Research evidence and quality improvement Jennifer Tieman Care

  • Slides: 15
Download presentation
Research, evidence and quality improvement Jennifer Tieman, Care. Search Director Deb Rawlings, Care. Search

Research, evidence and quality improvement Jennifer Tieman, Care. Search Director Deb Rawlings, Care. Search Research Fellow PCNA, April 2014

Overview • • • Why does this matter Differences and synergies Care. Search approaches

Overview • • • Why does this matter Differences and synergies Care. Search approaches and strategies Care. Search evaluation studies Implications

Why this matters “Between the healthcare we have and the care we could have

Why this matters “Between the healthcare we have and the care we could have lies not a gap but a chasm”. Institute of Medicine, Crossing the Quality Chasm, 2001

Comparison of EBP, QI and Research QI EBP Research Definition Evaluate effectiveness of current

Comparison of EBP, QI and Research QI EBP Research Definition Evaluate effectiveness of current process and improve care processes locally Integration of research evidence into clinical decision Formal, systematic inquiry to generate knowledge Purposes Bring about improvement in this setting Compare to standards or benchmarks Translate research into practice Increase effectiveness of treatment Answer a research question Generate new knowledge Methods PDSA PICO/PICOT Scientific methods Adapted from North Dakota Centre for Nursing Comparison of Evidence based Practice, Quality Improvement and Nursing Research, December 2013

Independent or complementary? Clinical decisions Process and system change Do things right (QI) Good

Independent or complementary? Clinical decisions Process and system change Do things right (QI) Good patient care Do right things right (EBP & QI) Do right things (EBP) Adapted from Glasziou, Ogrinc & Goodman 2011 Can evidence based medicine and clinical quality improvement learn from each other? BMJ Qual Saf 20: 113 -117

Nurses’ roles • Nursing practice – Expectations as to knowledge and competency in QI,

Nurses’ roles • Nursing practice – Expectations as to knowledge and competency in QI, EBP and research • Specific roles – QI activities (eg NSAP, PCOC) – Research studies (eg Pa. CCSC) – EBP (eg journal clubs)

Care. Search Strategies • Making evidence accessible – Pub. Med Searches – Clinical Evidence

Care. Search Strategies • Making evidence accessible – Pub. Med Searches – Clinical Evidence • Encouraging evidence use – Nurses Hub (and Nurses Hub News) – My Learning • Partnerships in QI – WTCF – Information on QI • Supporting research – RDMS – Research Resources

Evaluation Studies • • RDMS Nurses Hub Search Filters WTCF

Evaluation Studies • • RDMS Nurses Hub Search Filters WTCF

Nurses Hub • Nurses Hub – Evidence and resources contextualised for, and specific to,

Nurses Hub • Nurses Hub – Evidence and resources contextualised for, and specific to, nurses – All settings of care • Study Methodology – Online survey (n=233) – Stakeholder interviews (n=10) • Key Findings – ¾ of respondents had used information found on Hub – 30% said information had assisted them in making changes in their practice – Issues reported relating to access to technology and time for EBP and literature

RDMS • RDMS – Online data collection system – Facilitates multisite research • Study

RDMS • RDMS – Online data collection system – Facilitates multisite research • Study Methodology – User survey (n=44) – Stakeholder interviews (n=10) • Key Findings – Cost savings provided by a common resource – Research value of ability to have multiple site data entry – Helps to focus and professionalise research

Search Filters • Pub. Med Topic Searches – Brokered access to literature – Facilitate

Search Filters • Pub. Med Topic Searches – Brokered access to literature – Facilitate evidence use • Study Methodology – Online survey (n=82) • Key Findings – 1/3 look for information daily – 95% indicated that Pub. Med searches found information they hadn’t seen – Less than 1/3 felt their own personal search would have found the same information

WTCF • Partnership – NSAP, PCOC, Care. Search – WTCF (Structured approach to quality

WTCF • Partnership – NSAP, PCOC, Care. Search – WTCF (Structured approach to quality improvement activity that incorporates evidence) • Study Methodology – Workshop evaluation (n=81) • Key Findings – 86% felt the content was relevant to needs in QI – 70% of workshop participants felt more confident in implementing change

So What? • Nurses face increasing demands in practice and expectations around knowledge and

So What? • Nurses face increasing demands in practice and expectations around knowledge and skills in EBP, research and QI • Care. Search has developed evidence based resources and supports for those providing direct clinical care • Care. Search is working to support the processes and activities that underpin research, QI and EBP • Care. Search runs an evaluation program to assess whether these strategies and approaches are effective

Care. Search would like to thank the many people who contribute their time and

Care. Search would like to thank the many people who contribute their time and expertise to the project, including members of the National Advisory Group and the Knowledge Network Management Group. Care. Search is funded by the Australian Government Department of Health. www. caresearch. com. au