Literature Searches Online Google scholar http scholar google

Literature Searches On-line Google scholar - http: //scholar. google. com/ Citeseer - http: //citeseer. ist. psu. edu/ UI Library - http: //www. lib. uidaho. edu/

Literature Searches Backwards References [1] W. Banzhaf, P. Nordin, R. Keller, and F. Francone. Genetic Programming: An Introduction. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 1998. [2] K. Chellapilla. Evolving computer programs without subtree crossover. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 1(3): 209{216, 1997. [3] D. Goldberg. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Addison-Wesley. Reading, MA, 1989.

Literature Searches Forwards Google Scholar Language-based information-flow security - U Idaho Article Linker - group of 26 » A Sabelfeld, AC Myers - Selected Areas in Communications, IEEE Journal on, 2003 ieeexplore. ieee. org. . . 5 Language-Based Information-Flow Security Andrei Sabelfeld and Andrew C. Myers. . . Page 3. SABELFELD AND MYERS: LANGUAGE-BASED INFORMATION-FLOW SECURITY 7. . . Cited by 245 - Web Search - BL Direct Citeseer Language-Based Information-Flow Security - Sabelfeld, Myers(2002) (Correct) (68 citations) Communications, To Appear, 2002 1 Language-Based Information-Flow Security Andrei Sabelfeld Andrew C. A Program. Sabelfeld And Myers: Language-Based Information-Flow Security 3 Termination Channels Signal 2 (Sabelfeld And Myers: Language-Based Information-Flow Security 5 [e 1 -2] Exp : High H =2 www. cs. cornell. edu/~andrei/. /jsac. ps

Maintaining a Bibliography Keep an annotated electronic list of all papers read. Can easily cut and paste into bibliographies Latex does this “automatically” Endnotes for Word? Can easily find references Can easily refresh your memory on what was found.

Review/Survey Papers Good place to start Survey/Review Papers ACM Computing Surveys Journals like to publish review papers Impact factors: how often are papers in the journal cited in other journals (http: //en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Impact_factor)

Latex La. Te. X is a high-quality typesetting system Based on Te. X designed by Donald Knuth Uses commands to define parts of a document: title{The Title} Actual format is determined by the style definition, not the author documentclass[11 pt]{article}

Latex example documentclass{article} title{Robots are Cool} author{Jane Doe} date{September 1994} begin{document} maketitle Hello world! section{Background} Other cool researchcite{doe 2012} end{document}

Latex Great for equations Good for tables Can embed figures Good for bibliographies

Latex Bibliography teams. bib @article{just 1993 intensity, title={{The intensity dimension of thought: Pupillometric indices of sentence processing. }}, author={Just, M. A. and Carpenter, P. A. }, journal={Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology}, volume={47}, number={2}, pages={310 --339}, year={1993} } @article{… begin{document} … As demonstrated by doecite{just 1993 intensity} … bibliographystyle{plain} bibliography{teams} end{document}

Windows Latex Editors http: //en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Comparison_of _Te. X_editors

Reading Papers Need to read efficiently A survey paper or grant could have 100 -200 references. Read 50+ articles a year Need to know how your papers is going to be read. (? ? ? )

Reading Papers What do you want to learn? Just generally interested in the topic Want to know if the subject is relevant to your research Want to know what the authors’ concluded Want to learn about a new area of research How are you going to find out efficiently?

Reading Order Title – think about what it means Authors – do you know them? Keywords – semi-useful (ACM categories) Abstract – read more? Conclusions or Introduction – read more? Introduction or Conclusions – read more? Results Methods or background Background or methods

Reading Order Is the topic relevant? (title and abstract) Is it new? (abstract) What did they find? (abstract and conclusions) What does it mean? (abstract and conclusions) Are the results relevant? (conclusions and results (and methods)) Are the results trustworthy? (results and methods) Should I use their techniques? (methods)

Reading Papers Write on the paper Important points Weaknesses Counter-arguments Relevant papers Promising citations