The seventh National Conference INCOSEIL 2013 Enterprise System

  • Slides: 16
Download presentation
The seventh National Conference INCOSE_IL 2013 Enterprise System Engineering Challenges Miri Sitton ∙ Yoram

The seventh National Conference INCOSE_IL 2013 Enterprise System Engineering Challenges Miri Sitton ∙ Yoram Reich Tel Aviv University 1 March 2013 Enterprise SE Challenges

Research Objective To define enterprise system engineering challenges and review relevant state-of-the-art research and

Research Objective To define enterprise system engineering challenges and review relevant state-of-the-art research and practice 2 March 2013 Enterprise SE Challenges

SE Definition An interdisciplinary approach and means to enable the realization of successful systems

SE Definition An interdisciplinary approach and means to enable the realization of successful systems • Focus on system • Early in the development cycle 3 March 2013 Enterprise SE Challenges

Enterprise SE Definition An interdisciplinary approach and means to enable the realization of successful

Enterprise SE Definition An interdisciplinary approach and means to enable the realization of successful enterprises • Focus on enterprise operational processes • On going – No early stage for planning – Enterprise continuity constraint 4 March 2013 Enterprise SE Challenges

Property Number of components Coordination between components 5 March 2013 SE Enterprise SE Up

Property Number of components Coordination between components 5 March 2013 SE Enterprise SE Up to tens sub- Up to hundreds systems unsynchronized & dynamic systems Planned in Enforced by advance connectivity design phase infrastructure and standards Enterprise SE Challenges

Property Operational requirements definition Design focus Operational install 6 March 2013 SE System user

Property Operational requirements definition Design focus Operational install 6 March 2013 SE System user Enterprise SE No user or responsibility System Cross-Enterprise capabilities processes System Gradual installation replacing - enterprise processes continuity Enterprise SE Challenges

General example Sensor A Sensor B System D Sensor C System X Sensor Y

General example Sensor A Sensor B System D Sensor C System X Sensor Y 7 March 2013 Enterprise SE Challenges

Transportation arena example Closed road School road Local Or …optimum Free market Vs. Global

Transportation arena example Closed road School road Local Or …optimum Free market Vs. Global failure optimum (chaos) 8 March 2013 Enterprise SE Challenges

The Challenge To establish enterprise system-engineering processes and a coordinated architecture driven from the

The Challenge To establish enterprise system-engineering processes and a coordinated architecture driven from the operational processes, to support Interoperability as part of enterprise strategy generation 9 March 2013 Enterprise SE Challenges

The HKM Framework Built-in system engineering done at project level 10 March 2013

The HKM Framework Built-in system engineering done at project level 10 March 2013

State of the Art • Product, system and SOS engineering • • • 11

State of the Art • Product, system and SOS engineering • • • 11 Built-in Business systems engineering • Enterprise Architecture • ZACHMAN Framework • TOGAF • DODAF Supply Chain Systems Engineering? March 2013 Enterprise SE Challenges

Major Gaps • Product, system and SOS engineering • • Do not support unsynchronized

Major Gaps • Product, system and SOS engineering • • Do not support unsynchronized effort Business systems engineering 12 • Very complicated to implement • Highly abstract and generic • Not driven from operational processes • No information flow presentation (only static) March 2013 Enterprise SE Challenges

Enterprise SE Foundations • Multi-disciplinary teams of operational and engineering workgroups is essential •

Enterprise SE Foundations • Multi-disciplinary teams of operational and engineering workgroups is essential • Reuse of enterprise’s assets • Operational processes continuity • SE layers: y cu r e yb Se t ri In te gr at io n t C March 2013 ito rin g Architecture M on n io at rm ty fo afe S In 13 Te s Connectivity Infrs.

Top down & Bottom up Top down (lighthouse) • • • Define operational vision

Top down & Bottom up Top down (lighthouse) • • • Define operational vision (Gradual) Define policy and holistic architecture Define compliance standard Bottom up • • • 14 COTS SYS - Of the Shelve systems Win-Win motivation (private-government) Integration compliance test March 2013 Enterprise SE Challenges

ITS Ecosystem ou Traffic Control Complexity: • Arrays of systems Public technologies (Vehicle, Roads)

ITS Ecosystem ou Traffic Control Complexity: • Arrays of systems Public technologies (Vehicle, Roads) • Different Transp. • Unmanaged development. The challenge Creating cross-organizational SE • End users diversity processes and environment to support continuous development, integration &Transp. dissemination of ITS Ministry projects within coherent Main problems: architectural design, social • Non coherent S. E. culture governmental & business policies • Multiple effort on the. Content same niche • Lack of users-value. Services activities • Unclear cut between Private & Public investments areas March 2013 15

Summary • Enterprise SE is much more complex and dynamic than SE • Main

Summary • Enterprise SE is much more complex and dynamic than SE • Main gaps in existing State-of-the-Art • Do not support unsynchronized effort • Not driven from operational processes • The emerging challenge is the need to establish enterprise system-engineering processes and a coordinated architecture driven from the operational processes 16 March 2013 Enterprise SE Challenges