MISCELLANY Xiaoyang Zhuang Economics 201 FS Duke University

  • Slides: 15
Download presentation
MISCELLANY Xiaoyang Zhuang Economics 201 FS Duke University March 16, 2010

MISCELLANY Xiaoyang Zhuang Economics 201 FS Duke University March 16, 2010

Price Series ONE-MINUTE PRICE DATA Alcoa. Du. Pont. The world’s leading producer of aluminum.

Price Series ONE-MINUTE PRICE DATA Alcoa. Du. Pont. The world’s leading producer of aluminum. A diversified scientific company. April 9, 1997 – December 30, 2010 3404 data points Aligned

Returns Series * ^ FIVE-MINUTE RETURNS DATA (OVERNIGHT RETURNS EXCLUDED) Alcoa. (*) October 10,

Returns Series * ^ FIVE-MINUTE RETURNS DATA (OVERNIGHT RETURNS EXCLUDED) Alcoa. (*) October 10, 2008, 9: 40 - 9: 50: Standard & Poor’s revised the firm’s outlook from “stable” to “negative” after markets closed on October 9. [$11. 76 11. 82 12. 43 12. 54 13. 09 $13. 00 12. 53 12. 40 12. 29 12. 25 $12. 04] Du. Pont. (^)May 6, 2010, 14: 40 – 14: 50: Flash crash. [$36. 60 $34. 10 $35. 44]

Contents 1. Separating Market Microstructure Noise from the Price Process 2. Using Overnight Returns

Contents 1. Separating Market Microstructure Noise from the Price Process 2. Using Overnight Returns to Predict (Next-Day) Price Reversal

Contents 1. Separating Market Microstructure Noise from the Price Process 2. Using Overnight Returns

Contents 1. Separating Market Microstructure Noise from the Price Process 2. Using Overnight Returns to Predict (Next-Day) Price Reversal

Volatility Series ANNUALIZED, DAILY, ONE- AND FIVE-MINUTE REALIZED VOLATILITY DATA where t the day

Volatility Series ANNUALIZED, DAILY, ONE- AND FIVE-MINUTE REALIZED VOLATILITY DATA where t the day index, M is the number of intervals per day, and ∆ is the sampling interval size.

Market Microstructure Noise MOTIVATING QUESTION Given one-minute stock price data, is it possible to

Market Microstructure Noise MOTIVATING QUESTION Given one-minute stock price data, is it possible to disentangle actual volatility from market microstructure noise? THE IDEA • (*) The difference between realized volatilities calculated using x- and y-minute (x < y) returns data should be due to finite sample considerations and microstructure noise: where RVolt, x-minute is the realized volatility on day t calculated using x-minute returns data; A is the difference due to finite sample considerations; and εmicrostructure is the difference due to microstructure noise. • The Percent of RVolt, xmin Not Accounted for by RVolt, (x+6)min seems to stabilize when x ≥ ~6 (as we will see). • Could the stabilized value serve as an estimator of finite sample considerations as the sampling frequency changes?

(RVolt, 1 min - RVolt, 6 min)/ (RVolt, 1 min) Percent of RVolt, 1

(RVolt, 1 min - RVolt, 6 min)/ (RVolt, 1 min) Percent of RVolt, 1 min Not Accounted for by RVolt, 6 min SAMPLE STATISTICS: AA mean(Percent) = 6. 30 median(Percent) = 6. 95 std(Percent) = 13. 12 range(Percent) = [-57. 40 50. 55] SAMPLE STATISTICS: DD mean(Percent) = 8. 00 median(Percent) = 8. 24 std(Percent) = 13. 73 range(Percent) = [-50. 40 78. 56]

(RVolt, 6 min - RVolt, 11 min)/ (RVolt, 6 min) Percent of RVolt, 6

(RVolt, 6 min - RVolt, 11 min)/ (RVolt, 6 min) Percent of RVolt, 6 min Not Accounted for by RVolt, 11 min SAMPLE STATISTICS: AA mean(Percent) = 2. 59 median(Percent) = 2. 68 std(Percent) = 12. 55 range(Percent) = [-62. 97 52. 65] SAMPLE STATISTICS: DD mean(Percent) = 3. 62 median(Percent) = 3. 55 std(Percent) = 12. 56 range(Percent) = [-51. 31 45. 26]

(RVolt, 11 min - RVolt, 16 min)/ (RVolt, 11 min) Percent of RVolt, 11

(RVolt, 11 min - RVolt, 16 min)/ (RVolt, 11 min) Percent of RVolt, 11 min Not Accounted for by RVolt, 16 min SAMPLE STATISTICS: AA mean(Percent) = -0. 79 median(Percent) = -0. 45 std(Percent) = 14. 76 range(Percent) = [-56. 30 53. 01] SAMPLE STATISTICS: DD mean(Percent) = -0. 28 median(Percent) = 0. 22 std(Percent) = 14. 82 range(Percent) = [-85. 91 59. 17]

(RVolt, 16 min - RVolt, 21 min)/ (RVolt, 16 min) Percent of RVolt, 16

(RVolt, 16 min - RVolt, 21 min)/ (RVolt, 16 min) Percent of RVolt, 16 min Not Accounted for by RVolt, 21 min SAMPLE STATISTICS: AA mean(Percent) = 0. 82 median(Percent) = 1. 16 std(Percent) = 16. 03 range(Percent) = [-71. 70 57. 39] SAMPLE STATISTICS: DD mean(Percent) = 1. 16 median(Percent) = 1. 79 std(Percent) = 16. 15 range(Percent) = [-78. 41 49. 66]

Can the mean of stable Percent values (i. e. x ≥ ~6) serve as

Can the mean of stable Percent values (i. e. x ≥ ~6) serve as an estimator of finite sample considerations?

Contents 1. Separating Market Microstructure Noise from the Price Process 2. Using Overnight Returns

Contents 1. Separating Market Microstructure Noise from the Price Process 2. Using Overnight Returns to Predict (Next-Day) Price Reversal

Overnight Returns and (Next-Day) Price Reversal MOTIVATING QUESTION Given that a stock loses value

Overnight Returns and (Next-Day) Price Reversal MOTIVATING QUESTION Given that a stock loses value in afterhours trading, how will the stock perform in the first 15 minutes after the market opens the following morning? PROCEDURE Define t as the day index. 1. For each stock, consider every case in which the overnight return is negative: i. e. [pricet, 15: 59 pricet+1, 9: 35] = [x y], where x > y 2. Compute a = max([pricet+1, 9: 36 pricet+1, 9: 37 . . . pricet+1, 9: 50]). 3. Plot each (negative) overnight return against its corresponding Price Reversal, where Price Reversal = log(a) – log(pricet+1, 9: 35)

Overnight Returns and (Next-Day) Price Reversal SAMPLE STATISTICS: AA mean(Reversal) = 0. 4281% median(Reversal)

Overnight Returns and (Next-Day) Price Reversal SAMPLE STATISTICS: AA mean(Reversal) = 0. 4281% median(Reversal) = 0. 2552% % of Reversal data points exceeding 0: 74. 8 SAMPLE STATISTICS: DD mean(Reversal) = 0. 3441% median(Reversal) = 0. 2309% % of Reversal data points exceeding 0: 77. 0