Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme USOAP Continuous Monitoring

Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme (USOAP) - Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Henry Gourdji Chief, Safety Oversight Audit Section HIGH LEVEL SAFETY CONFERENCE Montreal 29 March 2010 1 HLSC, 29 March to 1 April 2010

Overview QBackground QOur Marching Orders QObjective of CMA QTransition Plan QImpact on Member States QCMA Benefits 2 HLSC, 29 March to 1 April 2010

Background – Evolution of the USOAP 35 TH A Mandatory S Audit Programme S (USOAP) E 1999 – 2004 M B Annexes 1, 6, 8 L Annex-by-Annex Y Approach ’ 04 36 TH Comprehensive A Systems S Approach S E 2005 + 2010 M B Safety-related L Provisions in all Y Safety-related Annexes ’ 07 CMA USOAP beyond 2010 A 36 -4 3 HLSC, 29 March to 1 April 2010

Our Marching Orders ✓ Consider options for the evolution of USOAP beyond 2010 based on the concept of continuous monitoring. ✓ To incorporate the analysis of safety risk factors, and apply them on a universal basis, to assess, on an ongoing basis, States’ oversight capability. • Assembly Resolution A 36 -4 refers HLSC, 29 March to 1 April 2010 4

CMA Developed with Global Input CMA WORKING GROUP CMA ADVISORY GROUP CMA STEERING COMITTEE CMA METHODOLOGY HLSC, 29 March to 1 April 2010 5

CMA Selected the Best Approach for the Future Study ICAO Council • Comprehensive Study performed July 2008 • Identified all Options, Advantages /Disadvantages versus Associated costs • Study Group Results presented to ANC (181 st) & Council (185 th) Session • Council Decision to support CMA as the best option forward (C-WP/13356 refers) • CMA to include a transition plan to prepare States and ICAO Transition • Following the transition period CMA will be launched starting 2013 Plan 6 HLSC, 29 March to 1 April 2010

Objective of USOAP- CMA Beyond 2010 ✓ Promote global aviation safety through continuously monitoring States’ safety oversight capabilities ✓ Enhance States’ safety oversight and safety management capabilities by: • Identifying safety deficiencies; • Assessing associated safety risks; • Developing strategies for intervention and assistance; and • Prioritize assistance. 7 HLSC, 29 March to 1 April 2010

Transition Plan 2011 2012 • State • Update CAP • Update SAAQ • ICAO • DOC 9735 • Seminar Workshops • CBT Auditor Training • ICVM missions • Expand agreements • State • Update CAP • Update SAAQ • Audit protocols • ICAO • CBT Auditor Training • Intervention strategies • ICVM missions • Safety audits 2013 • State • Update CAP • Update SAAQ • Audit protocols • ICAO • CBT Auditor Training • Intervention strategies • ICVMs • Safety audits • CSA audits + limited 8 HLSC, 29 March to 1 April 2010

CMA Cycle Chart • States • Internal Stakeholders • External Stakeholders • • • Collect & Validate Safety Data Analyze and measure States safety oversight capability Develop & Implement Intervention Strategies Identify & Prioritize Deficiencies Strategies such as: CSA Audits Limited CSA Audits ICVMs Safety Audits Other missions • Analysis of safety risk factors • Assessing the safety level of State aviation activities using the 8 critical elements • Evaluating State safety management capabilities • Integrated safety analysis • Mandatory Information requests • Findings and Recommendations • SSCs HLSC, 29 March to 1 April 2010 9

State obligations during the transition period QSign a new Mo. U QIdentify a National Continuous Monitoring Coordinator (NCMC) (formerly NSOC) QManage the online State Aviation Activity Questionnaire (SAAQ) QThe NCMC and other State personnel receive training on using the CMA online framework QPeriodically update their HLSC, 29 March to 1 April 2010 10

CMA Benefits QTransition from a one-time assessment activity “snap-shot” to a continuous monitoring process QProvides for collective sharing of safety data QEstablishes continuous monitoring of States’ safety oversight capabilities QAllows for identification of safety risks QShould evolve to monitor the safety performance of Member States 11 HLSC, 29 March to 1 April 2010

CMA Benefits QReal time and interactive online system (Web Supported) QLong term, cost effective, resource efficient and sustainable approach. QA layered approach will incorporate various Intervention activities, including full CSA audits and limited audits depending on the level of information made available by States. 12 HLSC, 29 March to 1 April 2010

CMA Benefits QConsistent with the policy of the Organization to pursue a proactive approach to safety under the safety management concept QPromotes and encourages the sharing of safety information by regional and international organizations. 13 HLSC, 29 March to 1 April 2010

Thank you 14 HLSC, 29 March to 1 April 2010