Air Canada Flight 143 Ken Duenwald Overview The

  • Slides: 11
Download presentation
Air Canada Flight 143 Ken Duenwald

Air Canada Flight 143 Ken Duenwald

Overview • The Incident • The Causes – Damaged Fuel Gauge Processor – Crew

Overview • The Incident • The Causes – Damaged Fuel Gauge Processor – Crew Assumptions – Unit Conversion Error • Summary – Lessons Learned

The Incident • 23 July 1983 • New Boeing 767 • Scheduled Montreal to

The Incident • 23 July 1983 • New Boeing 767 • Scheduled Montreal to Edmonton Flight • Fuel exhausted midflight • Diverted to Gimli, Manitoba http: //presurfer. blogspot. com/2007/11/gimli-glider. html http: //www. wadenelson. com/gimli. html

Damaged Fuel Gauge Processor • Dual Channel System • Faulty inductor coil in one

Damaged Fuel Gauge Processor • Dual Channel System • Faulty inductor coil in one channel, gauges blank • Damaged channel disabled, gauges restored • Damaged channel later reactivated http: //www. isplc 2006. org/b 2 b/crude_oil/1/

Crew Assumptions • Malfunction and blank gauges noted • Manual Fuel Measurement • Flight

Crew Assumptions • Malfunction and blank gauges noted • Manual Fuel Measurement • Flight crew assumptions vs. Minimum Equipment List http: //jetphotos. net http: //users. telenet. be/dkaviation

Unit Conversion Error • • • Volume vs. Weight 22, 300 kg. of fuel

Unit Conversion Error • • • Volume vs. Weight 22, 300 kg. of fuel required 7, 682 liters measured before refuel Metric System new in Canada Incorrect mass to volume conversion (lb vs. kg) Fuel Quantity Correct value Calculated Value Conversion Factor 0. 803 kg/liter 1. 77 lb/liter Weight before refuel 6, 169 kg 13, 597 lb Weight required to refuel 16, 131 kg 8, 703 lb Volume required to refuel 20, 088 liters 4, 916 liters Total Fuel 22, 300 kg 22, 300 lb (10, 116 kg) Source: Flight Safety Australia

Summary • Fuel Exhaustion Mid-flight • Causes – Mechanical Flaws – Human Error •

Summary • Fuel Exhaustion Mid-flight • Causes – Mechanical Flaws – Human Error • Lessons Learned

How the plane was landed • • No fuel, power, hydraulics, or electronics Ram

How the plane was landed • • No fuel, power, hydraulics, or electronics Ram air turbine provided basic systems Side-slip (Crab) Configuration Increased descent without increased speed http: //blog. fagstein. com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/

Damaged Processor Details • Design Faults – Cold Solder Joint – Dual Channel Flaw

Damaged Processor Details • Design Faults – Cold Solder Joint – Dual Channel Flaw • Malfunction Log Error http: //workmanship. nasa. gov/lib/insp/2%20 books/links/sections/601%20 General%20 Requirements. html

Why volume vs. weight • Ground crew only considers how much fuel to add

Why volume vs. weight • Ground crew only considers how much fuel to add – Volume easier to measure • Pilots consider weight for various factors – Take-off – Cruise Speed – Landing • Adequate amount without excess weight

Aftermath • Plane repaired and resumed service • Government Recommendations – Metric conversion training

Aftermath • Plane repaired and resumed service • Government Recommendations – Metric conversion training – More spare parts • Improved training with new aircraft • Aircraft design improvements • Ethical Improvements