Racial and ethnic disparities in childhood immunization coverage

  • Slides: 21
Download presentation
Racial and ethnic disparities in childhood immunization coverage: United States, 1998 -2003 Lawrence Barker,

Racial and ethnic disparities in childhood immunization coverage: United States, 1998 -2003 Lawrence Barker, Ph. D Philip Smith, Ph. D Kate M. Shaw, MS Susan Y. Chu, Ph. D, MSPH Qian Li, BA Jeanne M. Santoli, MD National Immunization Program Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Acknowledgements • We thank the many people who contribute to the National Immunization Survey

Acknowledgements • We thank the many people who contribute to the National Immunization Survey (NIS), the data source for these results.

Background • Institute of Medicine finding in Unequal Treatment: “Racial and ethnic disparities in

Background • Institute of Medicine finding in Unequal Treatment: “Racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare exist and … are unacceptable. ” • Childhood immunization coverage levels are at all time high levels and racial/ethnic disparities narrowed through the 90’s. • Was this narrowing continuing?

Background and Preview of Results • Racial and ethnic disparities in immunization coverage among

Background and Preview of Results • Racial and ethnic disparities in immunization coverage among preschool children are much smaller than among adults. • We will show that: Disparities in coverage exist among preschool children. • Disparity between black and white children is growing. •

National Immunization Survey (NIS) • RDD telephone survey conducted annually in 50 states and

National Immunization Survey (NIS) • RDD telephone survey conducted annually in 50 states and 28 large urban areas • Households screened for children 19 -35 mos of age • Household provides demographic data, including race/ethnicity • Household asked for permission to contact providers • Only provider-validated immunizations are used

NIS, continued • Statistical adjustments for • Non-telephone households • Provider non-response • About

NIS, continued • Statistical adjustments for • Non-telephone households • Provider non-response • About 34, 000 interviews completed annually • About 22, 000 with provider validated doses

Coverage measure • 4: 3: 1: 3: 3 coverage • 4+ DTa. P, 3+

Coverage measure • 4: 3: 1: 3: 3 coverage • 4+ DTa. P, 3+ polio, 1+ MCV, 3+ Hib, and 3+ hep. B vaccine • Universally recommended vaccines for children by 18 months of age except for newer varicella vaccine and PCV 7

Method to measure disparity trends • Examined trends in the difference in coverage between

Method to measure disparity trends • Examined trends in the difference in coverage between white and black, white and Hispanic • Used robust regression, an extension of straight line regression

Racial/ethnic disparities in coverage, 19 -35 month olds, US, 2003 • Non-Hispanic whites •

Racial/ethnic disparities in coverage, 19 -35 month olds, US, 2003 • Non-Hispanic whites • Hispanics • Non-Hispanic blacks • W/H difference: • W/B difference: 82. 5 + 1. 1 % 77. 0 + 2. 1% 73. 0 + 3. 2% 5. 5% 9. 5%

Immunization coverage, white and Hispanic children, 1998 -2003

Immunization coverage, white and Hispanic children, 1998 -2003

Difference in immunization coverage W-H children, 19982003

Difference in immunization coverage W-H children, 19982003

Widening W-B disparity in immunization coverage, 1998 -2003 Slope = 0. 86+0. 85 per

Widening W-B disparity in immunization coverage, 1998 -2003 Slope = 0. 86+0. 85 per year; p<0. 05

Reasons for the widening W-B disparity in coverage? • Preceding results are national level

Reasons for the widening W-B disparity in coverage? • Preceding results are national level and do not consider differences in SES, etc. • So we explored further by stratifying our results by income; maternal education; marital status; number of providers; type of provider; geographic region • Only difference was that widening was occurring primarily in the NE

W-B disparities in childhood immunizations by region, 2003 • W-B disparity exists in all

W-B disparities in childhood immunizations by region, 2003 • W-B disparity exists in all other regions, but the disparity is not increasing. • W-B coverage level difference in 2003: • NE 16. 8 (+8. 4) • Mid. W 14. 1 (+6. 4) • S 6. 1 (+3. 7) • W 11. 4 (+12. 8)

W-B disparity increase in the NE • Was the increasing W-B disparity related to

W-B disparity increase in the NE • Was the increasing W-B disparity related to increasing poverty? • No. • The percentage of black children living in poverty in the NE did not increase between 1998 -2003

Increasing W-B Disparity in the NE Region, 1998 -2003 • In fact, the W-B

Increasing W-B Disparity in the NE Region, 1998 -2003 • In fact, the W-B disparity was not increasing among children living below poverty • Could reflect impact of entitlement programs such as VFC • But the W-B disparity was increasing among children living at or above poverty

W-B disparity related to income differences • Disparity trend not related to poverty but

W-B disparity related to income differences • Disparity trend not related to poverty but possibly other changes in income • Between 1998 -2003 in the NE, households with incomes of $75, 000 and over increased by: • 17. 6% in white households • 0. 2% in black households • These upper income trends were not as divergent in the other 3 regions

Potential reasons • Limited minority access to primary care White children see MDs at

Potential reasons • Limited minority access to primary care White children see MDs at twice the rate of black children • Minority children more frequently seek care in ERs and hospital outpt clinics • • Differences in quality of care • Study found MDs who treat more black patients were less likely to be board certified and less connected with subspecialists

Other potential reasons • Increased guardedness among minority parents about the health care system

Other potential reasons • Increased guardedness among minority parents about the health care system • Misconceptions about risks/benefits of vaccination • NIS module found minority parents more likely to believe children become ill after vaccination • Diminished effectiveness of known interventions • For example, reminder recall effectiveness is dependent on stable provider-patient relationships

Childhood Immunization Disparities Workgroup • Formed by NIP in August 2004; Lead by Maureen

Childhood Immunization Disparities Workgroup • Formed by NIP in August 2004; Lead by Maureen Kolasa • Objective: to address racial and ethnic disparities in immunization coverage among US preschool children • Compiling existing information • Identifying data gaps • Planning future analyses, new collaborations and research projects

Conclusion The childhood immunization program is one of the great public health successes. Coverage

Conclusion The childhood immunization program is one of the great public health successes. Coverage is at all time highs, and disparities had been narrowing. This is a call to action – persistent and, in some places, growing disparities need to be addressed. If childhood immunizations are showing these trends, likely other health programs are at risk of reversing previous closing gaps.