SWGDRUG Scientific Working Group for the Analysis of

  • Slides: 19
Download presentation
SWGDRUG Scientific Working Group for the Analysis of Seized Drugs

SWGDRUG Scientific Working Group for the Analysis of Seized Drugs

Sponsorship/Funding Previously funded by ONDCP n Since 2006, funded by n n Drug Enforcement

Sponsorship/Funding Previously funded by ONDCP n Since 2006, funded by n n Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Forensic Sciences n AND n National Institute of Standards and Technology

Mission of SWGDRUG The mission of SWGDRUG is to recommend minimum standards for the

Mission of SWGDRUG The mission of SWGDRUG is to recommend minimum standards for the forensic examination of seized drugs and to seek their international acceptance.

SWGDRUG Objectives n n n n Specifying requirements for practitioners’ knowledge, skills and abilities,

SWGDRUG Objectives n n n n Specifying requirements for practitioners’ knowledge, skills and abilities, Promoting professional development, Providing a means of information exchange within the forensic science community, Promoting ethical standards of practitioners, Providing minimum standards for examinations and reporting, Establishing quality assurance requirements, Considering relevant international standards, and Seeking international acceptance of SWGDRUG recommendations

Membership n n Members must be experienced and have knowledge in forensic drug analysis

Membership n n Members must be experienced and have knowledge in forensic drug analysis n Maximum of 30 – Chair, Secretariat & members Chair is appointed by DEA Office of Forensic Sciences Deputy Assistant Administrator and must be a DEA employee Members appointed by Chair n Chair endeavors to maintain core committee consisting of representatives from national and international forensic organizations Appointments reside with individual and continues at discretion of Chair (not agency or affiliation appointment) n Appointments 3 years, no limitations of number of

CORE COMMITTEE • DEA – Nelson Santos (Chair) • • Secretariat – Scott Oulton

CORE COMMITTEE • DEA – Nelson Santos (Chair) • • Secretariat – Scott Oulton (non-voting) FBI - Eileen Waninger ASCLD – Garth Glassburg NIST - Susan Ballou ASTM and NEAFS- Jack Mario Educator – Dr. Chris Tindall Educator – Dr. Suzanne Bell

CORE COMMITTEE • CAC & NWAFS - Jerry Massetti • • MAFS - Richard

CORE COMMITTEE • CAC & NWAFS - Jerry Massetti • • MAFS - Richard Paulas MAAFS - Linda Jackson SAFS – Christian Matchett Toxicology – Dr. Robert Powers

CORE COMMITTEE • Canada - Richard Laing • • • Japan – Mr. Osamu

CORE COMMITTEE • Canada - Richard Laing • • • Japan – Mr. Osamu Ohtsuru United Kingdom - Dr. Sylvia Burns Australia - Catherine Quinn Germany - Dr. Udo Zerell ENFSI - Dr. Michael Bovens UNODC - Dr. Iphigenia Naidis

Meetings Meet at least once per year, but generally meet twice depending upon available

Meetings Meet at least once per year, but generally meet twice depending upon available funding n SWGDRUG Members receive no compensation in lieu of salary or wages for their time spent attending meetings or working on business n Minutes are prepared and posted on the website following an appropriate comment period n

SWGDRUG Process The SWGDRUG process is an international forensic science community endeavor n Chair

SWGDRUG Process The SWGDRUG process is an international forensic science community endeavor n Chair establishes subcommittees and designates Subcommittee Chairs to work on projects n Core committee reviews draft recommendations provided by subcommittees n

SWGDRUG Process n n After review, core committee conducts formal vote n Acceptance vote

SWGDRUG Process n n After review, core committee conducts formal vote n Acceptance vote releases the draft recommendation for public comment for minimum of 60 days n Non-acceptance returns draft to subcommittee for further consideration Voting - 3/4 s of the full core committee must be present. 2/3 s of those present must vote in the affirmative (YES) for a proposal to proceed

Subcommittee Process n n n Public comments received from draft recommendation are acknowledged and

Subcommittee Process n n n Public comments received from draft recommendation are acknowledged and forwarded to subcommittee for review and consideration Each comment is addressed and outcome provided to the core committee for consensus After public comment and necessary revision(s), recommendation back to Core membership formal vote n n Acceptance released recommendation for publication Non-acceptance returns draft to subcommitte for

Recommendations – 4 Parts Part I – A Code of Professional Practice for Drug

Recommendations – 4 Parts Part I – A Code of Professional Practice for Drug Analysts n Part II – Education and Training n Part III – Methods of Analysis n Sampling seized drug for qualitative analysis n Drug identification n n Part IV – Quality Assurance General practices n Validation of analytical methods n Uncertainty n

Supplementary Documents n Adopted by the Core Committee in August 2005 n The supplementary

Supplementary Documents n Adopted by the Core Committee in August 2005 n The supplementary documents are not SWGDRUG recommendations n Supplementary documents are intended to be a resource for those responsible for implementing SWGDRUG recommendations n These documents are not inclusive and SWGDRUG recognizes that there are many ways of implementing the recommendations n These are living documents and as such, SWGDRUG invites comments. Send your comments to swgdrug@hotmail. com

Approved Supplemental Documents n n Supplemental Document SD-1 – For Part I “A Code

Approved Supplemental Documents n n Supplemental Document SD-1 – For Part I “A Code of Professional Practice for Drug Analysts” Supplemental Document SD-2 – For Part IVB “Quality Assurance/Validation of Analytical Methods”

Current Projects n Four Active Subcommittees n 1) Uncertainty Subcommittee n Develop Supplemental Documents

Current Projects n Four Active Subcommittees n 1) Uncertainty Subcommittee n Develop Supplemental Documents n 2) Education and Training Subcommittee n Devise Comprehensive Training Program n 3) Editorial/Communications Subcommittee n Revise/Edit Current SWGDRUG Recommendations n 4) Coordination with CLIC n Developing standards for the ID of inorganics

Glossary n n n The accepted revised Glossary of terms was adopted by the

Glossary n n n The accepted revised Glossary of terms was adopted by the Core Committee in August 2005 The Glossary was revised to substitute with ISO terms and definitions where feasible to promote international acceptance First sought glossaries published by recognized standardizing organizations like ISO, ASTM, IUPAC, UNDCP, and those, where possible, that are primary sources.

ASTM All recommendations have been adopted/approved by ASTM with the exception of the uncertainty

ASTM All recommendations have been adopted/approved by ASTM with the exception of the uncertainty recommendation n The uncertainty recommendation is currently up for approval n

Visit us at: www. swgdrug. org

Visit us at: www. swgdrug. org