results in non-cost-reflective tariff determination • Lodged reviews of previous NERSA decisions on the 2015, 2016, 2017 RCA determinations o NERSA revenue decision (5. 23%) for 2019 • NERSA RCA decision for 2018 o NERSA made a decision of R 3. 9 billion in response to an application of R 21. 6 billion o The reasons for the decision still to be published • NERSA MYPD 4 decision (2020 – 2022) o Decision of 9. 41% average increase implemented together with the R 8 billion RCA recovery, resulting in 13. 87% average increase o The return on assets reduced with the R 23 billion Government support, resulting in a negative return on assets o Reasons for the decision still to be published • Eskom will submit an RCA application for 2019 of around R 27 billion 20

Future financial position

Future financial position

Results for 2020 expected to be similar, before improvements materialise March 2019 March 2020

Results for 2020 expected to be similar, before improvements materialise March 2019 March 2020 Revenue, R billion 180 207 EBITDA, R billion 31 34 EBITDA margin, % 18 17 Net loss after tax, R billion 1 (21) (20) Cash interest cover, ratio 0. 9 0. 7 Debt service cover, ratio 0. 5 0. 3 Financial performance Cash flow, R billion 25 84 26 23 -59 41 -5 -31 46 Cash Debt Sub-total. Investmen Debt from servicin t activities raise operation g (Net) d s 1. Before Government support Initial Sub-total Additiona Cash support l support movemen t • Results for 2020 expected to be similar to 2019 • Although EBITDA will improve, the net loss is projected to be R 20 billion, before Government support, due to an increase in net finance cost • Cash from operations not sufficient to service debt • Most ratios maintain negative trend • Continued Government support required to 22 manage liquidity

Price of electricity not sufficient to recover prudent and efficient costs • Eskom has

Price of electricity not sufficient to recover prudent and efficient costs • Eskom has three sources of funds; revenue, borrowings and shareholder support • Ideally, revenue should be sufficient to redeem the capital over the asset life time and cover the interest cost • Debt funding exceeding R 440 billion, reaching limits • Eskom has not recovered its prudent and efficient costs and a fair return for many years • The only short-term option is shareholder support • Cost savings alone will not solve Eskom’s financial health • The only long-term solution is for the electricity price to migrate to cost reflectivity NERSA determined return on assets 8 % 7 NERSA official, % NERSA allowed, % NERSA after R 23 bn, % Actual, % 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 -12014 -2 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 23

Rapid increase in price of electricity, but still not cost reflective and still low-priced

Rapid increase in price of electricity, but still not cost reflective and still low-priced Price comparison – c/k. Wh (constant 2019) Recent international tariff benchmark – US c/k. Wh 140 130 120 110 BUSA – 108 c/k. Wh EIUG – 118 c/k. Wh IRP – 116 c/k. Wh Source: Statista (October 2018) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 NERSA price path to cost-reflectivity - upper boundary NERSA price path to cost-reflectivity - lower boundary Actual ave prices Price at %ROA equal to %WACC 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 • Various studies confirmed that Eskom’s price is below efficient and prudent cost reflectiveness • Up to this point Eskom’s balance sheet has subsidised the consumer • The current reality is that this is no more possible as reflected in the results • The result is that Government support is now required to subsidise the consumer 24

Turnaround plan

Turnaround plan

Turnaround plan based on four pillars that is critical for future sustainability • Financial

Turnaround plan based on four pillars that is critical for future sustainability • Financial support from Government – Government has shown its commitment in providing liquidity in support of Eskom’s status as a going concern, and is reviewing options to optimise the balance sheet • Cost curtailment o Eskom committed to R 77 billion cumulative cash savings by 2023 o Arrest increase in customer debt and recover existing outstanding debt • Tariff increases through NERSA: Price to migrate to efficient and prudent cost reflectivity to ensure long-term financial sustainability • Restructuring of Eskom and electricity industry Debt funding Governmen t support o Appointment of Chief Restructuring Officer o Functional separation in progress Cost-reflective price o Legal separation to follow 26

Conclusion

Conclusion

In conclusion • Governance remains a key focus as we root out financial mismanagement,

In conclusion • Governance remains a key focus as we root out financial mismanagement, malfeasance, and maladministration • Continued focus on operational and environmental recovery of our generation fleet, as we enter high maintenance summer season • A cost-reflective tariff is necessary, as cost efficiencies alone cannot solve Eskom’s financial situation • The next step in Government support should look at optimising the balance sheet • Turnaround strategy to stabilise, separate and grow the entity for financial and operational sustainability remain urgent • National stakeholder involvement necessary to create country energy plan as the next few years pose tough challenges for Eskom and the energy industry 28

Eskom group annual results for the year ended 31 March 2019 30 July 2019

Eskom group annual results for the year ended 31 March 2019 30 July 2019 The results presentation is available at www. eskom. co. za/IR 2019

Disclaimer This presentation does not constitute or form part of and should not be

Disclaimer This presentation does not constitute or form part of and should not be construed as, an offer to sell, or the solicitation or invitation of any offer to buy or subscribe for or underwrite or otherwise acquire, securities of Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd (Eskom), any holding company or any of its subsidiaries in any jurisdiction or any other person, nor an inducement to enter into any investment activity. No part of this presentation, nor the fact of its distribution, should form the basis of, or be relied on in connection with, any contract or commitment or investment decision whatsoever. This presentation does not constitute a recommendation regarding any securities of Eskom or any other person. Certain statements in this presentation regarding Eskom’s business operations may constitute “forward looking statements”. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this presentation, including, without limitation, those regarding the financial position, business strategy, management plans and objectives for future operations of Eskom are forward looking statements. Forward-looking statements are not intended to be a guarantee of future results, but instead constitute Eskom’s current expectations based on reasonable assumptions. Forecasted financial information is based on certain material assumptions. These assumptions include, but are not limited to continued normal levels of operating performance and electricity demand in the Customer Services, Distribution and Transmission divisions and operational performance in the Generation and Primary Energy divisions consistent with historical levels, and incremental capacity additions through the Group Capital division at investment levels and rates of return consistent with prior experience, as well as achievements of planned productivity improvements throughout the business activities. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements due to risks, uncertainties and other factors. Eskom neither intends to nor assumes any obligation to update or revise any forwardlooking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In preparation of this document certain publicly available data was used. While the sources used are generally regarded as reliable the content has not been verified. Eskom does not accept any responsibility for using any such information. 30