LLRF Experience at the Spallation Neutron Source Mark

  • Slides: 18
Download presentation
LLRF Experience at the Spallation Neutron Source Mark Crofford Eu. CARD 2 Mini Workshop

LLRF Experience at the Spallation Neutron Source Mark Crofford Eu. CARD 2 Mini Workshop on LLRF and Beam Dynamics Mutual Needs June 2 & 3, 2015 ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle for the US Department of Energy

RF Systems – Outline • Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) Overview • SNS RF Systems

RF Systems – Outline • Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) Overview • SNS RF Systems – High Power Systems – Low-Level Systems – Reference System • LLRF Performance and Challenges • Cavity Regulation • Errant Beam Issues • Adaptive Feed-Forward and Beam Loss • Downtime Statistics • Summary 2 Eu. CARD 2 Mini Workshop on LLRF

Spallation Neutron Source Ring 1. 4 MW at 1. 0 Ge. V (1. 2

Spallation Neutron Source Ring 1. 4 MW at 1. 0 Ge. V (1. 2 MW now) Pulse on Target 1. 5 E 14 protons (24µC) Macro-pulse in Linac ~1000 mini pulses of ~24 m. A avg over 1 ms at 60 Hz 2. 5 Me. V 87 Me. V 186 Me. V 387 Me. V 1 ms H+ 1 ms beam into 700 ns Current Power on Target H+ Current • Neutron scattering facility to research properties of materials • 1 Ge. V Protons create neutrons through spallation process 670 ns 1000 Me. V HDTL SCL, b=0. 61 SCL, b=0. 81 Target Linac MEBT Current Source CCL 945 ns Mini pulse 1 ms macro-pulse N ~20– 100 x ILL Credit: W. Blokland – IBIC 2013 3 Eu. CARD 2 Mini Workshop on LLRF Flux RFQ H+

SNS High Power RF Systems MEBT RFQ & DTL CCL • 101 RF systems

SNS High Power RF Systems MEBT RFQ & DTL CCL • 101 RF systems are installed and operational Type Application Frequency Peak Power Vendor Installed Tetrode Ion Source 2 MHz 80 k. W Thales 1 Solid. State MEBT Rebunchers 402. 5 MHz 25 k. W Tomco 4 Klystron RFQ, DTL 402. 5 MHz 2. 5 MW E 2 V & Thales 7 Klystron CCL 805 MHz 5 MW Thales 4 Klystron SCL 805 MHz 550 -700 k. W CPI & Thales 81 Tetrode Accumulator Ring 1 & 2 MHz 500 k. W Thales & CPI 4 4 Eu. CARD 2 Mini Workshop on LLRF SCL Ring

SNS Low-Level RF Systems • Linac LLRF – 402. 5 & 805 MHz –

SNS Low-Level RF Systems • Linac LLRF – 402. 5 & 805 MHz – Field Control Module (FCM) – High-power Protection Module (HPM) – Down Converter FCM • Ring LLRF – 1. 05 & 2. 10 MHz – DSP based (Bitt. Ware quad DSP module) – 4 channel ADC module – 4 channel DAC module Down converter Linac LLRF Ring LLRF 5 Eu. CARD 2 Mini Workshop on LLRF HPM

SNS Linac RF Reference System • 402. 5 MHz section serves 11 systems: RFQ,

SNS Linac RF Reference System • 402. 5 MHz section serves 11 systems: RFQ, MEBT Rebunchers, and DTL • 805 MHz section serves 85 systems: CCL and SCL • 805 MHz section extends to the end of the Linac tunnel and is ready to support additional RF systems to be installed for the Second Target Station • Reference line is temperature and pressure regulated to improve stability Reference System 6 Eu. CARD 2 Mini Workshop on LLRF

LLRF Performance • The LLRF system continues to operate within specification • Automation has

LLRF Performance • The LLRF system continues to operate within specification • Automation has simplified operator interaction and improved cavity recovery – One button cavity startup eliminates operator error • Improvements and features added over time to overcome operational issues – Voltage droop – droop compensation added – Multipacting during cavity fill – slow ramp added to minimize reflected power – RFQ temperature stability - pulse width modulation added to improve temperature stability of the RFQ – Inadequate CPU speed – replaced IOCs with faster models to support full pulse operation 7 Eu. CARD 2 Mini Workshop on LLRF

LLRF Issues • 10 years of successful operation but some failures are starting to

LLRF Issues • 10 years of successful operation but some failures are starting to manifest • The output amplifier IC for the RF output circuit has shown step variations in the output level – Multiple failures in the past year – Traced the problem to bond wire failures – All amplifier ICs are being replaced during the calibration cycle of the system • System has several obsolete components including the FPGAs – Adequate spares are available – Redesign in consideration 8 Eu. CARD 2 Mini Workshop on LLRF

Cavity Regulation • Specification from the initial SNS Parameters document: – Static RF error:

Cavity Regulation • Specification from the initial SNS Parameters document: – Static RF error: +/- 1 degree, +/- 1 percent – Dynamic RF error: +/- 0. 5 degree, +/- 0. 5 percent – RMS or peak-to-peak error specifications would have been more useful Peak Regulation Error during the Beam Pulse (AFF) Beam Conditions • • • 0, 45 850 k. W on target 26. 3 m. A avg. 37. 8 m. A peak 0, 40 0, 35 Percent 0, 30 0, 25 0, 20 0, 15 0, 10 0, 00 Data taken 3/25/2015 9 Eu. CARD 2 Mini Workshop on LLRF RFQ MEBT 2 MEBT 4 DTL 2 DTL 4 DTL 6 CCL 2 CCL 4 SCL 01 b SCL 02 a SCL 02 c SCL 03 b SCL 04 a SCL 04 c SCL 05 b SCL 06 a SCL 06 c SCL 07 b SCL 08 a SCL 08 c SCL 09 b SCL 10 a SCL 10 c SCL 11 b SCL 12 a SCL 12 c SCL 13 a SCL 13 c SCL 14 a SCL 14 c SCL 15 a SCL 15 c SCL 16 a SCL 16 c SCL 17 a SCL 17 c SCL 18 a SCL 18 c SCL 19 a SCL 19 c SCL 20 a SCL 20 c SCL 21 a SCL 21 c SCL 22 a SCL 22 c SCL 23 a SCL 23 c 0, 05 Cavity

Errant Beam Definition • Abrupt beam loss caused by: – Low current or partial

Errant Beam Definition • Abrupt beam loss caused by: – Low current or partial beam pulses – Beam pulses with incorrect energy – Abrupt beam losses • SCL Beam Loss Monitors (BLM) are the primary indication of errant beam 10 Eu. CARD 2 Mini Workshop on LLRF Fast beam current monitor in MEBT Credit: C. Peters – AAC, 2013

Why is Errant Beam Important? • Errant beam mechanism – Beam hitting cavity surface

Why is Errant Beam Important? • Errant beam mechanism – Beam hitting cavity surface desorbs gas or particulates creating an environment for arcing • Super Conducting Linac (SCL) cavity performance degrades over time – SCL cavities do not trip with every errant beam pulse, but the probability for a trip increases with the frequency of bad pulses – Cavity fields have been decreased and cavities have been turned off resulting in lower beam energy • SCL cavity performance degradation from errant beam can be restored – Requires cavity warm up during a long shutdown and then RF conditioning before resuming beam operation – Cryomodules have been removed from the tunnel for cavity RF coupler repairs but this takes months C. Peters – AAC, 2013 11 Eu. CARD 2 Mini Workshop on LLRF

The Majority of Errant Beam Faults Originate in the Warm Linac • <10% of

The Majority of Errant Beam Faults Originate in the Warm Linac • <10% of BLM trips were due to the ion source/LEBT – Most ion source induced BLM trips occur during the first week of a new source installation • High voltage arcing • >90% of BLM trips were due to warm linac RF faults – RF faults occur at different times during the pulse • The majority of faults during the RF fill have reproducible times • Faults during the RF flattop are random – RF fill faults can be reduced • • Adjust the RF field Adjust the RF fill time Change the cavity resonant frequency Vacuum maintenance 12 Eu. CARD 2 Mini Workshop on LLRF Credit: C. Peters – AAC, 2013

Errant Beam Trips Reduced • Initially, ~75% (30 per day) of short trips were

Errant Beam Trips Reduced • Initially, ~75% (30 per day) of short trips were caused by errant beam • Errant beam trips have been reduced from 30 to 10 events a day • Green bars are actual errant beam trips. • SNS started specifically recording them in FY 14 • FY 15 reduction was during 850 k. W run FY 11 13 Eu. CARD 2 Mini Workshop on LLRF FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 Credit: C. Peters – IPAC, 2015

Adaptive Feed-forward • Simple approximation method – Correction = K[Kp*error + Ki*error_integral] • Utilized

Adaptive Feed-forward • Simple approximation method – Correction = K[Kp*error + Ki*error_integral] • Utilized for cavity filling and pulse-to-pulse feedback – Dual AFF buffers – Cavity filling AFF provides additional RF power to speed cavity filling • Ramp shape • Droop correction – Pulse-to-pulse provides correction for repetitive errors cause by beam loading, modulator ripple, and Lorentz force detuning 14 Eu. CARD 2 Mini Workshop on LLRF

Adaptive Feed-forward & Beam Loss • The adaptive feed-forward is sufficient but the learning

Adaptive Feed-forward & Beam Loss • The adaptive feed-forward is sufficient but the learning speed of the algorithm could be improved • Most noticeable during Physics shifts – 1 Hz operation – Beam setup variations • Learning is iterative, beam is lost during learning – AFF calculations occur at the IOC – limited to 20 Hz – Does not compensate for non-repetitive errors – Some guaranteed beam loss! • Improvements to the algorithm are being investigated 15 Eu. CARD 2 Mini Workshop on LLRF

RF Downtime – May 2013 to April 2015 • Total Downtime 265 hours out

RF Downtime – May 2013 to April 2015 • Total Downtime 265 hours out of 10303 scheduled Accelerator Physics/Neutron Production hours (2. 57%) • Warm Linac accounts for the majority of downtime 50 45 40 35 30 25 Total Downtime Beam Downtime 20 15 10 5 16 Eu. CARD 2 Mini Workshop on LLRF L 4 C C L 3 C C L 2 C C L 1 C C 6 TL D 5 TL D 4 TL D 3 TL D 2 TL D 1 TL D T 1 M EB T 2 M EB T 3 M EB T 4 EB M R FQ 0

RF Downtime (cont. ) • Occasional major event quickly adds to the system downtime

RF Downtime (cont. ) • Occasional major event quickly adds to the system downtime but this is only ~20% of the total downtime – DTL 6 circulator failure – 17 hours (June 2014) – CCL 2 klystron failure – 14 hours (May 2014) – CCL 3 klystron failure – 16 hours (Oct 2014) • Majority of warm linac trips are ~ 20 – 30 minutes in duration – Cavity and window arcing – Vacuum excursions/bursts • SC linac trips are ~5 – 10 minutes in duration – Errant beam • Overall reliability of the RF systems is very good – Continue to seek ways to improve the systems 17 Eu. CARD 2 Mini Workshop on LLRF

Summary • RF systems reliability is sufficient to achieve neutron production availability >90% •

Summary • RF systems reliability is sufficient to achieve neutron production availability >90% • Improvements in the LLRF and automation have simplified operation • Better understanding of errant beam causes has resulted in the reduction of downtime • Adaptive feed-forward was instrumental in achieving regulation requirements but there is room for improvement 18 Eu. CARD 2 Mini Workshop on LLRF