FATF Evaluation 2016 May 4 th Forum Maria

  • Slides: 10
Download presentation
FATF Evaluation 2016 May 4 th Forum Maria Nilson Ministry of Culture Unit for

FATF Evaluation 2016 May 4 th Forum Maria Nilson Ministry of Culture Unit for Democracy and Civil Society Finansdepartementet

Financial Action Task Force APG MONEY VAL MENAFATF CFATF 36 members and 8 regional

Financial Action Task Force APG MONEY VAL MENAFATF CFATF 36 members and 8 regional organisms ESAAM LG GIABA GAFISUD Finansdepartementet EAG

FATF – organisation Plenary Secretariat Steeringgroup ECG PDG RTMG ICRG (Evaluation and Compliance Group)

FATF – organisation Plenary Secretariat Steeringgroup ECG PDG RTMG ICRG (Evaluation and Compliance Group) (Policy Development Group) (Risks, Trends and Methods Group) (International Cooperation against Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing) Finansdepartementet

Evaluation according to FATF Pre onsite ”paperwork” (technical compliance) Secretariat 6 months before onsite

Evaluation according to FATF Pre onsite ”paperwork” (technical compliance) Secretariat 6 months before onsite Onsite (efficiency) Evaluationteam approx 10 p Approx 2 weeks Post onsite Drafts plenary-discussions Gradings Acceptance and publishing of report Finansdepartementet Post Plenary Follow-up

Evaluation in two parts Technical Compliance Efficiency Finansdepartementet • Recommendations and IN • National

Evaluation in two parts Technical Compliance Efficiency Finansdepartementet • Recommendations and IN • National rules and regulations • National Authorities and their operative space • 11 outcomes • The system in practice • Prove efficiency – process and results

Gradings Technical Compliance - four steps Noncompliant Partially compliant Largely compliant Compliant or Efficiency

Gradings Technical Compliance - four steps Noncompliant Partially compliant Largely compliant Compliant or Efficiency – four levels Low Moderate Eight or more NC/PC or if several of rec 3, 5, 10, 11 or 20 get NC/PC Substantial High Seven or more outcomes are ”low” or ”moderate” or if there are four ”lows” Enhanced Follow-up Finansdepartementet

Efficiency • • New method 3 levels/general goals 11 outcomes Evaluation of to what

Efficiency • • New method 3 levels/general goals 11 outcomes Evaluation of to what degree outcomes are met Operational target Processes, routines Statistics – cases and best practice Finansdepartementet

Efficiency – approach Step 1: Answer to core issues, description of how practice meets

Efficiency – approach Step 1: Answer to core issues, description of how practice meets criteria Step 2: Evaluate to what extent National Authorities meet characteristics significant for an effective system Finansdepartementet

Follow-up ahead of us Finansdepartementet

Follow-up ahead of us Finansdepartementet

Government Offices Styrgrupp Projektgrupp projektledare Verksamhetsutövare Råd (referensgrupp) Kontaktpersoner departement och myndigheter UD/NIS U/RS

Government Offices Styrgrupp Projektgrupp projektledare Verksamhetsutövare Råd (referensgrupp) Kontaktpersoner departement och myndigheter UD/NIS U/RS + UD/S P U/UC Fi/FMA N/ENT Fi/KSÄ Fi/S 3 S/SFÖ - --Li. Fi - BV SKV/TV LS*3 Finansdepartementet Ju/PO RPS Ju/Å EBM/ÅM Övr. Ju-dep (L 1, L 2, L 5, L 6, BIRS, KRIM och EU) Ju/KO FMI Ju/DOM RN/Sv. Adv