Elasticity and Dynamics of LC Elastomers Leo Radzihovsky

  • Slides: 33
Download presentation
Elasticity and Dynamics of LC Elastomers Leo Radzihovsky Xiangjing Xing Ranjan Mukhopadhyay Olaf Stenull

Elasticity and Dynamics of LC Elastomers Leo Radzihovsky Xiangjing Xing Ranjan Mukhopadhyay Olaf Stenull 5/23/05 IMA

Outline • Review of Elasticity of Nematic Elastomers – Soft and Semi-Soft Strain-only theories

Outline • Review of Elasticity of Nematic Elastomers – Soft and Semi-Soft Strain-only theories – Coupling to the director • Phenomenological Dynamics – Hydrodynamic – Non-hydrodynamic • Phenomenological Dynamics of NE – Soft hydrodynamic – Semi-soft with non-hydro modes 5/23/05 IMA

Strain Displacements Cauchy Deformation. Tensor (A “tangent plane” vector) Displacement a, b = Ref.

Strain Displacements Cauchy Deformation. Tensor (A “tangent plane” vector) Displacement a, b = Ref. Space strain i, j = Target space Invariances TCL, Mukhopadhyay, Radzihovsky, Xing, Phys. Rev. E 66, 011702/1 -22(2002) 5/23/05 IMA

Isotropic and Uniaxial Solid Isotropic: free energy density f has two harmonic elastic constants

Isotropic and Uniaxial Solid Isotropic: free energy density f has two harmonic elastic constants Uniaxial: five harmonic elastic constants Nematic elastomer: uniaxial. Is this enough? 5/23/05 IMA

Nonlinear strain Green – Saint Venant strain tensor- Physicists’ favorite – invariant under U;

Nonlinear strain Green – Saint Venant strain tensor- Physicists’ favorite – invariant under U; u is a tensor is the reference space, and a scalar in the target space 5/23/05 IMA

Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking Phase transition to anisotropic state as m goes to zero Direction

Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking Phase transition to anisotropic state as m goes to zero Direction of n 0 is arbitrary Symmetric. Traceless Golubovic, L. , and Lubensky, T. C. , , PRL part 63, 1082 -1085, (1989). 5/23/05 IMA

Strain of New Phase u’ is the strain relative to the new state at

Strain of New Phase u’ is the strain relative to the new state at points x’ du is the deviation of the strain relative to the original reference frame R from u 0 du is linearly proportional to u’ 5/23/05 IMA

Elasticity of New Phase Rotation of anisotropy direction costs no energy C 5=0 because

Elasticity of New Phase Rotation of anisotropy direction costs no energy C 5=0 because of rotational invariance This 2 nd order expansion is invariant under all U but only infinitesimal V 5/23/05 IMA

Soft Extensional Elasticity Strain uxx can be converted to a zero energy rotation by

Soft Extensional Elasticity Strain uxx can be converted to a zero energy rotation by developing strains uzz and uxz until uxx =(r-1)/2 5/23/05 IMA

Frozen anisotropy: Semi-soft System is now uniaxial – why not simply use uniaxial elastic

Frozen anisotropy: Semi-soft System is now uniaxial – why not simply use uniaxial elastic energy? This predicts linear stress-stain curve and misses lowering of energy by reorientation: Model Uniaxial system: Produces harmonic uniaxial energy for small strain but has nonlinear terms – reduces to isotropic when h=0 Rotation 5/23/05 IMA f (u) : isotropic

Semi-soft stress-strain Ward Identity Second Piola-Kirchoff stress tensor; not the same as the familiar

Semi-soft stress-strain Ward Identity Second Piola-Kirchoff stress tensor; not the same as the familiar Cauchy stress tensor Ranjan Mukhopadhyay and TCL: in preparation 5/23/05 IMA

Semi-soft Extensions Break rotational symmetry Stripes form in real systems: semi-soft, BC Not perfectly

Semi-soft Extensions Break rotational symmetry Stripes form in real systems: semi-soft, BC Not perfectly soft because of residual anisotropy arising from crosslinking in the nematic phase - semi-soft. length of plateau depends on magnitude of spontaneous anisotropy r. Warner-Terentjev Note: Semi-softness only visible in nonlinear Finkelmann, et al. , J. Phys. II 7, 1059 (1997); properties Warner, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 47, 1355 (1999) 5/23/05 IMA

Soft Biaxial Sm. A and Sm. C Free energy density for a uniaxial solid

Soft Biaxial Sm. A and Sm. C Free energy density for a uniaxial solid (Sm. A with locked layers) Red: Corrections for transition to biaxial Sm. A Green: Corrections for trtansition to Sm. C C 4=0: Transition to Biaxial Smectic with soft in-plane elasticity C 5=0: Transition to Sm. C with a complicated soft elasticity Olaf Stenull, TCL, PRL 94, 081304 (2005) 5/23/05 IMA

Coupling to Nematic Order • Strain uab transforms like a tensor in the ref.

Coupling to Nematic Order • Strain uab transforms like a tensor in the ref. space but as a scalar in the target space. • The director ni and the nematic order parameter Qij transform as scalars in the ref. space but , respectively, as a vector and a tensor in the target space. • How can they be coupled? – Transform between spaces using the Polar Decomposition Theorem. Ref->target 5/23/05 Target->ref IMA

Strain and Rotation Symmetric shear 5/23/05 Simple Shear IMA Rotation

Strain and Rotation Symmetric shear 5/23/05 Simple Shear IMA Rotation

Softness with Director Na= unit vector along uniaxial direction in reference space; layer normal

Softness with Director Na= unit vector along uniaxial direction in reference space; layer normal in a locked Sm. A phase Red: Sm. A-Sm. C transition Director relaxes to zero 5/23/05 IMA

Harmonic Free energy with Frank part 5/23/05 IMA

Harmonic Free energy with Frank part 5/23/05 IMA

NE: Relaxed elastic energy Uniaxial solid when C 5 R>0, including Frank director energy

NE: Relaxed elastic energy Uniaxial solid when C 5 R>0, including Frank director energy 5/23/05 IMA

Slow Dynamics – General Approach • Identify slow variables: Determine static thermodynamics: F( )

Slow Dynamics – General Approach • Identify slow variables: Determine static thermodynamics: F( ) • Develop dynamics: Poisson-brackets plus dissipation • Mode Counting (Martin, Pershan, Parodi 72): – One hydrodynamic mode for each conserved or broken-symmetry variable – Extra Modes for slow non-hydrodynamic – Friction and constraints may reduce number of hydrodynamics variables 5/23/05 IMA

Preliminaries Harmonic Oscillator: seeds of complete formalism Poisson bracket friction Poisson brackets: mechanical coupling

Preliminaries Harmonic Oscillator: seeds of complete formalism Poisson bracket friction Poisson brackets: mechanical coupling between variables – time-reversal invariant. Dissipative couplings: not time-reversal invariant Dissipative: time derivative of field (p) to its conjugate field (v) 5/23/05 IMA

Fluid Flow – Navier Stokes Conserved densities: mass: r Energy: e Momentum: gi =

Fluid Flow – Navier Stokes Conserved densities: mass: r Energy: e Momentum: gi = rvi 5/23/05 IMA

Crystalline Solid I Mass density is periodic Conserved densities: mass: e r Broken-symmetry field:

Crystalline Solid I Mass density is periodic Conserved densities: mass: e r Broken-symmetry field: Energy: Phase of mass-density field: u describes displacement of periodic part of density Momentum: gi = rvi Aside: Nonlinear strain is not the Green Saint-Venant tensor Strain Free energy 5/23/05 IMA

Crystalline Solid II Modes: Transverse phonon: permeation 4 Long. Phonon: 2 Permeation (vacancy diffusion):

Crystalline Solid II Modes: Transverse phonon: permeation 4 Long. Phonon: 2 Permeation (vacancy diffusion): 1 Thermal Diffusion: 1 Aside: full nonlinear theory requires more care Permeation: independent motion of mass-density wave and mass: mass motion with static density wave 5/23/05 IMA

Tethered Solid 7 hydrodynamic variables: 1 density, 3 momenta, 3 displacements, 1 energy +

Tethered Solid 7 hydrodynamic variables: 1 density, 3 momenta, 3 displacements, 1 energy + 1 constraint = 8 -1=7 Classic equations of motion for a Lagrangian solid; use Cauchy-Saint-Venant Strain Isotropic elastic free energy + energy mode (1) 5/23/05 IMA

Gel: Tethered Solid in a Fluid Tethered solid Friction only for relative motion. Galilean

Gel: Tethered Solid in a Fluid Tethered solid Friction only for relative motion. Galilean invariance Fluid Total momentum conserved Frictional Coupling Fast non-hydro mode: but not valid if there are time scales in G Fluid and Solid move together 5/23/05 IMA

Nematic Hydrodynamics: Harvard I g is the total momentum density: determines angular momentum Frank

Nematic Hydrodynamics: Harvard I g is the total momentum density: determines angular momentum Frank free energy for a nematic 5/23/05 IMA

Nematic Hydrodynamics: Harvard II permeation w – fluid vorticity not spin frequency of rods

Nematic Hydrodynamics: Harvard II permeation w – fluid vorticity not spin frequency of rods Symmetric strain rate rotates n Stress tensor can be made symmetric 5/23/05 IMA Modes: 2 long sound, 2 “slow” director diffusion. 2 “fast” velocity diff.

NE: Director-displacement dynamics Stenull, TCL, PRE 65, 058091 (2004) Tethered anisotropic solid Note: all

NE: Director-displacement dynamics Stenull, TCL, PRE 65, 058091 (2004) Tethered anisotropic solid Note: all variables in plus nematic target space Semi-soft: Hydrodynamic modes same as a uniaxial solid: 3 pairs of sound modes 5/23/05 IMA Director relaxes in a microscopic time to the local shear – nonhydrodynamic mode Modifications if g depends on frequency

Soft Elastomer Hydrodynamics Same mode structure as a discotic liquid crystal: 2 “longitudinal” sound,

Soft Elastomer Hydrodynamics Same mode structure as a discotic liquid crystal: 2 “longitudinal” sound, 2 columnar modes with zero velocity along n, 2 smectic modes with zero velocity along both symmetry directions Slow and fast diffusive modes along symmetry directions 5/23/05 IMA

Beyond Hydrodynamics: ‘Rouse’ Modes Standard hydrodynamics for wt. E<<1; nonanalytic wt. E>>1 5/23/05 IMA

Beyond Hydrodynamics: ‘Rouse’ Modes Standard hydrodynamics for wt. E<<1; nonanalytic wt. E>>1 5/23/05 IMA

Rouse in NEs References: Martinoty, Pleiner, et al. ; Stenull & TL; Warner &

Rouse in NEs References: Martinoty, Pleiner, et al. ; Stenull & TL; Warner & Terentjev, EPJ 14, (2005) Second plateau in G' “Rouse” Behavior before plateau 5/23/05 IMA

Rheology Conclusion: Linear rheology is not a good probe of semisoftness 5/23/05 IMA

Rheology Conclusion: Linear rheology is not a good probe of semisoftness 5/23/05 IMA

Summary and Prospectives • Ideal nematic elastomers can exhibit soft elasticity. • Semi-soft elasticity

Summary and Prospectives • Ideal nematic elastomers can exhibit soft elasticity. • Semi-soft elasticity is manifested in nonlinear phenomena. • Linearized hydrodynamics of soft NE is same as that of columnar phase, that of a semi-soft NE is the same as that of a uniaxial solid. • At high frequencies, NE’s will exhibit polymer modes; semisoft can exhibit plateaus for appropriate relaxation times. • Randomness will affect analysis: random transverse stress, random elastic constants will complicate damping and highfrequency behavior. 5/23/05 IMA