Provider Directory Advisory Committee Meeting July 19 2017
- Slides: 8
Provider Directory Advisory Committee Meeting July 19, 2017
Welcome! • Meeting agenda review (5 min) • Updates and discussion set-up (15 min) • Procurement update • PDAC and Provider Directory Subject Matter Expert Workgroup (PD-SME) updates • User adoption discussion (~60 min) • Break (10 min) • User adoption discussion (~80 min) • Close (10 min)
Objectives for today’s meeting • Achieve consensus for what must be included in the communications plan that will ensure successful Provider Directory User Adoption • Continue to build on list of gaps, barriers, and issues • Identify timelines, resources, and success metrics
Project Updates • Funding • Implementation-Advanced Planning Document (IAPD) draft to CMS • Contains our Medicaid definition which needs to be approved by CMS • Medicaid definition defines who are allowed users in the first phases of the Provider Directory and who does/does not pay fees • Procurement • State approval for “Stage Gate 3” and Mi. HIN contract • MIHIN contract sent to CMS on July 5 th 4
PDAC and PD-SME Updates • PDAC • Ruthie Petty leaving PDAC • PD-SME met on June 12 th: • Use case discussions for Payers, Operations, Analytics, and health information exchange (HIE) • Key takeaways: • HIE, delivery, and analytics uses are good options for early adopters, not payers • Analytics users could work through data issues, test, and inform data quality metrics • For payers, Medicare Advantage audits are a key sticking point; the PD must be able to be trusted; quality, cost, high use, and replacing existing processes are all factors • Data quality metrics will be challenging, knowing the date and source of the data is important • Many data elements are needed across all use cases (e. g. , name, address, phone, etc. ) but there are standalone required elements (examples below) • HIE – Direct Secure Message address and trust community information • Payers – Accepting new patients • Analytics – Want everything • Important for users to stay within their workflow • Next steps – work on data definitions, refining use cases, analyzing new use cases 5
PD Roadmap Review • Purpose: a compilation of information (much of it derived from PDAC and PDAG) on one sheet; contains elements of PD adoption/implementation but not an action plan • What is one thing that stood out to you?
User Adoption Discussion Question: What needs to be considered/included in our PD adoption and outreach plan to ensure widespread PD user adoption? “Knowns” • Phased approach to implementation, start with Medicaid, build value • Go-live is Summer 2018 • Mi. HIN is the selected vendor • Resources: OHA staff, PD stakeholder groups, small budget for marketing • Timeline: over PD Implementation period (30 months)
Q & A/Close • For this meeting, what worked well? • What could we do better next time? • What questions do you have?
