Update Treatment and Prophylaxis of Pertussis with Macrolide

  • Slides: 23
Download presentation
Update Treatment and Prophylaxis of Pertussis with Macrolide Antibiotics Tejpratap Tiwari, M. D. ,

Update Treatment and Prophylaxis of Pertussis with Macrolide Antibiotics Tejpratap Tiwari, M. D. , Bacterial Vaccine Preventable Diseases Branch Epidemiology and Surveillance Division National Immunization Program Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Immunization Conference March 22, 2005

Background: Erythromycin • Accepted antibiotic of choice for pertussis treatment, prophylaxis • Usually recommended

Background: Erythromycin • Accepted antibiotic of choice for pertussis treatment, prophylaxis • Usually recommended as 14 -day course to prevent bacteriologic relapse • Inexpensive

Erythromycin Compliance and Safety • Compliance: ~20% patients discontinue – Gastrointestinal side effects (~30%)

Erythromycin Compliance and Safety • Compliance: ~20% patients discontinue – Gastrointestinal side effects (~30%) – Demanding regimen (3 - 4 daily doses, 14 days) • Safety – Increased risk infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS), infants <2 weeks old* – Drug-interactions, cytochrome P 450 *Mahon et al. J Pediatr 2001; 139: 380 – 4

Azithromycin and Clarithromycin vs Erythromycin • Good in vitro activity against Bordetella pertussis •

Azithromycin and Clarithromycin vs Erythromycin • Good in vitro activity against Bordetella pertussis • More resistant to acid p. H, better absorbed • Greater tissue concentrations, longer plasma half-life • Fewer (1 or 2) daily doses, shorter course (5 days or 7 days)

Azithromycin (A) and Clarithromycin (C) Clinical Studies Author (Year) Study Design Aoyoma et al.

Azithromycin (A) and Clarithromycin (C) Clinical Studies Author (Year) Study Design Aoyoma et al. 1996) Randomized Control Group Study Arms Historical control group A (8) , C( 9) v E(16, 18) Bace et al. (1999) Noncomparative Safety, two dose regime A (17) v A (20) Bace et al. (2000)* Randomized Erythromycin A(9) v E(15) Pichichero (2003) Noncomparative Historical studies Erythromycin group A (34) Langely et al. (2004) Randomized Lebel et al. (2001) *Abstract Randomized A( 58) v E (57) C (31) vs E (23)

Treatment for Pertussis by Age-group Age group Erythromycin Clarithromycin Azithromycin >6 mth 40 -50

Treatment for Pertussis by Age-group Age group Erythromycin Clarithromycin Azithromycin >6 mth 40 -50 mg/kg/d in 4 divided doses (max 2 gm/d) X 14 d 15 mg/kg/day in 2 divided doses (max 500 mg/dose) X 7 d 10 mg/kg/day (max 500 mg) single dose on day 1 then 5 mg/kg/day (max 250 mg) on day 2 – 5 1 -5 mth As above 10 mg/kg/day, single daily dose X 5 d <1 mth Use as alternate drug in (Safety data doses above (Risk of unavailable) IHPS) Preferred drug Dose as above

Summary • Macrolides, preferred antimicrobial agents – Erythromycin, clarithromycin, or azithromycin are appropriate first-line

Summary • Macrolides, preferred antimicrobial agents – Erythromycin, clarithromycin, or azithromycin are appropriate first-line agents for persons age >1 month – Azithromycin, preferred choice for infants <1 month of age • Use TMX-SMZ as alternate agent • Consider safety, evaluate concurrent medications for potential interactions, adherence to the prescribed regimen, and cost

Acknowledgements • CDC/NIP – Colleagues at Bacterial VPD Branch, Epidemiology and Surveillance Division •

Acknowledgements • CDC/NIP – Colleagues at Bacterial VPD Branch, Epidemiology and Surveillance Division • AAP/COID • AAFP • HICPAC

Thank You

Thank You

RED BOOK 2003: Pertussis Treatment • “The drug of choice is erythromycin estolate (40

RED BOOK 2003: Pertussis Treatment • “The drug of choice is erythromycin estolate (40 – 50 mg per day, orally in 4 divided doses; maximum 2 g/day. The recommended duration of therapy to prevent relapse is 14 days. Studies have documented that the newer macrolides, azithromycin dihydrate (10– 12 mg kg per day, orally, in 1 dose for 5 days; maximum 600 mg day) or clarithromycin (15– 20 mg/kg per day, orally, in 2 divided doses; maximum 1 g/day for 7 days), may be as effective as erythromycin and have fewer adverse effects and better compliance. ”

EXTRA SLIDES

EXTRA SLIDES

HICPAC Guidelines, 2004 Pertussis Treatment and Prophylaxis • Adults – Erythromycin estolate, 500 mg,

HICPAC Guidelines, 2004 Pertussis Treatment and Prophylaxis • Adults – Erythromycin estolate, 500 mg, 4 times/day – Erythromycin delayed-release tablet, 333 mg, 3 times daily, • Children age >2 weeks, – Erythromycin 40– 50 mg/kg day for 14 days • Infants aged <2 weeks, or adults intolerant to EE – Azithromycin 10– 12 mg/kg/day x 5– 7 days – Azithromycin 10 mg/kg on Day 1 then 5 mg/kg/day x 4 days (single dose) – Clarithromycin for 10– 14 days 15– 20 mg/kg/day in two divided doses

Control of Communicable Diseases, 2004 Pertussis Treatment and Prophylaxis • Treatment – Minimum 7

Control of Communicable Diseases, 2004 Pertussis Treatment and Prophylaxis • Treatment – Minimum 7 -day course of macrolide antibiotics • Chemoprophylaxis (selective) – A 7 -day course of erythromycin, clarithromycin or azithromycin

Langley et al. , 2004 * Azithromycin vs Erythromycin • Multi-center, randomized, equivalence trial

Langley et al. , 2004 * Azithromycin vs Erythromycin • Multi-center, randomized, equivalence trial • Suspect pertussis cases (n=477), aged 6 months – 16 years – Azithromycin (n=238) • 10 mg/kg single dose day 1; then 5 mg/kg/day single daily dose days 2– 5 – Erythromycin estolate (n=239) • 40 mg/kg/day, 3 doses/day x 10 days *Langley et al. Pediatrics 2004; 114: 96 – 101

Langley et al. , 2004* Safety Cohort (N=477) • Rate of gastrointestinal adverse events

Langley et al. , 2004* Safety Cohort (N=477) • Rate of gastrointestinal adverse events – Azithromycin group (n=238): 18% – Erythromycin group (n=239): 40% • Compliance with 100% doses – Azithromycin, 90% – Erythromycin, 55% *Langley et al. Pediatrics 2004; 114: 96 – 101

Efficacy Cohort* Culture-confirmed pertussis (N=114) • Bacterial eradication at end of treatment – Azithromycin

Efficacy Cohort* Culture-confirmed pertussis (N=114) • Bacterial eradication at end of treatment – Azithromycin (days 5 – 7) • (n=53), 100% (95% CI: 93– 100) – Erythromycin (days 10 – 12) • (n=53), 100% (95% CI: 93 – 100) • Recurrence, 1 week post-treatment – Azithromycin (n=51), 0% (95% CI: 0– 7) – Erythromycin (n=53), 0% (95% CI: 0– 6. 7) *Langley et al. Pediatrics 2004; 114: 96 – 101

Lebel et al. , 2001* Clarithromycin vs Erythromycin • • Randomized, prospective, single-blind Compared

Lebel et al. , 2001* Clarithromycin vs Erythromycin • • Randomized, prospective, single-blind Compared safety, efficacy Suspect pertussis (n=153) Ages 1 month – 16 years – Erythromycin estolate, 40 mg/kg/day (max 1 gm daily), 3 doses/day X 14 days (n=77) – Clarithromycin, 15 mg/kg/day (max 1 gm daily), 2 doses/day X 7 days (n=76) *Lebel et al. PIDJ 2001; 20: 1149 – 54.

Lebel et al. , 2001* Safety Cohort (N=153) • Rates of gastrointestinal adverse events

Lebel et al. , 2001* Safety Cohort (N=153) • Rates of gastrointestinal adverse events – Clarithromycin (n=76): 32% – Erythromycin (n=77): 44% • Compliance (mean % of drug taken) – Clarithromycin, 98. 5% – Erythromycin, 88. 6% *Lebel et al. PIDJ 2001; 20: 1149 – 54.

Efficacy Cohort Culture-confirmed pertussis (N=62) • Post-treatment bacterial eradication similar – Clarithromycin (days 8–

Efficacy Cohort Culture-confirmed pertussis (N=62) • Post-treatment bacterial eradication similar – Clarithromycin (days 8– 10 ), (31/31) – Erythromycin (days 15– 18), (22/23) • Study limitation – Sample size insufficient to demonstrate equivalence Lebel et al. PIDJ, 2001; 20: 1149 – 54.

Azithromycin, Clarithromycin Safety in Infants Age <6 months • Not labeled for use in

Azithromycin, Clarithromycin Safety in Infants Age <6 months • Not labeled for use in infants <6 months age* – No published report IHPS or severe adverse events in neonates *http: //pdrel. thomsonhc. com/

Macrolides Safety: FDA Pregnancy Label • Erythromycin, azithromycin (Category B) – Animal studies, no

Macrolides Safety: FDA Pregnancy Label • Erythromycin, azithromycin (Category B) – Animal studies, no adverse effect on fetus – No clinical trials in pregnant women • Clarithromycin (Category C) – Animal studies, adverse effects on fetus – No clinical trials in pregnancy http: //pdrel. thomsonhc. com/

HIPAC Guidelines Hypersensitivity to Macrolides • Adults: – Trimethoprim (TMP) –sulfamethoxazole (SXT) 1 double-strength

HIPAC Guidelines Hypersensitivity to Macrolides • Adults: – Trimethoprim (TMP) –sulfamethoxazole (SXT) 1 double-strength tablet, twice daily X 14 days • Children: – 8 mg/kg/day TMP, 40 mg/kg/day SXT, 2 divided doses • Exception: – Pregnant woman at term – Nursing mother – Infant aged <2 months)

Differences in Microbiologic Eradication Rates, 95% CI Author (Year) Microbiologic Eradication Rate (%) Comparison

Differences in Microbiologic Eradication Rates, 95% CI Author (Year) Microbiologic Eradication Rate (%) Comparison Groups Difference between rates (95% CI) Aoyama (1996) A – 100 (8/8) C – 100 (9/9) E – 89 (16/18) A (8) v E (16) C (9) v E (18) 11 (-24 – 34) 11 (-23 – 34) Bace (2000) A – 100 (9/9) E – 100 (15/15) A(9) v E (15) 0 (-33 – 21) Lebel (2001) C – 100 (31/31) E – 96 (22/23) C (31) v E (23) 4 (-7 – 22) Av. E 0 (-7 – 7) Halperin (2004) A – 100 (53/53 E – 100 (53/53)