AAE 450 Propulsion LV Stephen Hanna Critical Design

  • Slides: 12
Download presentation
AAE 450 - Propulsion LV Stephen Hanna Critical Design Review 02/27/01

AAE 450 - Propulsion LV Stephen Hanna Critical Design Review 02/27/01

Launch Vehicle (Stephen Hanna) q Energia 15. 24 m Max § Total Payload to

Launch Vehicle (Stephen Hanna) q Energia 15. 24 m Max § Total Payload to LEO ~179 Tonnes § $1. 2 billion – $2. 8 billion per launch (2000 dollars) 30. 48 m 24. 00 m NTR {~8 m} 54. 864 m 3. 9 m 7. 985 m D q All facilities Exist q Available for licensed production overseas

LV Flight Sequence q Flight Time (Min: Sec) q Disposal Area § 1) Liftoff

LV Flight Sequence q Flight Time (Min: Sec) q Disposal Area § 1) Liftoff 00: 00 § 2) Booster Staging 2: 20 § 3) Core Separation 6: 30 y b Effective Atmosphere 3 (Stephen Hanna) § Side Boosters • Side Booster from launch site 400 Km • At altitude of 80 km § Core • Core from Launch Site 19200 Km • At altitude of 110 Km 2 1 Earth

LV Reliability (Stephen Hanna) q Reliability is important as ~90% of all sever emergencies

LV Reliability (Stephen Hanna) q Reliability is important as ~90% of all sever emergencies in space occurring during launch. q Reliability by component § Booster- similar to zenith first stage • One booster failure is acceptable o 87. 5% reliability needed • 96% success rate using Zenith first stage record § Main Core- 3 engines • 2 engines needed for LEO insertion o 66% reliability needed o No success rate that is practical q Overall Reliability § 87. 5% Reliability needed for successful mission based on booster § 96% Success rate based on booster q Therefore Zero Abort is needed to improve overall success rate

Considered Launch Failures q Destruction of launcher caused by (28. 3%)* § Boost explosion

Considered Launch Failures q Destruction of launcher caused by (28. 3%)* § Boost explosion § Structural failure § Any of the following causes q Ignition failure (25. 7%)* q Loss of Thrust or Insufficient Thrust – depending where in mission profile demes if it is critical( 15. 9%)* q Loss of Attitude (13. 2%)* § Guidance failure § Loss of control q Stage separation failure and other (10. 6%)* *Launch failures of unmanned launchers Launch Risk** Coverage of the Mission*** q On- The- Pad escape systems 2. 5% q Intact abort 12. 5% q Open injection seats 64% q Escape Cabin 84% **89% of failures occur during launch ***85% of launch failures in first stage therefore 15% scaled for upper stages

Abort Scenario Earth (Stephen Hanna) q 1) Zero altitude – Ejection seat abort q

Abort Scenario Earth (Stephen Hanna) q 1) Zero altitude – Ejection seat abort q 2) Booster separated at altitude of 80 km speed is Ejection seat is viable § Theoretical not viable higher than 40 km b/c of pressure suits but has been used at 90 km with survival q 3) Main core separation at altitude of 110 km - abort to orbit using RCS thruster usable after main core separation with a 99%* success rate *3 failures out of 207 launches after 1970 improvements to system y b Effective Atmosphere 3 2 1 Earth

Abort Scenario Earth cont… q Pressure suits § Protect against loss of pressure up

Abort Scenario Earth cont… q Pressure suits § Protect against loss of pressure up to an altitude of 40 km § Extreme temperatures and dynamic pressure in case of an abort § Suits self contained • Autonomous oxygen • Survival kits and Backup Parachutes • 40 kg 10 kg person * 4 (Stephen Hanna) q Ejection Seats § Self Contained • Propulsive device • Autonomous oxygen • Parachutes (drone chute and main chute) § 816 kg for all four seats (conservative estimates) • 204 kg each*4 crew = 816 kg total § Proven at varied speeds and altitudes

Abort Scenario Earth (Stephen Hanna) q. Pyrotechnics **Not to scale

Abort Scenario Earth (Stephen Hanna) q. Pyrotechnics **Not to scale

Abort Scenario Earth q. Pyrotechnics (Stephen Hanna) Ohh! Spaghetti O’s!! **Not to scale

Abort Scenario Earth q. Pyrotechnics (Stephen Hanna) Ohh! Spaghetti O’s!! **Not to scale

Abort Scenario Mars q. CTV is jettisoned using RCS thrusters from MLV q. Parachutes

Abort Scenario Mars q. CTV is jettisoned using RCS thrusters from MLV q. Parachutes are deployed for landing in use with RCS thrusters

Ejection Pod q Mass of Ejection Pod 140 kg + Ejection seats 816 kg

Ejection Pod q Mass of Ejection Pod 140 kg + Ejection seats 816 kg + Suits 40 kg 996 kg q Costly q Effects total payload due to volume requirements of system therefore reducing payload capacity

Escape Tower • Mass Total = 93, 680 Kg (can we do this? )

Escape Tower • Mass Total = 93, 680 Kg (can we do this? ) • Mass payload = 75, 000 Kg • Escape Tower = 18, 680 kg • ‘Dry Mass’ Rocket= 6, 125 Kg • Mass prop = 12555 Kg q. Assumptions: q. Liquid engine q. Safety height of 1 km q. Using solid rocket motor q 6 seconds burn time q. Max acceleration of 12 g’s q. Structural mass of 10% q. Reduces payload capacity by less than 20% of its own mass? q. No drag or gravity considered {Mass of tower/ Mass of Cabin} Historically: Mercury = 0. 29 Apollo = 0. 71 Soyuz = 0. 31 Hermes = 0. 43 Ariane = 0. 44 Comparison Our system=0. 25