Attenuation of photons in matter Lecture 4 Photon

  • Slides: 10
Download presentation
Attenuation of photons in matter Lecture 4

Attenuation of photons in matter Lecture 4

Photon interaction in matter Main photon interactions in matter: • Photoelectric effect • Compton

Photon interaction in matter Main photon interactions in matter: • Photoelectric effect • Compton scattering • Pair production These processes have (relatively) small cross section and absorb the photon completely (remove it from the beam) Comparison with charged particles: 1. X-and γ -rays are many times more penetrating in matter than charged particles. 2. Beam of photons is not degraded in energy, only attenuated in intensity! For a layer of thickness x (mass thickness X=ρx) μ: linear absorption coefficient μ/ρ: mass absorption coefficient Relation to photon absorption cross section: ma: Molar mass σ γ : Total cross section of the photon At high energies:

Electron - Photon shower High energy electron: Bremsstrahlung on average after X 0 High

Electron - Photon shower High energy electron: Bremsstrahlung on average after X 0 High energy photon: pair production on average after 9/7 X 0 electron-photon shower (e, γ give the same signal at high energies!) γ: yellow e-: green e+: red After t radiation length: N=2 t particles, each with energy: Shower continues until critical energy is reached: γ: not drawn e-: green e+: red Once the electrons and photons are at low energies they scatter and result in a large number of low energy photons. Exact d. E/dt behaviour from Monte-Carlo simulations: http: //www 2. slac. stanford. edu/vvc/egs/basicsimtool. html (simulation toy tool) Photon induced showers start a bit later than electron induced, showers (initial pair production has to occur)

Transverse dimension of shower by multiple scattering of electrons, useful unit is the Molière

Transverse dimension of shower by multiple scattering of electrons, useful unit is the Molière radius: Material independent: 95% of shower contained in 2 RM 99% in 3. 5 RM

Interaction of Neutrons in matter Neutrons: neutral -> no (direct ionization) Main interaction: strong

Interaction of Neutrons in matter Neutrons: neutral -> no (direct ionization) Main interaction: strong nuclear force Very short range -> n are very penetration in matter! Main interactions: • Elastic scattering off nuclei (Me. V energies) • Inelastic scattering off nuclei (E>1 Me. V) -> excited nucleus • Radiative neutron capture (n captured, γ emitted) • Other neutron capture (n captured, p, d, t, α…emitted) • Fission • High energy: hadronic shower production Ionization from secondary particles (recoil nucleus, p emitted, …) -> danger to human tissue Like photons, neutrons are absorbed in most processes -> attenuation of beam: : neutron absorption length

Neutrino interaction in matter Only week interaction -> extremely penetrating Charged (W+ , W-

Neutrino interaction in matter Only week interaction -> extremely penetrating Charged (W+ , W- -exchange) or neutral (Z 0 -exchange) current interactions with nuclei or electrons. Some examples: Charged current: Neutral current: (Sudbury Neutrino Observatory) SNO)

Dead time = time after receiving an event, during which the detector cannot process

Dead time = time after receiving an event, during which the detector cannot process a new event. Non-paralysable detector: Detector not affected by events arriving during dead-time. True event rate: R, measured event rate: R’ ==> detector dead for fraction of time Rate of lost events: or Paralysable detector: Every event paralyses the detector for time τ. True event rate: R, measured event rate: R’ Consider time distribution of time intervals T between events: Probability for no event during time T is (Poisson, n=0) Distribution of time intervals also (intervals come at the same rate as the events) Probability for time interval larger than dead time τ(average) The fraction of measured events is R’=RP (T>τ) : not solvable for R! (for Rτ<<1) (W. R. Leo) as for the non-paralysable

Detection efficiency Numerator easy to define, but caution with the denominator! ε depends on

Detection efficiency Numerator easy to define, but caution with the denominator! ε depends on geometry and interaction probability in general not independent from each other; path length depends on geometry for instance. Often, path length independent of geometry ==> ε factorizable Geometry: independent of particle type = acceptance Intrinsic: depends on particle type Measurement for simple components in sandwich configuration. independent of εS ! For large detector systems: Use Monte Carlo simulation!

Resolution, linearity, bias Property A of particle (energy, mass, …) measured by detector repeat

Resolution, linearity, bias Property A of particle (energy, mass, …) measured by detector repeat measurement for same situation measurements a 1, a 2, a 3, …, an Resolution: Width of the distribution of values {ai} obtained in the measurement of a constant property A [more mathematically: width of output distribution for monochromatic input distribution δ(A) ] Two quantities are quoted for resolution: Standard deviation: Full width at half maximum: (FWHM) Δa For Gaussian distribution: For box distribution: Relative resolution: Relation between <a> and true property A: If c constant: linear detector Non-linearity:

Fano Factor Measurement of ionization: resolution depends on number N=E/wi of liberated primary charge

Fano Factor Measurement of ionization: resolution depends on number N=E/wi of liberated primary charge carriers (a statistical process), if Poisson statistics and N>20 ~Gaussian response function with == > relative resolution : But: assumption of Poisson statistics is wrong if constraints from energy and/or momentum are present! For instance: • • Total energy is deposited: E cannot fluctuate Momentum conservation in lattice requires part of the energy to go into lattice vibrations (phonons) (this is the case in semiconductors) In such cases smaller fluctuations == > better resolution! F: Fano factor Roughly: F=1 for Scintillators F=0. 2 for gas detectors F=0. 1 for semiconductor detectors F is measured empirically – it is still poorly understood theoretically.