PreClinical Safety Studies with the LUTONIX 035 Renu

  • Slides: 20
Download presentation
Pre-Clinical Safety Studies with the LUTONIX® 035 Renu Virmani MD CVPath Institute, Gaithersburg, Maryland

Pre-Clinical Safety Studies with the LUTONIX® 035 Renu Virmani MD CVPath Institute, Gaithersburg, Maryland www. cvpath. org

Speaker's name: Renu Virmani, MD I have the following potential conflicts of interest to

Speaker's name: Renu Virmani, MD I have the following potential conflicts of interest to report: Ø Consultant: 480 Biomedical, Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, and W. L. Gore. Ø Employment in industry: No Ø Honorarium: 480 Biomedical, Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Cordis J&J, Lutonix, Medtronic, Merck, Terumo Corporation, and W. L. Gore. Ø Institutional grant/research support: 480 Biomedical, Abbott Vascular, Atrium, Bio. Sensors International, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cordis J&J, GSK, Kona, Medtronic, Micro. Port Medical, Celo. Nova, Orbus. Neich Medical, Re. Core, SINO Medical Technology, Terumo Corporation, and W. L. Gore. Ø Owner of a healthcare company: No Ø Stockholder of a healthcare company: No

Drug coated balloon devices (Peripheral artery) Device Company Coating Drug dose (µg/mm 2) CE

Drug coated balloon devices (Peripheral artery) Device Company Coating Drug dose (µg/mm 2) CE mark* Advance 18 PTX™ Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA Paclitaxel 3. 0 Yes Cotavance® Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany Paclitaxel–iopromide 3. 0 Yes Freeway™ Eurocor, Bonn, Germany Paclitaxel–shellac 3. 0 Yes IN. PACT™ Admiral, Amphirion, Pacific Medtronic Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA Paclitaxel–urea 3. 0 Yes Lutonix DCB ® (Moxy) BARD, Murray Hill, NJ, USA Paclitaxel–polysorbate/sorbitol 2. 0 Yes Legflow® Cardionovum, Warsaw, Poland Paclitaxel–shellac 3. 0 Yes Passeo-18 Lux® Biotronik, Bülach, Switzerland Paclitaxel–butyryl-tri-hexyl citrate 3. 0 No → Yes Stellarex® Spectranetics, Colorado Springs, CO, USA Paclitaxel, excipient not disclosed 2. 0 No → Yes * Lutonix DCB® and IN. PACT™ are currently approved by the FDA for clinical use in USA. Byrne RA, Joner M. et al. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014; 11: 13 -23 In. Pact ELUTAX Sequent Please Sur. Modics Pantera Lux Moxy

HOW IS DCB DIFFERENT FROM DES Parameters that distinguish DCB from DES DCB Drug

HOW IS DCB DIFFERENT FROM DES Parameters that distinguish DCB from DES DCB Drug concentration on the device Low 5‐ 10 μg/mm Very High 2‐ 3 μg/mm 2 (≒ 20‐ 30 μg/mm) Drug transfer at the time of deployment Slow Rapid, all at once Polymer No (excipient important) Short term Need a drug which binds to cell membranes and is easily transferable to adjacent cells Diffusion Good Excellent Lipophilic yes Even better Not necessary Should be active immediately Reservoir of drug Drug retention in tissues Active ingridient Zilver PTX DES DCB

Requirements For DCB • Must deliver large quantities of the drug within seconds •

Requirements For DCB • Must deliver large quantities of the drug within seconds • Must distribute within the media in the first few days • Therapeutic drug levels must be maintained for at least several weeks • Must allow rapid healing as compared to DES • No need for long‐term anticoagulation • Light microscopy must show biologic effects at 28‐days at least

LUTONIX® DCB Catheter Technology Uniform Durable • Coating applied while balloon is inflated •

LUTONIX® DCB Catheter Technology Uniform Durable • Coating applied while balloon is inflated • <0. 1% drug loss after dry inflate test* • Coating variability: ± 1. 3 micron • < 4% segment-to-segment variability in balloon drug load Data on file at Lutonix CAUTION: Investigational Device – Limited by Federal (USA) Law to Investigational Use • <0. 1% drug loss after sheath insertion *Methods of Kelsch et al. , Invest Radiol 2011; 46(4): 255 -63

Ex Vivo Administration of Fluorescent. Labeled PTX to Excised Porcine Artery 10% Oregon green

Ex Vivo Administration of Fluorescent. Labeled PTX to Excised Porcine Artery 10% Oregon green labeled paclitaxel incorporated into Lutonix DCB coating CAUTION: Investigational Device – Limited by Federal (USA) Law to Investigational Use

LUTONIX® 035 vs. In. Pact. TM Difference LUTONIX® 035 In. Pact™ PACLITAXEL DOSE 2

LUTONIX® 035 vs. In. Pact. TM Difference LUTONIX® 035 In. Pact™ PACLITAXEL DOSE 2 CARRIER Polysorbate & Sorbitol Urea SYSTEMIC DOWNSTREAM EFFECTS None to Minimal Present SFA= 1 st with FDA Approval Recent SFA FDA Approval/ BTK Product Recall 2014 SFA/BTK PRODUCT LINE μg/mm 2 3. 5 μg/mm 2 LUTONIX® 035 Distal Tip Middle In. Pact™ Distal Tip Middle

Coating Integrity is Variable PACLITAXEL LUTONIX® 035 PACLITAXEL IN COATING AFTER AQUEOUS EXPOSURE In.

Coating Integrity is Variable PACLITAXEL LUTONIX® 035 PACLITAXEL IN COATING AFTER AQUEOUS EXPOSURE In. Pact™

PTX Adherence to Balloon: iopromide versus urea coating Split-off during dry inflation Loss during

PTX Adherence to Balloon: iopromide versus urea coating Split-off during dry inflation Loss during passage** Remnant on balloon after deflation *** * p=0. 002 ** through a blood‐filled hemostatic valve and guiding catheter and 1 min in stirred blood *** not released during expansion in a coronary artery Kelsch et al. Invest Radiol. 2011; 46: 255 -263

Paclitaxel Uptake in the Arterial Wall • LUTONIX® 035 (2 mg/mm 2)offers similar paclitaxel

Paclitaxel Uptake in the Arterial Wall • LUTONIX® 035 (2 mg/mm 2)offers similar paclitaxel arterial tissue concentration levels at 24 hours as In. Pact. TM (3. 5 mg/mm 2) • Greater concentration levels at 60 days in LUTONIX® 035 with less paclitaxel dose as compared to In. Pact. TM LUTONIX® 035 Rapid Uptake with Sustained Therapeutic Dose of Paclitaxel Arterial Tissue Concentration LUTONIX® 035 Preclinical Animal Study In. Pact. TM Animal Study

Histologic Parameters for Evaluation of DCB Safety/Efficacy Fibrin • Key parameters include: – Endothelial

Histologic Parameters for Evaluation of DCB Safety/Efficacy Fibrin • Key parameters include: – Endothelial Loss – Fibrin/Platelets – Inflammation – Injury – Medial Smooth Muscle Cell Loss – Matrix Replacement: • Proteoglycan • Collagen – Medial and Adventitial Fibrosis SMC loss Proteoglycan Fibrosis

Vascular changes following Lutonix DCB treatment in Porcine Iliac arteries 1 x dose 28

Vascular changes following Lutonix DCB treatment in Porcine Iliac arteries 1 x dose 28 -days 90 -days 180 -days Yazdani SK, et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014; 83(1): 132 -40

Vascular, downstream, and pharmacokinetic responses to treatment with a low dose drug‐coated balloon in

Vascular, downstream, and pharmacokinetic responses to treatment with a low dose drug‐coated balloon in a swine femoral artery model Yazdani SK, et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014; 83(1): 132 -40

Vascular Changes in Downstream Skeletal Muscle (None of physiological significance observed for Moxy DCB

Vascular Changes in Downstream Skeletal Muscle (None of physiological significance observed for Moxy DCB at any time) 1 x Dose 28 Days 90 Days (None observed for 1 x dose at 180 days) 28 Days 4 x Dose 90 Days 180 Days

Rare Changes in Downstream Porcine Skeletal Muscle: None of Physiological Significance LUTONIX ® DCB

Rare Changes in Downstream Porcine Skeletal Muscle: None of Physiological Significance LUTONIX ® DCB Catheter Final Formulation (1 x dose) (4 x dose) 0. 0057 0. 0024 0. 0015

Histologic findings of emboli/vascular changes by coronary band skeletal muscle territories in swine peripheral

Histologic findings of emboli/vascular changes by coronary band skeletal muscle territories in swine peripheral artery following Lutonix drug coated balloon X 3 (2µg/mm 2 paclitaxel) dilatation at 90 -days inflammatory cells Loss of medial SMCs with replacement by proteoglycan/collagen No. of sections (Downstream muscle/coronary band) Vascular Changes Skeletal Muscle Necrosis/Fibrosis Crystalline material 1 14 (12 / 2) 1 0 0 2 14 (12 / 2) 0 0 0 3 14 (12 / 2) 4 0 0 4 14 (12 / 2) 0 0 0 Total 56 5 0 0 5 /56 (8. 9 %) from DCB treatment showed findings of vascular change associated with paclitaxel and/or excipient (drug carrier). Skeletal Muscle: Gastrocnemius Muscle, Gluteus Maximus Muscle, Gracilis Muscle, Rectus Femoris Muscle, Semimembranosus Muscle, and Semitendinosus Muscle

Histologic findings of emboli/vascular changes by coronary band skeletal muscle territories in swine peripheral

Histologic findings of emboli/vascular changes by coronary band skeletal muscle territories in swine peripheral artery following IN. PACT ADMIRAL DCB x 3 (3µg/mm 2 paclitaxel) dilatation at 90 -days crystalline material No. of sections (Downstream muscle/coronary band) Vascular Changes Skeletal Muscle Necrosis/Fibrosis Crystalline material 1 13 (12 / 1) 6 0 0 2 13 (12 / 1) 5 1 0 3 13 (12 / 1) 7 2 1 4 13 (12 / 1) 8 2 1 5 13 (12 / 1) 8 3 1 6 13 (12 / 1) 4 1 1 Total 78 38 9 4 Fibrinoid Necrosis coronary band skeletal muscle 38 /78 (48. 7 %) from DCB treatment showed findings of vascular change associated with paclitaxel and/or excipient (drug carrier). Skeletal Muscle: Gastrocnemius Muscle, Gluteus Maximus Muscle, Gracilis Muscle, Rectus Femoris Muscle, Semimembranosus Muscle, and Semitendinosus Muscle

Safety Profile All about Balancing Safety, Efficacy and Biologic Response Not all balloons are

Safety Profile All about Balancing Safety, Efficacy and Biologic Response Not all balloons are created equal More less Efficacy Less Rapid Vascular Healing Good Re-Endothelialization No distal Emboli Drug Load Use of Carrier/Excipient Drug Retention Repeat Inflations Safety Less neointima Absence of restenosis No, early or late thrombosis more

Acknowledgments CVPath Institute Kazuyuki Yahagi, MD Oscar D. Sanchez, MD Tobias R. Koppara, MD

Acknowledgments CVPath Institute Kazuyuki Yahagi, MD Oscar D. Sanchez, MD Tobias R. Koppara, MD Erica Pacheco, MS Robert Kutz, MS Russ Jones Ed Acampado, DVM Youhui Liang, MD Abebe Atiso, HT Jinky Beyer Hedwig Avallone, HT Lila Adams, HT Hengying Ouyang, MD Elena Ladich, MD Frank D Kolodgie, Ph. D Michael Joner, MD Washington DC