HISTORICAL THINKING SKILLS AP World History AP History

  • Slides: 15
Download presentation
HISTORICAL THINKING SKILLS AP World History

HISTORICAL THINKING SKILLS AP World History

 • AP History classes encourage students to become “apprentice historians” • To achieve

• AP History classes encourage students to become “apprentice historians” • To achieve this students must begin thinking like a historian • There are 4 types of HTSs for APWH • • Chronological Reasoning Comparison and Contextualization Crafting Historical Arguments from Historical Evidence Historical Interpretation and Synthesis • EVERY question on the AP Exam will require students to apply one or more HTS.

SKILL TYPE 1: CHRONOLOGICAL REASONING • Three parts • Historical Causation • Patterns of

SKILL TYPE 1: CHRONOLOGICAL REASONING • Three parts • Historical Causation • Patterns of Continuity and Change Over Time • Periodization • Think TIME LINES

HISTORICAL CAUSATION • Identify, analyze, and evaluate the relationship between events and developments •

HISTORICAL CAUSATION • Identify, analyze, and evaluate the relationship between events and developments • Explain short-term and long-term causes and short-term and long-term effects • Analyze and evaluate the interaction of several causes and effects • Is there a correlation between these events? • Is this a coincidence? • Think: How do events of the past impact things today? How will events today impact tomorrow?

PATTERNS OF CONTINUITY AND CHANGE OVER TIME • Involves the ability to recognize, analyze,

PATTERNS OF CONTINUITY AND CHANGE OVER TIME • Involves the ability to recognize, analyze, and evaluate the dynamics of history over periods of time • Explain how historical patterns and trends over time relate to larger historical processes or themes

PERIODIZATION • The ability to analyze and organize history into blocks of time •

PERIODIZATION • The ability to analyze and organize history into blocks of time • Key dates to mark beginning and ending of a period of time • Analyze different and/or competing models of periodization in history

SKILL TYPE 2: COMPARISON AND CONTEXTUALIZATION • Involves the ability to compare and contrast

SKILL TYPE 2: COMPARISON AND CONTEXTUALIZATION • Involves the ability to compare and contrast historical events and connect them to particular circumstances • 2 Sub-skills • Comparison • contextualization

COMPARISON • The ability to describe, compare, contrast, and evaluate two or more historical

COMPARISON • The ability to describe, compare, contrast, and evaluate two or more historical events/developments • The ability to identify, compare, contrast, and evaluate a given historical event/development form multiple perspectives

CONTEXTUALIZATION • The ability to see how a specific event or development falls into

CONTEXTUALIZATION • The ability to see how a specific event or development falls into the larger and broader developments on a global level • The ability to explain and evaluate ways in which a phenomenon, event, or process connects to other similar historical phenomena across time and place.

SKILL TYPE 3: CRAFTING HISTORICAL ARGUMENTS FROM HISTORICAL EVIDENCE • Two components • Historical

SKILL TYPE 3: CRAFTING HISTORICAL ARGUMENTS FROM HISTORICAL EVIDENCE • Two components • Historical Argumentation • Appropriate use of Relevant Historical Evidence

HISTORICAL ARGUMENTATION • The ability to analyze commonly accepted historical arguments and explain how

HISTORICAL ARGUMENTATION • The ability to analyze commonly accepted historical arguments and explain how an argument has been constructed from historical evidence. • The ability to construct convincing interpretations through analysis of disparate, relevant historical evidence. • The ability to evaluate and synthesize conflicting historical evidence to construct persuasive historical arguments.

APPROPRIATE USE OF RELEVANT HISTORICAL EVIDENCE • The ability to evaluate evidence obtained from

APPROPRIATE USE OF RELEVANT HISTORICAL EVIDENCE • The ability to evaluate evidence obtained from diverse sources including: • • • Written primary and secondary sources Art and illsustrations Artifacts Maps Statistical data • The ability to analyze features of historical evidence such as audience, purpose, point of view (perspective), format, argument, limitations, and context relevant to the evidence considered. • The ability to make supportable inferences and draw appropriate conclusions based on analysis and evaluation of historical evidence

 • Two components • Interpretation • Synthesis SKILL TYPE 4: HISTORICAL INTERPRETATION AND

• Two components • Interpretation • Synthesis SKILL TYPE 4: HISTORICAL INTERPRETATION AND SYNTHESIS

INTERPRETATION • The ability to describe, analyze, evaluate, and construct diverse interpretations of the

INTERPRETATION • The ability to describe, analyze, evaluate, and construct diverse interpretations of the past and to determine the context and points of view of primary and secondary sources, historical arguments, and divergent perspectives. • The ability to understand how particular circumstances and context shape historian’s interpretations of past events. • The ability to understand that models of historical interpretation have changed over time.

SYNTHESIS • The ability to apply all of the other HTS, as well as

SYNTHESIS • The ability to apply all of the other HTS, as well as drawing from and fusing knowledge and methods from diverse sources in order to build new and persuasive understandings of the past. • The ability to make connections to events crossing over time periods, disciplines, themes, and/or geography