Flow and Centrality fluctuations in ATLAS Jiangyong Jia

  • Slides: 25
Download presentation
Flow and Centrality fluctuations in ATLAS Jiangyong Jia for the ATLAS Collaboration Stony Brook

Flow and Centrality fluctuations in ATLAS Jiangyong Jia for the ATLAS Collaboration Stony Brook University Based on ar. Xiv: 1904. 04808 QM 2019 11/3 -11/9/2019 1

Origin of flow/centrality fluctuations Many collisions Each with own evolution … … Event by

Origin of flow/centrality fluctuations Many collisions Each with own evolution … … Event by event fluctuations: n Same N can have different shapes flow fluctuation n Same N can have different sizes centrality fluctuation 2

Observables for flow fluctuations n Cumulants for p(vn) n Mixed-harmonic cumulants for p(vn, vm).

Observables for flow fluctuations n Cumulants for p(vn) n Mixed-harmonic cumulants for p(vn, vm). Not discussed here, see 1904. 04808 3 All results cross-checked with subevent method to ensure non-flow is negligible n Current paradigm: L. Yan, J. Ollitrault ar. Xiv: 1312. 6555 Fine splitting of vn{2 k} reflects the fine splitting of εn{2 k} between k=1, 2, 3…

v 2 and v 3 from 4 -particle cumulants n Clear p. T dependence

v 2 and v 3 from 4 -particle cumulants n Clear p. T dependence in cumulant ratios n v 2{4}/v 2{2} decreases with p. T, v 3{4}/v 3{2} increases with p. T Role of initial-state sub-leading eccentricity or final state fluctuations? 4

v 2 from 6 -particle cumulants n Excellent agreement among experiments n but much

v 2 from 6 -particle cumulants n Excellent agreement among experiments n but much better precision 5

v 2 from 6 -particle cumulants n Excellent agreement among experiments n n but

v 2 from 6 -particle cumulants n Excellent agreement among experiments n n but much better precision Clear p. T dependence seen n n Increase in central region Decrease in peripheral region Role of initial-state sub-leading eccentricity or final state fluctuations? 6

Constraining the initial-state fluctuations v 2{6}/v 2{4} vs. v 2{4}/v 2{2} has weaker p.

Constraining the initial-state fluctuations v 2{6}/v 2{4} vs. v 2{4}/v 2{2} has weaker p. T dependence more related to IS geometry v 2{6}/v 2{4} n 7 5% Central 25% Peripheral 65% v 2{4}/v 2{2}

Constraining the initial-state fluctuations v 2{6}/v 2{4} vs. v 2{4}/v 2{2} has weaker p.

Constraining the initial-state fluctuations v 2{6}/v 2{4} vs. v 2{4}/v 2{2} has weaker p. T dependence more related to IS geometry n n 2 -component Glauber model agrees better with Pb+Pb data Glauber model fails in peripheral region, where data approach fluctuation-driven model CMS v 2{6}/v 2{4} n 8 5% Central 25% 65% Peripheral Fluctuation-driven model describes p. Pb v 2{4}/v 2{2}

v 4 from 4 -particle cumulants n c 4{4} changes sign around 25% centrality,

v 4 from 4 -particle cumulants n c 4{4} changes sign around 25% centrality, also depends on p. T. n v 4 has non-linear contribution from v 2: , but not enough quantitatively ar ine n-l No G. Giacalone, L. Yan, J. Noronha-Hostler, J. Ollitrault, 1608. 06022 L a e n i r 9

v 4 from 4 -particle cumulants n c 4{4} changes sign around 25% centrality,

v 4 from 4 -particle cumulants n c 4{4} changes sign around 25% centrality, also depends on p. T. n n 10 v 4 has non-linear contribution from v 2: , but not enough quantitatively v 4{4}/v 4{2}~0. 5 in central region, magnitude reach >1 in peripheral region v 4{4}/v 4{2} ar ine n-l No L a e n i r G. Giacalone, L. Yan, J. Noronha-Hostler, J. Ollitrault, 1608. 06022 Implies large non-Gaussian fluctuation in peripheral collisions!

Centrality in A+A collisions n 11 Many variables to quantify centrality/volume. n n At

Centrality in A+A collisions n 11 Many variables to quantify centrality/volume. n n At initial state: b, Npart , x. Npart+(1 -x) Ncoll, Nqp , … At final state: Nch, ET, Nneutron, … Initial state sources: V Final state particles: N Vb Experimental use: Nb |η|<1 Subevent B Measurement Va Na 3<|η|<5 η Subevent A Event selection

Cent 2 How to detect centrality fluctuation? If no fluctuation: Cent 1 <cent 2>

Cent 2 How to detect centrality fluctuation? If no fluctuation: Cent 1 <cent 2> in narrow slices of cent 1 <Cent 2> <Cent 1> <cent 1> in narrow slices of cent 2 Cent 1 12

Cent 2 How to detect centrality fluctuation? Now smears along cent 1 direction with

Cent 2 How to detect centrality fluctuation? Now smears along cent 1 direction with fluctuation: <cent 2> increases more slowly with cent 1, due to poorer centrality resolution or more centrality fluctuation of cent 1. Cent 1 <cent 2> in narrow slices of cent 1 <Cent 2> <Cent 1> <cent 1> in narrow slices of cent 2 Cent 2 This relation remains linear Cent 1 Non-linearity expected in ultra-central region 13

5. 02 Te. V Pb+Pb |η|<2. 5 Observation of centrality resolution in the data

5. 02 Te. V Pb+Pb |η|<2. 5 Observation of centrality resolution in the data 3<|η|<5 Cent in |η|<2. 5 has poorer centrality resolution than 3<|η|<5 14

|η|<2. 5 Impact centrality fluctuation for flow observables p 1(vn) p 2(vn) 3<|η|<5 Even

|η|<2. 5 Impact centrality fluctuation for flow observables p 1(vn) p 2(vn) 3<|η|<5 Even if <ET> and <Nch> are same, p 1(vn) and p 2(vn) could still be different 15

Centrality fluctuation and v 2 -slope in ultra-central collisions |η|<2. 5 ar. Xiv: 1803.

Centrality fluctuation and v 2 -slope in ultra-central collisions |η|<2. 5 ar. Xiv: 1803. 01812 3<|η|<5 16

Centrality fluctuation and v 2 -slope in ultra-central collisions 17 at same Nch |η|<2.

Centrality fluctuation and v 2 -slope in ultra-central collisions 17 at same Nch |η|<2. 5 ar. Xiv: 1803. 01812 3<|η|<5 Larger centrality fluctuation for Nch-bin(mid-η) than for ET-bin(forward-η) Significant centrality decorrelation along η

Effects of centrality fluctuation on higher-order cumulants ~0. 2 n Direct comparison: difference largest

Effects of centrality fluctuation on higher-order cumulants ~0. 2 n Direct comparison: difference largest in UCC, persists to mid-central collisions nc 2{4, Nch} (ΣET) obtained by map Nch to <ΣET> n Sign change in UCC! CF influences cn{4} over a broad centrality range! ~0. 05 18

Effects of centrality fluctuation on higher-order cumulants 19 ~0. 2 ~0. 08 n Direct

Effects of centrality fluctuation on higher-order cumulants 19 ~0. 2 ~0. 08 n Direct comparison: difference largest in UCC, persists to mid-central collisions nc 2{4, Nch} (ΣET) obtained by map Nch to <ΣET> n Sign change in UCC! CF influences cn{4} over a broad centrality range! Glauber study show multiplicity smearing change sign of eccentricity cumulants ~0. 05 ar. Xiv: 1803. 01812

Centrality/size fluctuation in central collision Modification of dynamic fluctuations in ultra-central collisions seen in

Centrality/size fluctuation in central collision Modification of dynamic fluctuations in ultra-central collisions seen in several observables v 22 fluctuation v 22<p. T> correlation <p. T> fluctuation See Tomasz Bold Wed 10: 20 Provide a way to study the nature of centrality and particle production mechanism 20

Summary 21 n Space-time dynamics of HI collisions studied via flow fluctuations and centrality

Summary 21 n Space-time dynamics of HI collisions studied via flow fluctuations and centrality fluctuations n Flow cumulants show p. T dependence εn not the only source for flow fluctuations n Provide new constrains on the initial-state fluctuations. Intriguing sign change of c 4{4} in mid-central collisions: mixing between v 2 and v 4? n Flow fluctuations sensitive to centrality resolution or volume fluctuations n Reflected by sign-change of many cumulants observables in UCC Flow fluctuations can be used to elucidate nature of centrality & particle production mechanism

Mix-harmonics n n Anti-corr. between v 2&v 3 reflects anti-corr. between ε 2&ε 3

Mix-harmonics n n Anti-corr. between v 2&v 3 reflects anti-corr. between ε 2&ε 3 ; strong p. T dependence Correlation between v 2 & v 4 mode-mixing of ; weak p. T dependence 22

Centrality fluctuation on mix-harmonic cumulants n n Centrality fluctuation effects is large for v

Centrality fluctuation on mix-harmonic cumulants n n Centrality fluctuation effects is large for v 2 -v 3 correlation CF effects much smaller for v 2 - v 4 correlation, still visible in UCC 23

Four-particle cumulant for v 1 n Rapidity-even v 1 from dipolar fluctuations v 1{2}

Four-particle cumulant for v 1 n Rapidity-even v 1 from dipolar fluctuations v 1{2} changes sign at p. T~1. 2 Ge. V, v 1{4} measurable only at large p. T 24 1203. 3087

Four-particle cumulant for v 1 n Rapidity-even v 1 from dipolar fluctuations n c

Four-particle cumulant for v 1 n Rapidity-even v 1 from dipolar fluctuations n c 1{4}<0 observed at high p. T. n v 1{4} increase from central to peripheral. n Ranges from 1 to 4% 25 1203. 3087 v 1{2} changes sign at p. T~1. 2 Ge. V, v 1{4} measurable only at large p. T v 1{4} c 1{4}