IA330US65IA117 IA330F17 Jasper County Intersections Discussion of Design

IA-330/US-65/IA-117 & IA-330/F-17 Jasper County Intersections Discussion of Design Alternatives April 7, 2009 Presented by: Tom Welch State Transportation Safety Engineer Prepared with the Assistance of: Dr. Tom Maze & Joshua Hochstein – Iowa State University’s Center for Transportation Research and Education (CTRE) administers the following programs: Bridge Engineering Center • Center for Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Technology • Construction Management & Technology • Iowa Local Technical Assistance Program • Iowa Statewide Urban Design and Specifications • Iowa Traffic Safety Data Service • Midwest Transportation Consortium • Partnership for Geotechnical Advancement • Roadway Infrastructure Management Systems

DEFINING THE PROBLEM With Traditional Expressway Intersection Design • Typical Problem: Far-Side Right-Angle Collisions

DEFINING THE PROBLEM With Traditional Expressway Intersection Design Typical Far -Side Right -Angle Collision * Courtesy of University of Minnesota Intersection Surveillance System Test Bed at US-52 & CSAH-9, Goodhue County, MN 6: 42 AM CDT

U IA S-6 -3 5 30 IA-117 30 -3 IA US-65 F-17 Locations: IA-330 at County Road F-17 & IA-330/US-65/IA-117 Jasper County

IA-330 and Co Rd F-17 Fatalities: Opal Kassel* 79 Nevada, Iowa Brian Cole 47 Indianola, Iowa Walter Donahue 78 Kamrar, Iowa Dorothy Donahue 73 Kamrar, Iowa Craig Hudson 16 Collins, Iowa Major Injuries: * Driver was former DOT Director

CRASH TYPES: IA-330 & F-17 Far-Side Right-Angle Crashes ARE a Problem! 73% of Right-Angle are “Far-Side” at IA-330 & F-17

CRASH SEVERITY: IA-330 & F-17 Maze et al. , 2004 [page 79] More Fatal & Major Injury Crashes Occur at -330 & F-17 Than on Average IA

MINOR ROAD DRIVER AGE IN RIGHT-ANGLE CRASHES AT IA-330 & F-17 Elderly Drivers More Involved in these Collisions

Highway Crashes are Complex u Driver conditions and behavior § A contributing factor in 95 percent of crashes § Primary factor in 67 percent of crashes u Roadway design and environment § A contributing factor in 28 percent of crashes § Primary factor in 4 percent of crashes u Vehicle § A contributing factor in 8 percent of crashes § Primary factor in 4 percent of crashes

YOUNG & ELDERLY DRIVERS Vision and Cognition Challenges Peripheral Vision is important to making judgements about placement, speed, and gaps in moving traffic – Young drivers are still developing peripheral vision – Along with other vision changes, older drivers also begin to lose peripheral vision

The Teen Brain Is Still Under Construction • Recent Scientific studies reveal that the teen brain is still under construction until about age 25. • The Prefrontal Cortex is the last part to develop. It also controls: – – – risk-taking judgment impulse control speed assessment distance assessment ability to handle distractions

Medical Factors - Aging Drivers Eye Lens • The lens of the eye becomes cloudy and yellow with age, giving faulty information for driving decisions. Depth Perception • With age, people lose depth perception and peripheral vision making it harder to judge distance and speed Needed Light • A 50 -year-old needs 5 times more light to read than a 20 • year old. At 60 he’ll need 10 times more light

ALTERNATIVES:

SIGNALIZATION 1) Creates Expressway Traffic Delay 2) Not Expected by Expressway Drivers 3) Don’t Necessarily Improve Safety (Change Crash Types, Not Severity) 4) Signals at the bottom of a hill are not desirable

INCREASED ENFORCEMENT: “It is generally considered that fear of arrest and punishment causes drivers to conform better to traffic laws and regulations and thus reduces accidents. On the other hand, there is evidence to suggest that enforcement crusades have little lasting effect. For example, in several experiments vehicle speeds and driver behavior were recorded before and after an intensive enforcement effort. No significant changes were found either in speeds or in the number of law violations. Other studies have shown that many drivers ignore speed limit and speed zone signs that do not conform with their usual driving habits. ” Dr. Clarkson H. Oglesby Stanford University

Jasper Co. Sherriff Department Comments

Failure To Yield Right-of-Way Crashes 2004 -2008 5 -year average per/year Vehicle Type that got pulled in front of 8 ft 16 ft 17 ft Average annual crashes reported 149 4742 Motorcycle Passenger car 815 Sport utility vehicle 738 Van or mini-van 18 ft 66 ft 1224 Pickup, van, small bus 269 Large Trucks This depicts crashes involving a causal driver who failed to yield the right-of-way to another vehicle at an intersection

Diamond Interchange Cost Estimate: ≈ $7 -10 Million Safety Effectiveness Estimate: ≈ 60 – 80%

THE J-TURN INTERSECTION Out-of-the-way travel distance depends on spacing of Uturns, but 1500 to 5000 feet extra travel can be expected for a J-Turn Intersection. However, because the movements involved are less complex, the total delay time for indirect left-turn & crossing maneuvers may be equivalent to that of direct maneuvers at a traditional at-grade intersection.

THE J-TURN INTERSECTION The J-Turn Intersection reduces the total number of intersection conflict points from 42 to 24, reduces the crossing conflicts from 24 to 4, and spreads out the conflict points over a larger area.

J-TURN INTERSECTION SIGNAGE EXAMPLE

J-TURN ALTERNATIVE -330/F-17) (IA Approximate Proposed U-Turn Spacing From Main Intersection: ≈ 900 feet ≈ 1600 feet

THE J-TURN INTERSECTION J-Turn Intersection at IA-330 & F-17 could… Prevent 100% of the collisions which occurred there over the last 6 years.