Culture and Organisation in a Multinational Firm Structure

  • Slides: 57
Download presentation
Culture and Organisation in a Multinational Firm

Culture and Organisation in a Multinational Firm

Structure of the presentation • Meaning of culture • Cultrural dimensions -national culture *Trompenaars

Structure of the presentation • Meaning of culture • Cultrural dimensions -national culture *Trompenaars and Hofstede -organizational culture • Case study

What’s culture? • A shared system of meanings • About groups-not about individual behavior

What’s culture? • A shared system of meanings • About groups-not about individual behavior • Learned-not inherited • Transgenerational • Patterned • Not “wright” or “wrong”

The Meaning of Culture • A Model of Culture

The Meaning of Culture • A Model of Culture

The Meaning of Culture • Culture as a Normal Distribution How Americans see the

The Meaning of Culture • Culture as a Normal Distribution How Americans see the French • arrogant • flamboyant • hierarchical • emotional French Culture STEREOTYPES How French see Americans • naive • aggressive • unprincipled • workaholic U. S. Culture STEREOTYPES

Is their one best way of managing and organising? • No! Why? • Each

Is their one best way of managing and organising? • No! Why? • Each culture has different meanings • One fact can have different meanings in different cultures • Example : the walkman • Hofstede and Trompenaars

Cultural differences : Trompenaars • • Universalism-particularism Individualism-communitarianisme Neutral-emotional Specific-diffuse Achievement-ascription Sequential-synchronic Inner-directed and

Cultural differences : Trompenaars • • Universalism-particularism Individualism-communitarianisme Neutral-emotional Specific-diffuse Achievement-ascription Sequential-synchronic Inner-directed and outer-directed

1. Universalism-Particularism Universalism Particularism • • • Flexibility • It depends on the circumstance

1. Universalism-Particularism Universalism Particularism • • • Flexibility • It depends on the circumstance • Make exeptions • At ease with ambiguity Consistency Standards and rules Clarity Uniform procedures

1. Universalism-Particularism • A Car Accident What right has your friend? A. My friend

1. Universalism-Particularism • A Car Accident What right has your friend? A. My friend has a definite right as a friend to expect me to testify to the lower figure. B. He has some right as a friend to expect me to testify to the lower figure. C. He has no right as a friend to expect me to testify to the lower figure.

2. Individualism. Communitarianism Individualism Communitarianism • I • Achieving alone • Ex. Vacations taken

2. Individualism. Communitarianism Individualism Communitarianism • I • Achieving alone • Ex. Vacations taken in pairs, even alone • We (part of a group) • Decisions taken in group • Ex. Vacations in group

3. Neutral-Affective Neutral Affective • Do not reveal what they are, thinking or feeling

3. Neutral-Affective Neutral Affective • Do not reveal what they are, thinking or feeling • Cool • Seem monotone • Physical contact = taboo • Reveal thoughts and feelings • Emotional • Heated, vital and animated • Seem dramatical

4. Specific-Diffuse Specific • Principles and behaviour independent of the person being addressed •

4. Specific-Diffuse Specific • Principles and behaviour independent of the person being addressed • Work and life are separated • Direct, to the point, purposeful in relating Diffuse • Everything depends of the context and the person • Work and private life are often very close • Indirect, seemingly aimless forms of relating

Specific culture Work Sport

Specific culture Work Sport

Diffuse Culture

Diffuse Culture

A Boss asking to paint the house • The colleague argues You don’t have

A Boss asking to paint the house • The colleague argues You don’t have to paint the house if you don’t feel like it. He is your boss in the company. Ouside the company, he has little authority. • The subordinate argues: Despite the fact that I don’t feel like it, I will paint the house anyway. He is my boss and you cannot ignore it outside your work either.

5. Achievement-Ascription What you do Who you are STATUS?

5. Achievement-Ascription What you do Who you are STATUS?

5. Achievement-Ascription Achievement • Competence determines status • Respect is based on achieving your

5. Achievement-Ascription Achievement • Competence determines status • Respect is based on achieving your job • Senior managers are of varying age Ascription • Extensive use of titles(who you are) • Respect is gained through your status (background) • Senior manager is mostly male, middle-aged and qualified by his background

6. Sequential-Synchronic Sequential • One activity at the time • Relationships are subordinate to

6. Sequential-Synchronic Sequential • One activity at the time • Relationships are subordinate to the schedule • Preference to follow initial plans • Time is measurable Synchronic • More activities at the time • Schedules are subordinate to the relationship • Follow where relationships lead • Time is like a wide ribbon

7. Inner-directed VS outer-directed Inner-directed Outer-directed • Environment is in • I am in

7. Inner-directed VS outer-directed Inner-directed Outer-directed • Environment is in • I am in control • Dominating attitude • Flexible attitude, • Discomfort when the willing to compromise environment seems out • Comfort with of control waves, cycles if these are natural

Cultural differences : Geert Hofstede • Power distance • Uncertainty avoidance • Individualism •

Cultural differences : Geert Hofstede • Power distance • Uncertainty avoidance • Individualism • mascunility

1. Power distance the extent to which power is accepted High power distance Low

1. Power distance the extent to which power is accepted High power distance Low power distance • • • Flat structure • Decentralized • Less supervisory personnel Obey blindly Steep structure Centralized A lot of supervisory personnel

2 Uncertainty avoidance High avoidance Low avoidance • High need for security • Strong

2 Uncertainty avoidance High avoidance Low avoidance • High need for security • Strong belief in experts • Important structures • More written rules • Lower labor turnover • Example: Germany Japan • Accepting risk • Life must go on Less structural • Fewer written rules • Higher labor turnover • Example: Great-Britain Denmark

3. Individualism-Collectivism Individualism Collectivism • I • Belonging to a group • Greater individual

3. Individualism-Collectivism Individualism Collectivism • I • Belonging to a group • Greater individual initiative • Less individual initiative

4. Masculinity • = dominant values are success, money and things • Earnings, recognition

4. Masculinity • = dominant values are success, money and things • Earnings, recognition and achievement is important • Independent decision makers Femininity • = dominant values are caring for others and the quality of life • Cooperation • Friendly atmosphere • Employment security • Group decision makers

Organizational culture • Definition of organizational culture • Characteristics • The interaction with national

Organizational culture • Definition of organizational culture • Characteristics • The interaction with national culture • Four categories for organizational culture

1/ Definition • Assumptions that are developed by a group through her existence •

1/ Definition • Assumptions that are developed by a group through her existence • New members should adopt this way of thinking in order to fit with the organisation • The organizational culture of a MNC can differ a lot from one country to an other

2/Characteristics of Organizational Culture Observed behavioral regularities Norms Philosophy on treatment of employees/ customers

2/Characteristics of Organizational Culture Observed behavioral regularities Norms Philosophy on treatment of employees/ customers Organizational Culture Dominant values Organizational climate Rules of employee behavior

3/ Interaction between national and organizational culture • National cultural values are significant •

3/ Interaction between national and organizational culture • National cultural values are significant • The values people bring to work can’t be changed easily

4/Four categories Equity Fulfillment-oriented Project-oriented culture INCUBATOR GUIDED MISSILE Person Emphasis Task Emphasis FAMILY

4/Four categories Equity Fulfillment-oriented Project-oriented culture INCUBATOR GUIDED MISSILE Person Emphasis Task Emphasis FAMILY Power-oriented culture EIFFEL TOWER Rule-oriented culture Hierarchy

4/Family Culture Equity Fulfillment-oriented Project-oriented culture INCUBATOR GUIDED MISSILE Person Emphasis Task Emphasis FAMILY

4/Family Culture Equity Fulfillment-oriented Project-oriented culture INCUBATOR GUIDED MISSILE Person Emphasis Task Emphasis FAMILY Power-oriented culture EIFFEL TOWER Rule-oriented culture Hierarchy

4/ Family culture • • Power-oriented culture Diffuse relationships Status is ascribed (parent figures)

4/ Family culture • • Power-oriented culture Diffuse relationships Status is ascribed (parent figures) Intuitive and error-correcting way of thinking People are seen like family members Father makes the changes Management by subjectives In conflict: do not lose your power

4/Eiffel tower culture Equity Fulfillment-oriented Project-oriented culture INCUBATOR GUIDED MISSILE Person Emphasis Task Emphasis

4/Eiffel tower culture Equity Fulfillment-oriented Project-oriented culture INCUBATOR GUIDED MISSILE Person Emphasis Task Emphasis FAMILY Power-oriented culture EIFFEL TOWER Rule-oriented culture Hierarchy

4/ eiffel tower culture • • • Role-oriented culture Specific relationships Status is ascribed

4/ eiffel tower culture • • • Role-oriented culture Specific relationships Status is ascribed to superior roles Rationally thinking People are seen like human ressources Change through rules and procedures Management by job description Criticism is accusation of irrationalism Everything is planned, structured

4/Guided missile culture Equity Fulfillment-oriented Project-oriented culture INCUBATOR GUIDED MISSILE Person Emphasis Task Emphasis

4/Guided missile culture Equity Fulfillment-oriented Project-oriented culture INCUBATOR GUIDED MISSILE Person Emphasis Task Emphasis FAMILY Power-oriented culture EIFFEL TOWER Rule-oriented culture Hierarchy

4/ Guided missile culture • • • Project-oriented culture Egalitarian and task-oriented Specific relationships

4/ Guided missile culture • • • Project-oriented culture Egalitarian and task-oriented Specific relationships Problem centered way of thinking People are seen as experts Management by objectives

4/Incubator culture Equity Fulfillment-oriented Project-oriented culture INCUBATOR GUIDED MISSILE Person Emphasis Task Emphasis FAMILY

4/Incubator culture Equity Fulfillment-oriented Project-oriented culture INCUBATOR GUIDED MISSILE Person Emphasis Task Emphasis FAMILY Power-oriented culture EIFFEL TOWER Rule-oriented culture Hierarchy

4/ Incubator culture • • Self-fulfilment oriented culture No structure Diffuse relationships Thinking is

4/ Incubator culture • • Self-fulfilment oriented culture No structure Diffuse relationships Thinking is process-oriented and creative People are seen as co-creators Change is improvised Management by enthusiasm

Egalitarian • Den • Sweden • UK Person • Ita • Bel • Spain

Egalitarian • Den • Sweden • UK Person • Ita • Bel • Spain • Ger • Fra • Kor Hierarchical • Norway • USA • Irland Task

Managing Cultural Differences Process Reconciliation Resolve cultural differences Respect Appreciate cultural differences Recognition Increase

Managing Cultural Differences Process Reconciliation Resolve cultural differences Respect Appreciate cultural differences Recognition Increase awareness of one’s own cultural perception Time

CASE Cultural Transformation at NUMMI

CASE Cultural Transformation at NUMMI

NUMMI • Joint venture between Generals Motors and Toyota • US and Japanese culture

NUMMI • Joint venture between Generals Motors and Toyota • US and Japanese culture needed mixed up • In order to get success, some differences needed to be reconciliated

Cultural Reconciliation Universalist Particularist • Obligation to report problems in order to improve system

Cultural Reconciliation Universalist Particularist • Obligation to report problems in order to improve system • Differences of opinion are accepted and valued • Flexibility of work rules • Tolerant atmosphere

Cultural Reconciliation Individualist Communitarist • Employment security • Participative decision making • Plant collective

Cultural Reconciliation Individualist Communitarist • Employment security • Participative decision making • Plant collective discipline • Managers closer to employees in order to give them support • Creation of open offices, communal cafetaria • Flat wage structure

Cultural Reconciliation Specific Diffuse • More than a workplace • Focus on quality and

Cultural Reconciliation Specific Diffuse • More than a workplace • Focus on quality and process rather than quantity • Building-trust first in order to achieve results

Cultural Reconciliation Achievement Ascription • Past achievement has no importance • More respect for

Cultural Reconciliation Achievement Ascription • Past achievement has no importance • More respect for the status of the superior

Cultural Reconciliation Sequential Synchronous • Transfer of the « just-in time » japanese type

Cultural Reconciliation Sequential Synchronous • Transfer of the « just-in time » japanese type of managment • « Pull » instead of « Push » , • Synchronisation instead of sequence

Cultural Reconciliation Inner-directed Outer-directed • Flexibility • Looking for the problem instead of someone

Cultural Reconciliation Inner-directed Outer-directed • Flexibility • Looking for the problem instead of someone responsible

Cultural Reconciliation Low uncertainty avoidance High uncertainty avoidance • No lay-off • Job security

Cultural Reconciliation Low uncertainty avoidance High uncertainty avoidance • No lay-off • Job security • More flows of information

Cultural Reconciliation Low power distance High power distance • More respect for authority

Cultural Reconciliation Low power distance High power distance • More respect for authority

NUMMI: Conclusion • Alone, Americans are much stronger than Japanese • In group the

NUMMI: Conclusion • Alone, Americans are much stronger than Japanese • In group the Japanese are much stronger than the Americans • Mix of two cultures can be beneficial for everybody • If you join two cultures and you can capture the positive points of both, you can get extraordinary results