Josephine San Dave Olney 18 August 1999 15

  • Slides: 13
Download presentation
Josephine San Dave Olney 18 August, 1999 15 July 1999 NASA/GSFC/IMDC

Josephine San Dave Olney 18 August, 1999 15 July 1999 NASA/GSFC/IMDC

 Appears to be Feasible Requirements Coarse Pointing baselined on NGST Future technology Control

Appears to be Feasible Requirements Coarse Pointing baselined on NGST Future technology Control modes Area of concerns 15 July 1999 NASA/GSFC/IMDC 2

 Pointing Requirements on Optical Spacecraft ACS ¥ Accuracy (1 s) : © Course

Pointing Requirements on Optical Spacecraft ACS ¥ Accuracy (1 s) : © Course (with tracker) Pitch/Yaw ± 2. 0 arcsec; Roll 20 arcsec © Fine (long term drift) pitch/yaw ± 0. 5 marcsec ¥ Jitter © Coarse © Fine ± 0. 1 arcsec ± 0. 1 marcsec Pointing Requirements on Detector Spacecraft ACS Stability (1 s) : ¥ Lateral Stability ¥ 15 July 1999 (1 s) : Pitch/Yaw ± 20 arcsec; Roll 20 arcsec 3 mm NASA/GSFC/IMDC 3

 Rate null/Sun Acquisition: null rates, point arrays normal to sun Sensors : Coarse

Rate null/Sun Acquisition: null rates, point arrays normal to sun Sensors : Coarse Sun Sensor, Gyro ¥ Actuator: options: large wheel/small wheel + good PAF/thruster ¥ Acquisition: acquire stars to establish reference attitude Sensors: HD 301 Star tracker(ST), Fine Sun Sensor (FSS), gyro (ring laser) ¥ Actuator: same as rate null/sun acquisition ¥ Science: inertial pointing Sensors: coarse pointing - ST, FSS, gyro; Fine pointing - instrument ¥ Actuator: options: /large wheel with thruster/PPT/small wheel with PPT ¥ Slew: eigenaxis rotation capability Sensor: gyro ¥ Actuator: options: wheel/PPT ¥ Safehold: independent safe mode, same as sun acquisition 15 July 1999 NASA/GSFC/IMDC 4

Detector ACS mode scenarios Rate null/Sun Acquisition: null rates, point arrays normal to sun

Detector ACS mode scenarios Rate null/Sun Acquisition: null rates, point arrays normal to sun ¥ Sensor same as Optics spacecraft; actuator can be wheel or thruster Initial Acquisition: acquire stars to establish reference attitude ¥ Sensors same ad Optics spacecraft’s acquisition; actuator same as sun acquisiton Science: inertial pointing Pointing: same as optics spacecraft coarse pointing ¥ Lateral control: laser and PPT ¥ Slew: Acquire optics spacecraft, acquire new target Sensor: gyro ¥ Actuator: wheel or thruster ¥ Delta V - Re-acquire new target position Safehold: independent safe mode, same as sun acquisition 15 July 1999 NASA/GSFC/IMDC 5

Actuator Selection Criteria Quantization - Science requirement Disturbance torque - Science requirement Torque Capability

Actuator Selection Criteria Quantization - Science requirement Disturbance torque - Science requirement Torque Capability - slew and solar torque Momentum capability Tip off rate ¥ Solar pressure at drift orbit ¥ © Solar force is about 0. 2 m N © Assuming 0. 1 meter cp offset for optics spacecraft, Solar torque is 20 micro Nm © In one day the momentum build up is about 1. 8 Nms 15 July 1999 NASA/GSFC/IMDC 6

Optics - sun acq/rate null Large wheel (80 Nms) Tip off rate less than

Optics - sun acq/rate null Large wheel (80 Nms) Tip off rate less than 0. 05 deg/sec ¥ Imbalance torque disturbance ¥ Weight and Power ¥ Small wheel (40 Nms)+ PAF Assuming with good PAF, tip off rate less than 0. 01 deg/sec ¥ 40 Nms wheel ¥ Weight and Power ¥ Thruster PPT is not sufficient to null the rate (0. 01 deg/sec) and acquire the sun ¥ hydrazine - Sloshing problem ¥ Cold gas - only choice ¥ 15 July 1999 NASA/GSFC/IMDC 7

Optics - SCIENCE PPT only ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ Better quantization* No need

Optics - SCIENCE PPT only ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ Better quantization* No need to unload momentum* No heritage yet, EO 1 will have one axis PPT control as test Need 12 PPT with no redundancy* Mass, power, cost Limited number (10 million) of firing (fire every 3 s for 1 year) Plume impingement Electro-magnetic contamination Need to further investigate items without ‘*’ 15 July 1999 Wheel with isolation; thruster for momentum unloading ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ NASA/GSFC/IMDC Quantization Need to unload momentum* Has heritage* Longer life time* With four wheel provides redundancy* Mass, power, cost Imbalance torque disturbance Same as PPT last item 8

Optics - Science (con’t) Small wheel with isolation /PPT ¥ Wheel for pointing, PPT

Optics - Science (con’t) Small wheel with isolation /PPT ¥ Wheel for pointing, PPT for momentum unloading © Finer quantization of wheel © Extend PPT life time ¥ Wheel for coarse pointing, PPT for fine pointing and momentum unloading © Better quantization for fine pointing © Extend PPT lifetime ¥ Depend on the actuator induced disturbance and other studies 15 July 1999 NASA/GSFC/IMDC 9

Optics - Slew Wheel Less than 6 hours to slew 45 degree ¥ Remain

Optics - Slew Wheel Less than 6 hours to slew 45 degree ¥ Remain a zero-momentum system ¥ PPT 12 hours to slew 45 degree ¥ After the slew, the system momentum may not be zero ¥ 15 July 1999 NASA/GSFC/IMDC 10

Technology New Generation Integrated Wheel and electronic all integrated ¥ Low noise, low imbalance

Technology New Generation Integrated Wheel and electronic all integrated ¥ Low noise, low imbalance torque, low power ¥ Spartan 400 series and Triana heritage ¥ New Generation Star Tracker NGST heritage ¥ Accuracy 1. 35 arcsec accuracy per star ¥ Pulse Plasma Thruster ¥ As three axis fine control actuator 15 July 1999 NASA/GSFC/IMDC 11

 PPT concerns Plume impingement, EMI, Life time ¥ Maintain a zero momentum system

PPT concerns Plume impingement, EMI, Life time ¥ Maintain a zero momentum system ¥ A better solar torque estimation Tracking strategy of optics and detector spacecraft Fine pointing Strategies Operation scenarios post separation Null rate before separate two spacecraft ¥ Rate after two spacecraft separation ¥ What is the rate after two spacecraft separation ¥ 15 July 1999 NASA/GSFC/IMDC 12

Component (wheel option) 15 July 1999 NASA/GSFC/IMDC 13

Component (wheel option) 15 July 1999 NASA/GSFC/IMDC 13