International Accounting and Multinational Enterprises 5e By Lee

International Accounting and Multinational Enterprises 5/e By Lee H. Radebaugh and Sidney J. Gray 10/28/2020 Power. Point Presentation by Kent W. Meyer, Ph. D

Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted in Section 117 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the express written permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. Request for further information should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. The purchaser may make back-up copies for his/her use only and not for distribution or resale. The publisher assumes no responsibility for errors, omissions, or damages, caused by the use of these programs or from the use of the information contained herein.

Global Harmonization of Accounting and Reporting Chapter Six

Introduction International pressures for improvement in the comparability of accounting and information disclosures arise from the diverse interests and concerns of participant groups and organizations. Underlying these pressures is the fundamental belief that improved comparability will facilitate more informed international comparisons of corporate performance and prospects, with consequent economic benefits. 1

Harmonization vs. Standardization Harmonization: u u u Flexible; Allows for “domestic” financial culture; and Foreign Direct Investment (FDI). Standardization: u u u Tendency to view financial data from a “home country” perspective; Necessary familiarity with foreign accounting principles; and Comparability and harmonization. 2

Major Participant Groups u u u Governments Trade Unions and Employees Investors and Financial Analysts Bankers and Lenders Accountants and Auditors 3

Environmental Influences on Accounting International trade unions organizations International intergovernmental organizations Home country: National influences Multinational Corporations: Accounting and Information Disclosure Practices International banking, financial, and business organizations Foreign host countries: National influences International professional accounting organizations International investors, financial analysts, and stock exchanges 4

Governments u u u Involvement can be comprehensive u i. e. France and Germany Authority can be delegated to private professional bodies u i. e. Anglo-American Influenced by: u Planning and regulation u Extent of subsidiary operations u MNE trade and development u Availablity of information to the public 5

United Nations u u u u Commission on Transnational Activities (1976) Identified a lack of financial and nonfinancial information International Standards of Accounting and Reporting (1983) Conclusions on Accounting and Reporting by Transnational Corporations (1988, revised 1994) Objectives and Concepts Underlying Financial Statements (1989) Little direct influence, but helpful endorsement of desirable international standards Recent involvement in accounting education and development (especially in Russia and Africa). 6

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development OECD: u u u Limited member countries, mostly Western group of nations Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises (1976, revised 1979) Encourage positive contribution of MNE’s Concerned with information disclosure by MNE as a group Asses the diversity of practice and potential of harmonization 7

European Union Fifteen Nations: u u u Treaty of Rome (1957) Involved in international harmonization since 1960’s European economic integration Remove competitive disadvantages between member countries Issue Directives 8

Fourth Directive u u u Approved in 1978 Information disclosure, Classification and presentation of information Methods of valuation Harmonize existing legal requirements Treatment of: u Historical cost accounting u Inventory Valuation and Depreciation u Goodwill u Current replacement cost u Revaluations to market value u Price level adjustments 9

Seventh Directive u u u Approved in 1983 Consolidated Accounts Defined “group” (U. K. vs. German) Measurement of Performance and Financial Position Harmonize existing legal requirements Treatment of: u Historical cost accounting u Inventory Valuation and Depreciation u Goodwill u Current replacement cost u Revaluations to market value u Price level adjustments 10

Trade Unions and Employees Trade Union u u Number of different, related organizations; Include: u ITUC u ETUC u ICFTU u WCL Issued their own accounting/ disclosure requirements (1977); and Goal is public accountability of MNE’s, not interfirm comparisons. 11

Investors u u u “Outsiders” to the MNE (investors and financial analysts); Represented by international financial organizations, including IOSCO and ICCFAA; Primary concern is lack of interfirm comparability; Support trend toward harmonization; Geographical segmentation, including LOB, is relevant to risk and return analysis of MNE’s; and Harmonization is necessary to determining the validity and effect of MNE measurement practices and international comparisons. 12

Bankers and Lenders u u Interested in corporate financial position, performance, and future prospects; Conservative influence in countries where bankers and lender are more significant than shareholders (France, Germany, Japan); As creditors, better access to non-public corporate information; Include: u Asian Development Bank u European Investment Bank u European Bank for Reconstruction and Development u World Bank u International Finance Corporation 13

Accountants and Auditors u u Preparers and users of information; Auditors and verifiers for third parties; Active in developing harmonization; Include: u International Accounting Standards Board* u International Federation of Accountants 14 *Formerly, International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC)

International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) u u u Established in 1973, now includes the professional organizations of 104 member countries; Responsible for the Development of international accounting standards; Founding members retained significant influence, including: u Australia u Canada u Germany u Japan u Mexico u The Netherlands u United Kingdom u United States 15

International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) Objective: u “(a) to formulate and publish in the public interest accounting standards to be observed in the presentation of financial statements and to promote their worldwide acceptance and observance, and (b) to work generally for the improvement and harmonization of regulations, accounting standards, and procedures relating to the presentation of financial statements. ” u Goal is to achieve comparability for investors while reducing the costs to MNE’s of preparing multiple sets of information. 16

International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) Recently: u IASB endorsed by International Organization of Securities Commissions (1988); u European Union will require all EU listed companies to prepare consolidated returns based on International Accounting Standards by 2005, u SEC reviewing endorsement of IAS for cross-border listings; and u Gap between IAS and GAAP is narrowing. 17

International Harmonization and Disclosure Debate Final Issues: u Whether accounting harmonization will reduce competitive balance between MNE’s and host-country domestic corporations or help host governments; u Whether regional trends, such as in the European Union, will be able to move to the international level; and u Whether adequate reporting systems exist to match the growing complexity of MNE operations. 18