Phenotypic Structure of Grain Size and Shape Variation

  • Slides: 22
Download presentation
Phenotypic Structure of Grain Size and Shape Variation in M 5 mutant lines of

Phenotypic Structure of Grain Size and Shape Variation in M 5 mutant lines of spring wheat Kenzhebayeva Saule, Kazakh National University named after al-Farabi, Almaty, Kazakhstan

Cereal crops of importance in the Kazakhstan • Kazakhstan is one of the major

Cereal crops of importance in the Kazakhstan • Kazakhstan is one of the major wheat producers and exporters in Central Asia. • Wheat area is about 13 million ha. • The bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L. ) accounts 91% and durum wheat is 9% of total area. Spring wheat occupies 95 percent of the total wheat area in Kazakhstan. • Kazakhstan producted 13, 5 -20, 1 million tons of grain. Average grain yield is (9 centner/ha), it is not stable. • Nine major wheat agroecological zones have been recognized in Kazakhstan on the basis of different wheat types, growing season, hydrothermic and soil conditions.

Kazakhstan Wheat Regions

Kazakhstan Wheat Regions

Introduction • Availability of genetic variability is the prerequisite for any breeding program. •

Introduction • Availability of genetic variability is the prerequisite for any breeding program. • Besides conventional methods, induced mutation has been extensively used for creating new genetic variation in crop plants. • To date, 264 mutant cultivars of bred wheat have been released (FAO/IAEA, 2012). Mutation induction with radiation was the most commonly used method to develop direct mutant cultivars. • Mutation breeding is one of an important tool in crop improvement with increased agronomic values.

 • Grain size and shape are two of the main targets for wheat

• Grain size and shape are two of the main targets for wheat breeding. • They affects many milling characteristics and end-use qualities in wheat. Wheat seed size also influences the seedling vigour and establishment in field. • Grain size is characterized by grain size variables (i. e. , TGW, area, width and factor form density (FFD). • Grain shape means a relative proportion of the grain main growth axes. • Grain shape is generally estimated by the grain shape • variables (i. e. , ratio of L/W and length), vertical perimeter, sphericity and horizontal axes proportion.

Material and methods Ø Based on radiation sensitivity studies, dose of 100 and 200

Material and methods Ø Based on radiation sensitivity studies, dose of 100 and 200 Gy was chosen to irradiate of cv. Zhenis of spring wheat to obtain M 3 mutant lines. Initially, irradiation of dried seeds was performed in an ionizing device (PXM -γ 20, 60 Co gamma rays) at the Kazakh Nuclear Center. The plants were grown in field experimental plots. Ø The selection of individual high-yielding potential mutant lines was done every generation from M 3 taking into account the following yield parameters: • Grain weight per plant, • greater number of grain per main spike, • greater weight of grains per main spike compared to the parental variety. • The best genotypes were chosen according to their elements of yield.

Material and methods • M 5 seeds of the selected M 3 lines were

Material and methods • M 5 seeds of the selected M 3 lines were used in this study to assess grain morphometric variations in mutant germplasm developed through gamma radiation by 100 and 200 Gy doses.

Grain morphometric analysis • Morphometric measurements were performed on 50 to 60 grains/line using

Grain morphometric analysis • Morphometric measurements were performed on 50 to 60 grains/line using Image system for grain analysis (the analyzer regent Instrument 2007, USA). • Grain area (GA), Grain length (GL), TGW and grain width (GW), were measured. The ratio of average GL/GW was calculated. • Factor form density (FFD) describes the differences in grain density and the deviation of a shape from a cylindrical form and is given by: grain weight/(grain length*grain width) (Giura and Saulescu, 1996).

Phenotypic variations in thousand grain weight, g, in M 5 mutant lines of spring

Phenotypic variations in thousand grain weight, g, in M 5 mutant lines of spring wheat developed using 100 and 200 Gy doses and background cv. Zhenis TGW 38. 93 g to 51. 69 g in 100 Gy germplasm, with a mean value of 41, 54 g (SD ± 1. 77, n=15). 2 lines (№ 5(4) and № 24(2) differed significantly from cv. Zhenis being characterized by higher values than the parental variety (1. 31 and 1. 36 times). TGW showed greater degree of variation compared to 100 Gy germplasm. The mean value ranged from 34. 92 to 74. 65 g with a mean value of 44, 23 g (SD ± 1. 96, n=15). 3 lines (№ 43(4), (№ 49(4) and № 49(6) differed significantly from cv. Zhenis being characterized by higher values than cv. Zhenis (on 1. 96, 1. 25 and 1. 30 times, respectively).

Phenotypic variations in grain area in M 5 mutant lines of spring wheat developed

Phenotypic variations in grain area in M 5 mutant lines of spring wheat developed using 100 and 200 Gy doses and background cv. Zhenis 100 Gy Grain area, mm 25 20 15 ** 4) ** 6( * 5) * 6( ** 13 )* 13 ** (3 )* 18 ** (5 )* 24 ** (1 )* 24 ** (2 )* 25 ** (2 )* 26 ** (6 )* 26 ** (7 )* 26 ** (9 26 )** (1 * 0) * 30 ** (1 )* 36 ** Av (1)* er ** ag e M 5 6( 4) * 5( . Z he n is 10 cv GA in wheat 100 Gy mutant germplasm were from 18. 88 mm to 22. 97 mm (mean=20. 15 mm; SD=1. 88 mm; n=15) the range of 7. 5%31. 9% higher than the mean value of cv. Zhenis. There were highly significant differences between the parental cv. Zhenis and all mutant lines for GA. The GA was the highest in three lines (№ 26(6), № 26(9) and № 36(1) characterizing value greater than 22 mm which was higher by 1. 26 and 1. 32 times than that of cv. Zhenis. 200 Gy 20 15 . Z he 43 nis (1 )* 43 ** (3 )* 43 ** (4 )* 45 ** (1 )* 45 ** (2 )* 45 ** (3 )* 48 ** (3 )* 49 ** (2 )* 49 ** (4 )* 49 ** (6 )* 50 ** (7 )* 51 ** (1 )* 51 ** (2 )* 51 ** (8 )* 53 ** ( M 2)* * 5 av * er ag e 10 cv The mean value of in (GA) in 200 y G mutant germplasm ranged from 20. 83 to 22. 96 mm (mean=22. 14 mm; SD=0. 88 mm; n=15). The highest GA was the in seven M 5 mutant lines (№ 43(4), № 45(1), № 49(6), № 51(1), № 51(2), № 51(8) and № 53(2). Grain area, mm 25

Correlation coefficient between grain area and TGW in M 5 mutant lines of spring

Correlation coefficient between grain area and TGW in M 5 mutant lines of spring wheat developed using 100 and 200 Gy doses and genetic background cv. Zhenis 100 Gy 0. 25 • -0, 54 -0, 98 -0, 96 -0, 12 -0, 85 0, 30 № 24(1) 0, 98 № 26(6) -0, 75 -0, 13 0, 98 № 36(1) 0, 48 0, 16 0, 12 0, 94 cv. Zhenis № 5(4) № 6(5) № 6(13) № 13(3) № 18(5) № 24(1) № 24(2) № 25(2) № 26(6) № 26(7) № 26(9) № 26(10) № 30(1), № 36(1) 200 Gy 0. 25 • № 45(2) -0, 56 -1. 00 -0, 50 -0, 01 0, 98 № 49(6) -0, 52 -0, 43 -0, 93 0, 30 0, 80 № 53(2) 0. 82 -1. 00 -0, 14 -0, 62 0. 79 Zhenis № 43(1) № 43(3) № 43(4) № 45(1) № 45(2) № 45(3) № 48(3) № 49(2) № 49(4) № 49(6) № 50(7) № 51(1) № 51(2) № 51(8) № 53(2)

Phenotypic Variation in Grain Size and Shape in mutant germplasm. 100 Gy 200 Gy

Phenotypic Variation in Grain Size and Shape in mutant germplasm. 100 Gy 200 Gy

Phenotypic variations in GRAIN LENGTH in M 5 mutant lines developed using 100 Gy

Phenotypic variations in GRAIN LENGTH in M 5 mutant lines developed using 100 Gy and 200 Gy doses and genetic background of cv. Zhenis The average of GL which largely describe grain shape ranged from 6. 51 mm to 7. 15 mm (mean = 6. 80 mm, SD=0. 22, n=15). This trait that was higher in the range of 6. 9% -17. 4% than the mean value of cv. Zhenis. GL was the highest in four M 5 mutant lines (№ 26(6), № 26(7), № 26(9) and № 36(1) having value higher by 1. 16 and 1. 17 times than cv. Zhenis. GL ranged from 7. 48 to 8. 22 mm (mean = 7. 83 mm, SD=0. 49, n=15). The GL was the highest in four M 5 mutant lines (№ 51(1), (№ 51(8), № 53(2) and № 51(2) with a value of greater than 8 mm that is higher compared with cv. Zhenis in the range of 22. 8%-35. 0%.

Correlation coefficient between grain length and TGW in M 5 100 Gy germpasm №

Correlation coefficient between grain length and TGW in M 5 100 Gy germpasm № 18(5) 0. 69 -0, 76 -0, 29 -1. 00 0, 56 -0, 07 0, 77 № 24(1) 1. 00 -0, 93 № 25(2) 0, 84 № 26(10) -0, 30 -0. 82 0. 95 0. 54 -1. 00 cv. Zhenis № 5(4) № 6(5) № 6(13) № 13(3) № 18(5) № 24(1) № 24(2) № 25(2) № 26(6) № 26(7) № 26(9) № 26(10) № 30(1) № 36(1) M 5 200 Gy germpasm № 43(1) № 43(3) 0. 69 0, 80 0, 96 0, 62 № 51(8) № 53(2) 0, 07 -0, 97 -0, 46 -0, 43 -0, 24 0, 12 0, 29 -0, 99 -0. 69 -0. 99 0. 75 Zhenis № 43(1) № 43(3) № 43(4) № 45(1) № 45(2) № 45(3) № 48(3) № 49(2) № 49(4) № 49(6) № 50(7) № 51(1) № 51(2) № 51(8) № 53(2) 1. 00

Phenotypic variations in grain width in M 5 mutant lines developed using 100 Gy

Phenotypic variations in grain width in M 5 mutant lines developed using 100 Gy and 200 Gy doses and genetic background of cv. Zhenis 5 100 Gy Grain width, mm 4 3 2 1 he ni s 5( 4) * 6( * 5) ** * 6( 13 ) 13 (3 18 )* (5 )* ** 24 24 (1) (2 )* ** 25 26 (2) (6 )* 26 ** (7 )* 26 ** (9 ) 26 *** (1 0) ** 30 * (1 ) 36 ** (1 Av )* er ** ag e M 5 0 5 200 Gy 4 3 2 1 Zh en 43 is (1 )* ** 43 (3 )* ** 43 (4 )* ** 45 (1 )* ** 45 (2 )* ** 45 (3 )* ** 48 (3 )* ** 49 (2 )* ** 49 (4 )* ** 49 (6 )* ** 50 (7 )* ** 51 (1 )* ** 51 (2 )* ** 51 (8 )* ** 53 (2 )* M * 5 av * er ag e 0 cv. Grain width, mm The range of GW was 3. 64 mm to 3. 91 mm in M 5 germplasm developed using 200 Gy (mean = 3. 75 mm, SD=0. 08, n=15). Four M 5 lines (№ 51(1), № 51(2), (№ 51(8) and № 53(2) showed the highest GW in the range of 21. 4 up to 24. 9%. cv . Z The range of GW was 3. 22 to 3. 88 mm (mean = 3. 60 mm, SD=0. 18, n=15). The GW was the highest in three M 5 lines (№ 24(2), № 26(7) and № 26(9) with means compared with cv. Zhenis that is higher in the range of 21. 7% - 24. 0%.

Correlation coefficient between grain width and TGW in M 5 100 Gy germpasm 1.

Correlation coefficient between grain width and TGW in M 5 100 Gy germpasm 1. 00 0, 78 0, 30 1. 00 0, 66 0, 40 -0, 22 -0, 75 -0, 52 0, 13 0, 03 -0, 80 -0. 08 -0. 93 -0. 95 0. 17 M 5 200 Gy germpasm 1. 00 0, 51 0, 84 -0. 26 -0, 47 0, 51 0, 42 0, 03 -1. 00 0, 93 -0, 26 0. 41 -0. 16 0. 89 -0. 08

Phenotypic variations in ratio of GL and GW in M 5 mutant lines developed

Phenotypic variations in ratio of GL and GW in M 5 mutant lines developed using 100 Gy and 200 Gy doses and genetic background of cv. Zhenis 2, 2 100 Gy 2, 0 1, 8 2, 4 ** )* ** 36 (1 * 30 (1 10 )* * ** )* 26 ( ** 26 (9 )* ** 26 (7 )* ** )* 26 (6 ** )* 25 (2 ** )* 24 (1 ** )* 18 (5 ** )* 13 (3 ** 6( 13 5) * ** 6( 4) * )* 200 Gy 2, 2 2, 0 1, 8 № . Z he 43 nis (1 № )** 43 * (3 № )** 43 * (4 № )** 45 * (1 № )** 45 * (2 № )** 45 * (3 № )** 48 * (3 № )** 49 * (2 № )** 49 * (4 ) № * 49 ** (6 № )** 50 * (7 ) № * 51 ** (1 № )** 51 * (2 ) № * 51 ** (8 № )** 53 * (2 )* ** 1, 6 cv Ratio GL/GW The range of ratio of GL and GW was 2. 03 to 2. 21. The ratio was the highest in three M 5 lines (№ 43(1), № 43(4), № 48(3), № 51(2), and № 51(8). cv. Zhenis 1. 95. 6( 4) * 5( cv . Z ** is 1, 6 he n Ratio of GL/GW The range of ratio of GL and GW was 1. 77 to 2. 02. The ratio was the highest in three M 5 lines (№ 6(13), № 25(2) and № 36(1). cv. Zhenis - 1. 95.

is 43 № (1) 43 № (3) 43 № (4) 45 № (1) 45

is 43 № (1) 43 № (3) 43 № (4) 45 № (1) 45 № (2) 45 № (3) 48 № (3) 49 № (2) 49 № (4) 49 № (6) 50 № (7) 51 № (1) 51 № (2) 51 № (8) 53 (2 ) № en FFD from 0. 0007 to 0. 0017 he ni № s 5( 4 № ) 6( № 5) 6( 1 № 3) 13 ( № 3) 18 ( № 5) 24 ( № 1) 24 ( № 2) 25 ( № 2) 26 ( № 6) 26 ( № 7) 26 № (9) 26 (1 № 0) 30 ( № 1) 36 (1 ) . Z cv Factor form density (FFD) FFD 0. 0011 to 0. 0020 Zh Factor form density (FFD) Phenotypic variations in Factor form density (FFD) in M 5 mutant lines developed using 100 Gy and 200 Gy doses and genetic background of cv. Zhenis 0, 003 100 Gy 0, 002 0, 001 0, 000 0, 003 200 GY 0, 002 0, 001 0

Effect of 100 Gy and 200 Gy on the mean value of grain length,

Effect of 100 Gy and 200 Gy on the mean value of grain length, width, length/width ratio and area in M 5 mutant germpalsm developed on background cv. Zhenis (n=15 for each). 25 20 15 10 5 0 GW, mm cv. Zhenis GL, mm average 100 Gry M 5 lines L/W GA, mm average 200 Gry M 5 lines

Relation between grain length and width, relation between L/W and length Simple linear correlation

Relation between grain length and width, relation between L/W and length Simple linear correlation coefficients (Spearman’s rho) In M 5 100 Gy germpasm Ratio of L/ W 2, 20 R 2 = 0, 0114 2, 00 1, 80 1, 60 5, 89 6, 39 6, 89 Grain length, mm 7, 39 Main/minor axis, (L/W) Grain width, mm In M 5 200 Gy germpasm 9 R 2 = 0, 4638 8 7 6 5 10 15 Grain length, mm 2, 30 20 R 2 = 0, 5594 2, 10 1, 90 1, 70 5 6 7 8 Grain length, mm 9

Conclusions 1. 2. 3. 100 and 200 Gy gamma radiation can induce significant Phenotypic

Conclusions 1. 2. 3. 100 and 200 Gy gamma radiation can induce significant Phenotypic variations in grain size and grain shape. The mutants developed by means of 100 and 200 Gy had significantly higher, particularly GA, GL, and GW than the parental cv. Zhenis. GL and GA are the most phenotypic variable traits and their variations are also significantly gamma dose dependent, variations in GW and L/W ratio are moderately and the least variable, respectively. 200 Gy gamma is more effective dose to induce positive g TGW is highly positively correlated with two morphological traits, GA and GW in lines № 6(5), № 53(2), and № 49(6) in germplasm developed using 100 and 200 Gy, respectively. 4. There was a more positive association between GL and GW, GL and ratio L/W in mutant germpasm developed by 200 Gy (r=0. 90 and r=0. 56) than gempasm developed by 100 Gy (r=0. 55 and r=0. 01) 5. The L/W ratio shows very weak and middle correlation with GL and GW (r =0. 011 and r =0. 559, P < 0. 001), respectively in M 5 population obtained with the 100 Gy treatment. The L/W ratio very weakly and weakly correlated with either of the two main grain size variables (TGW and grain area, r =0. 021 and r=0. 258, P < 0. 001) suggesting that the relative proportions of the main growth axes of the grain, which largely describe grain shape, is independent of grain size.

Acknowledgements 1. This work was funded by Ministry of Education and Sciences of Kazakhstan

Acknowledgements 1. This work was funded by Ministry of Education and Sciences of Kazakhstan under the project “Development and study of wheat mutant lines to identify their valuable breeding forms and new alleles of genes controlling key adaptive properties”. 2. National IAEA KAZ 5003 “Increasing Micronutrient Content and Bioavailabilityin Wheat Germplasm by Means of an Integrated Approach” (2012 -2015).