Deep Inelastic cross section for the DVCS experiment
- Slides: 17
Deep Inelastic cross section for the DVCS experiment Maxime DEFURNE CEA-DSM-Irfu-SPh. N 1
Why Deep Inelastic Scattering • During the most part of the DVCS experiment, Trigger = Cerenkov + Scintillator 2 • Extraction of DIS cross section to check the HRS, its experimental data and globally the quality of the runs. 2
Extraction Correction Estimation of systematic error Cerenkov Efficiency 99. 5% 1% S 2 Efficiency 99. 9% Negligible Multi-track events Deadtime Charge About 10% Between 7% and 25% 3700 C 0. 9% 3
Deadtime correction • Huge unstability of deadtime! That’s why correction applied run by run. 4
Selection of good events • Simulated acceptance of HRS ->Cuts defined by the match between experiment and simulation. • Contamination by pions ->Cut on the energy deposit in the pion rejector. 5
6
Cut on pion rejector • Necessary to remove contamination from pions which can represent about 10% of events. 7
Computed cross section • Use the simulation of the HRS acceptance from the experiment E 97110 with updated transport functions. • Use a program from Alexandre Deur to calculate DIS cross section from structure functions of proton 8
Computed cross section c e E Sp S R L-H E beam E_bs s E_p r ato lim Col Scattering Chamber 9
Computed cross section Generate a vertex (x, y, z, phi, theta) External a Generate Radiative vertex correction E_bs (x, y, z, phi, theta) External Radiative Correction E_spec Virtual Radiative Corrections Compute Cross section associated to this event Calculate E_ps Reconstruc t the vertex Test Collimator-HRS 10
Unstable deadtime -> Deadtime very unstable -> Cross section quite stable thanks to the run by run correction. 11
Miscalculated deadtime => Jump of the cross section sometimes due to miscalculated deadtime. => Is there an other way to calculate the deadtime? 12
Results Kinematics Experimental Cross section Computed Cross section Difference Kin 1 low 10. 21 9. 81 4. 1% Kin 1 high 61. 44 59. 65 3% Kin 2 low 15. 43 14. 63 5. 5% Kin 2 high 32. 66 31. 53 3. 6% Kin 3 low 8. 2 7. 57 8. 3% Kin 3 high 18. 2 17. 9 1. 7% 13
Kin 3 low • Cerenkov Threshold changed at run 8205. 14
Kin 3 low : No collimator • Extracted and computed cross section with cuts in the center of the acceptance: Computed cross section at 7. 8 nbarn/Ge. V/sr. Experimental cross section at 8. 2 nbarn/Ge. V/sr ->Reduced the difference from 10% to 4. 5 %. 15
Summary • Kin 3 low was running without collimator. • Impact on the cross section of the cerenkov threshold change. • Miscalculation of deadtime using T 5, T 7, T 10 for some specific runs. 16
Perspectives • Determine precisely the consequences of the Cerenkov threshold change. • Use Rfunction to apply better cuts on vertex. • Study the multi-tracks events correction. 17
- Elastic vs inelastic vs perfectly inelastic
- What makes some collisions elastic and others inelastic
- Deep asleep deep asleep it lies
- Deep forest towards an alternative to deep neural networks
- 深哉深哉耶穌的愛
- Explosion collision physics
- Elastic collison
- Inelastic collision examples
- Perfectly elastic collision
- Elasticity measures
- A perfectly inelastic demand schedule
- Elasticity of supply
- Perfectly inelastic demand
- Consumer surplus and producer surplus
- How do we know momentum is conserved
- Momentum between two objects
- Perfectly inelastic collision definition
- Consumer surplus inelastic demand