Reactive ATP and MINERVA Atrial Reactive ATP Overview

  • Slides: 19
Download presentation
Reactive ATP and MINERVA

Reactive ATP and MINERVA

Atrial Reactive ATP Overview Reactive ATP allows for multiple deliveries of programmed ATP therapies

Atrial Reactive ATP Overview Reactive ATP allows for multiple deliveries of programmed ATP therapies in response to two clinically relevant events: • Change in the arrhythmia rhythm (cycle length or regularity) • Elapsed period of time

Atrial Reactive ATP Programming Rhythm Change options: On/Off Time Interval options: Off, 2 hrs…

Atrial Reactive ATP Programming Rhythm Change options: On/Off Time Interval options: Off, 2 hrs… 48 hrs

Reactive ATP – Rhythm Change If Rhythm Change is enabled: • ATP Therapy “bins”

Reactive ATP – Rhythm Change If Rhythm Change is enabled: • ATP Therapy “bins” are automatically created by the device based upon whether 1 or 2 zones for AT/AF detection are programmed • The full set of programmed ATP therapies (Rx 1, Rx 2, Rx 3) is available for each bin and for each zone Regular Irregular

Treated AT/AF Programmer View

Treated AT/AF Programmer View

Evolution of Reactive ATP

Evolution of Reactive ATP

Example of Changing Atrial Arrhythmias

Example of Changing Atrial Arrhythmias

Reactive ATP Example

Reactive ATP Example

Another Reactive ATP Example

Another Reactive ATP Example

MINERVA Study n=385 n=383 n=398

MINERVA Study n=385 n=383 n=398

MINERVA • MINimiz. E Right Ventricular pacing to prevent Atrial fibrillation and heart failure

MINERVA • MINimiz. E Right Ventricular pacing to prevent Atrial fibrillation and heart failure study • Primary objective is to compare the Control DDDR to DDDRP+MVP arms at 2 years using the composite clinical endpoints of – All Cause Death – CV Hospitalizations – Permanent AF

61% relative reduction between DDDRP + MVP arm and Control DDDR (p = 0.

61% relative reduction between DDDRP + MVP arm and Control DDDR (p = 0. 003)

Risk of AF >7 Days and a. ATP Efficacy Implies that a. ATP is

Risk of AF >7 Days and a. ATP Efficacy Implies that a. ATP is a driving force behind the results

MINERVA Key Results • Primary End Point – 2 year composite of death, CV

MINERVA Key Results • Primary End Point – 2 year composite of death, CV hospitalizations, and permanent AF in DDDRP + MVP arm vs. Control DDDR (26% relative risk reduction, p = 0. 04) • End point driven by slowing progression of AF – 61% relative reduction between DDDRP + MVP arm and Control DDDR (p = 0. 004) • Rates for HCU to AF (hospitalizations, ER visits, atrial CVs) lower in DDDRP + MVP arm compared to Control DDDR

Longevity • Pacing thresholds rise as the coupling interval is reduced • High outputs

Longevity • Pacing thresholds rise as the coupling interval is reduced • High outputs designed to maximize the ability to capture all coupling intervals during ATP • 1000 a. ATP per month decreases longevity by less than 3%