Simulating Anderson localization via a quantum walk on

  • Slides: 15
Download presentation
Simulating Anderson localization via a quantum walk on a one-dimensional lattice of superconducting qubits

Simulating Anderson localization via a quantum walk on a one-dimensional lattice of superconducting qubits $ $ Joydip Ghosh

Discrete Time Quantum Walk (DTQW) -3 -2 -1 0 + 1 2 3 •

Discrete Time Quantum Walk (DTQW) -3 -2 -1 0 + 1 2 3 • What is the probability that the particle is on location d after N steps ? – No closed form solution Omar et al. , PRA (2006) 11/22/2020 CAP Congress, Edmonton, 2015 Travaglione et al. , PRA (2002) 2

DTQW on a circle • Transfer-matrix representatio • Hadamard v The action of transfer-matrix

DTQW on a circle • Transfer-matrix representatio • Hadamard v The action of transfer-matrix TN on the jth timestep: • Conditional Shift • Aharonov et al. (2001) • Bednarska et al. (2003) 11/22/2020 CAP Congress, Edmonton, 2015 3

Anderson localization – Tight-binding model • Tight-binding Hamiltonian (on a 1 D lattice): •

Anderson localization – Tight-binding model • Tight-binding Hamiltonian (on a 1 D lattice): • Nearest-neighbor interaction: • Eigenstates: 11/22/2020 CAP Congress, Edmonton, 2015 4

Anderson localization – Measures of localization • Exponential decay: – Localization length: • Participation

Anderson localization – Measures of localization • Exponential decay: – Localization length: • Participation ratio: • nth order moment: (we consider 1 st moment, i. e. , n=1) 11/22/2020 CAP Congress, Edmonton, 2015 5

DTQW and Anderson localization • Implementation: 11/22/2020 CAP Congress, Edmonton, 2015 6

DTQW and Anderson localization • Implementation: 11/22/2020 CAP Congress, Edmonton, 2015 6

Superconducting qubits: Promises UCSB • Scalability: UCSB • Tunability: • Long Coherence: T 1

Superconducting qubits: Promises UCSB • Scalability: UCSB • Tunability: • Long Coherence: T 1 ~ 60 μs. 11/22/2020 CAP Congress, Edmonton, 2015 7

Superconducting qubits: Challenges • In-situ qubits: Can’t hop between adjacent lattice sites • Quasiparticles

Superconducting qubits: Challenges • In-situ qubits: Can’t hop between adjacent lattice sites • Quasiparticles are spinless. 11/22/2020 CAP Congress, Edmonton, 2015 8

Simulating DTQW with SC qubits x. Hadamard 11/22/2020 CAP Congress, Edmonton, 2015 9

Simulating DTQW with SC qubits x. Hadamard 11/22/2020 CAP Congress, Edmonton, 2015 9

Simulating DTQW: Results 11/22/2020 CAP Congress, Edmonton, 2015 10

Simulating DTQW: Results 11/22/2020 CAP Congress, Edmonton, 2015 10

Simulating DTQW with disorder: Results 11/22/2020 Z Z Z Z Z Z CAP Congress,

Simulating DTQW with disorder: Results 11/22/2020 Z Z Z Z Z Z CAP Congress, Edmonton, 2015 11

Simulating DTQW with disorder: Results • The Z-rotation angles are chosen randomly from the

Simulating DTQW with disorder: Results • The Z-rotation angles are chosen randomly from the interval [−Wπ, Wπ], where W denotes the strength of disorder (0 < W < 1). • Bimodal distribution observed if the particle is prepared to be in superposition of two lattice sites. 11/22/2020 CAP Congress, Edmonton, 2015 12

Designing gates • Coupled-qubit Hamiltonian: • Hamiltonian in single-excitation subspace (with Ω 1 =Ω

Designing gates • Coupled-qubit Hamiltonian: • Hamiltonian in single-excitation subspace (with Ω 1 =Ω 2 =0 ) • SWAP condition: • x. Hadamard = Ry(-π/2) • Condition: 11/22/2020 CAP Congress, Edmonton, 2015 13

8 -qubit case: A near-term (? ) experiment • Minimal requirement: 11/22/2020 CAP Congress,

8 -qubit case: A near-term (? ) experiment • Minimal requirement: 11/22/2020 CAP Congress, Edmonton, 2015 14

Summary and future directions • A gate-based scheme to simulate DTQW. • Disorders can

Summary and future directions • A gate-based scheme to simulate DTQW. • Disorders can be introduced and controlled. • Anderson localization observed with SC qubits. • Extension to multi-particle quantum walk. • Study interactions. • Time-dependent disorders. Thank You !!! 11/22/2020 CAP Congress, Edmonton, 2015 15