28 03 2017 Fictional interaction Merel Semeijn Faculty
- Slides: 15
28 -03 -2017 | Fictional interaction Merel Semeijn Faculty of philosophy University of Groningen 1 1
28 -03 -2017 | (Frith, 2001) 2 Puzzle 4 2
28 -03 -2017 | Plan of the talk › Two theoretical elements 1. Matravers 2. Embodied Cognition theory › MEC-account › Comparison 1. Leslie 2. Perner 3. Harris 3
28 -03 -2017 | Matravers › Imagination – fiction Cognitive processes involved in engagement with narratives are neutral regarding fictionality Two theoretical elements – MEC-account – Comparison 4
28 -03 -2017 | Embodied Cognition theory › Social embodied cognition › Narrative competence: folk psychological narratives Social embodied cognition and narrative competence lie on a developmental continuum Two theoretical elements – MEC-account – Comparison 5
28 -03 -2017 | MEC-account › M: Narrative competence is neutral regarding fictionality › EC: Social embodied cognition narrative competence › MEC: Social embodied cognition is neutral regarding fictionality Two theoretical elements – MEC-account – Comparison 6
28 -03 -2017 | MEC-account › Pretend play is a type of interaction › Presupposition not to believe › Representational element › Pretend play = Representational fictional interaction Two theoretical elements – MEC-account – Comparison 7
28 -03 -2017 | MEC and the puzzle of pretend play Pretend play Social embodied cognition False belief test Narrative competence Two theoretical elements – MEC-account – Comparison 8
28 -03 -2017 | Leslie Pretend play Metarepresentation False belief test Metarepresentation Two theoretical elements – MEC-account – Comparison 9
28 -03 -2017 | 10 Leslie MEC-account Pretend play Metarepresentation Social embodied cognition False belief test Metarepresentation Narrative competence Two theoretical elements – MEC-account – Comparison
28 -03 -2017 | 11 Perner Pretend play Secondary representation False belief test Metarepresentation Two theoretical elements – MEC-account – Comparison
28 -03 -2017 | 12 Perner MEC-account False belief test Metarepresentation Social embodied cognition Embellished false belief test Metarepresentation Further developed narrative competence Two theoretical elements – MEC-account – Comparison
28 -03 -2017 | 13 Harris Pretend play Simulation (of beliefs) False belief test Simulation (of beliefs and intentions) Two theoretical elements – MEC-account – Comparison
28 -03 -2017 | 14 Harris MEC-account Nonverbal false belief test Simulation (of beliefs and intentions) Social embodied cognition False belief test Simulation (of beliefs and intentions) Narrative competence Two theoretical elements – MEC-account – Comparison
28 -03 -2017 | 15 Conclusions Pretend play = fictional interaction › Pretend play requires social embodied cognition which is neutral regarding fictionality › Passing false belief tests requires narrative competence which is neutral regarding fictionality Open questions › Empirical testing › de Villiers
Merel semeijn
Merel langelaar
The forrester wavetm real-time interaction management
Fictional character names
Fictional character resposta
Fictional character
Fictional character
Fictional character test
Fictional character
Fictional character
Whats the hook in an essay
Fictional character names
Ano ang short story
Bliss by katherine mansfield characters
Allusion literature example
The tiny frog story
