Oregons Methane Project Experience and Potential Mike Gamroth

  • Slides: 26
Download presentation
Oregon’s Methane Project Experience and Potential Mike Gamroth Oregon State University Dept. of Animal

Oregon’s Methane Project Experience and Potential Mike Gamroth Oregon State University Dept. of Animal Sciences

The process • Anaerobic digestion – like the rumen – Longer retention • Methane

The process • Anaerobic digestion – like the rumen – Longer retention • Methane collection • Methane use – Heat, hot water – Combustion engine “Methane digester” electricity

Basic concepts • • Decomposition of organic material Oxygen-free environment Numerous strains of microorganisms

Basic concepts • • Decomposition of organic material Oxygen-free environment Numerous strains of microorganisms Biogas – Methane 50 -80% – CO 2 20 -50% – Other gases

 • Ambient temperature – Covered lagoon – Lowest output • Mesophilic – Around

• Ambient temperature – Covered lagoon – Lowest output • Mesophilic – Around 100º F – More forgiving • Thermophilic – Highest output, lower retention time

Digester types • Plug flow – Suited to scraped manure – Most common on

Digester types • Plug flow – Suited to scraped manure – Most common on dairies – Long rectangular tanks – Heat added, in-ground or insulated – Retention time (RT) 15 to 20 days

Digester types • Complete mix – Typically upright round tanks – Benefits from regular

Digester types • Complete mix – Typically upright round tanks – Benefits from regular feeding – Can handle “wetter” manure – When co-digesting, mixing important

Digester types • Covered lagoon – Lowest cost, simplest to operate – Best suited

Digester types • Covered lagoon – Lowest cost, simplest to operate – Best suited to warm climates, wet manure – Lowest gas output – Often will be “seasonal”

Digester types • Biofilm – Can augment any digester – A place for bacterial

Digester types • Biofilm – Can augment any digester – A place for bacterial activity – Reduces retention time

Economics 101 • A thrifty digester system can payback in 7 to 10 years

Economics 101 • A thrifty digester system can payback in 7 to 10 years – Initial cost – Operation costs – Value of energy, tax credits – Other benefits – odor control, solids sales

Benefits of digestion • • Generate energy from biomass Odor reduction More readily available

Benefits of digestion • • Generate energy from biomass Odor reduction More readily available nitrogen Pathogen reduction $65 $68 $80 $83

Why there aren’t more… • • • Poor design Lack of skills, time Excessive

Why there aren’t more… • • • Poor design Lack of skills, time Excessive maintenance, operation time Diminishing returns over time Lack of interest Out of business EPA and Meyer, et al

Keys to success • Know your manure quality • Match the digester technology with

Keys to success • Know your manure quality • Match the digester technology with the manure • Select a tested design and keep it simple • Take advantage of incentives • Monitor the system daily • Line up operation and maintenance backup

Resources • http: //www. epa. gov/agstar/index. html • Our project: – Energy Trust of

Resources • http: //www. epa. gov/agstar/index. html • Our project: – Energy Trust of Oregon – Oregon Beef Council – Oregon Dairy Farmers Association • Amanda Green (360) 751 -4190

A partnership of Cal-gon Farms and Portland General Electric

A partnership of Cal-gon Farms and Portland General Electric

The system • Scraped manure • Piston pump to feed digester • Digester effluent

The system • Scraped manure • Piston pump to feed digester • Digester effluent through a screwpress screen • Liquids stored in lagoon • Solids in covered bunker

Uses • Lagoon liquids mixed with water and irrigated onto field corn • Solids

Uses • Lagoon liquids mixed with water and irrigated onto field corn • Solids are sold off the farm and used as bedding • Recycling lagoon liquids through separator when not used for digester

Research project • Questions about the farm’s nutrient balance • Questions about the start-up

Research project • Questions about the farm’s nutrient balance • Questions about the start-up and stabilization of the digester • Received money from a grant program to sample the digester during start-up and for a two month period during operation • Evaluate solids as a soil amendment

Electrical Output Cal-Gon Farms Biogas Project Generation Record (based on PGE bills) Ending Svc

Electrical Output Cal-Gon Farms Biogas Project Generation Record (based on PGE bills) Ending Svc Date k. Wh # Days Avg k. Wh/day 5/30/2002 8527 31 275 7/30/2002 12301 32 384 8/29/2002 14817 30 494 9/28/2002 17886 30 596 10/29/2002 23115 31 746 11/27/2002 19614 29 676 8/3/2003 271677 336 660

Basic results Lb. / 1000 gallons CFU/100 ml E. coli DM % N P

Basic results Lb. / 1000 gallons CFU/100 ml E. coli DM % N P K Raw manure 13. 0 43 6 26 59 mill. Digester effluent 4. 6 27 4 19 1. 2 mill. 26. 4 6. 3/t 2. 4/t 3. 7/t Solids

Exporting solids to reduce nutrient loading Lb. /cow-year (3. 5 ton/cow) N P K

Exporting solids to reduce nutrient loading Lb. /cow-year (3. 5 ton/cow) N P K Avg. separated solids 1 17. 1 3. 0 6. 5 Bernie’s separated solids 22. 4 8. 4 13 Bernie’s lagoon solids 31. 1 14. 6 9. 4 1 Average of 51 separators, Willamette Valley, 1995

Solids plots

Solids plots

DAF separation TS Raw 1. 9 Sludge 3. 3 Effluent 0. 4 90%+ P

DAF separation TS Raw 1. 9 Sludge 3. 3 Effluent 0. 4 90%+ P removal TSS 0. 05