OTHER MEASURES OF MORTALITY AGECOHORT ANALYSIS Nigel Paneth

  • Slides: 16
Download presentation
 OTHER MEASURES OF MORTALITY AGE-COHORT ANALYSIS Nigel Paneth

OTHER MEASURES OF MORTALITY AGE-COHORT ANALYSIS Nigel Paneth

Two Other Measures Of Burden Of Illness/mortality Less Widely Used 1. YEARS OF POTENTIAL

Two Other Measures Of Burden Of Illness/mortality Less Widely Used 1. YEARS OF POTENTIAL LIFE LOST (YPLL) 2. DISABILITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS (DALYS)

Years Of Potential Life Lost (YPLL) • The number of deaths due to a

Years Of Potential Life Lost (YPLL) • The number of deaths due to a cause of disease multiplied by the difference in years between age at death and a certain target age. • Target age can be 65, 70, mean age at death in the population, or any other age you choose.

Years Of Potential Life Lost (YPLL) For example, If the target age is 70,

Years Of Potential Life Lost (YPLL) For example, If the target age is 70, then: 100 deaths at age 60 = 1, 000 YPLL 50 deaths at age 40 = 1, 000 YPLL 20 deaths at age 20 = 1, 000 YPLL

Disability-adjusted Life Years (DALYS) This adds a measure of disability to YPLL. If we

Disability-adjusted Life Years (DALYS) This adds a measure of disability to YPLL. If we know the incidence of disabilities, and can score their severity, we can roughly quantify the amount of years lost, not just to death, but to disabling conditions as well. WHO refers to DALYs as measuring the Global Burden of Disease (GBD).

DALY’S FROM COMMUNICABLE DISEASES IN DIFFERENT PARTS OF THE WORLD INDIA CHINA EUROPE Tuberculosis

DALY’S FROM COMMUNICABLE DISEASES IN DIFFERENT PARTS OF THE WORLD INDIA CHINA EUROPE Tuberculosis 4% 3% Diarrhea 10% 2% Respiratory Infections 11% 6% Total Communicable 50% 25% USA/WESTERN 0. 2% 0. 3% 2. 6% 10%

DALY’S FROM OTHER DISEASES IN DIFFERENT PARTS OF THE WORLD INDIA CHINA USA/WESTERN EUROPE

DALY’S FROM OTHER DISEASES IN DIFFERENT PARTS OF THE WORLD INDIA CHINA USA/WESTERN EUROPE Cancer 4% 9% 19. 0% Perinatal Causes 9% 5% 2. 2% Injuries 9% 17% 12. 0%. TOTAL DALY’S PER 1, 000 344 178 94 POPULATION .

AGE, PERIOD AND COHORT EFFECTS

AGE, PERIOD AND COHORT EFFECTS

AGE EFFECTS Patterns of disease frequency which are due to the aging of the

AGE EFFECTS Patterns of disease frequency which are due to the aging of the population. Example: Rates of coronary artery disease by age.

PERIOD EFFECTS Patterns of disease frequency which are due to the period of time

PERIOD EFFECTS Patterns of disease frequency which are due to the period of time in which the people live. Example: Elevated death rates from pneumonia and influenza in the winter

COHORT EFFECTS Patterns of disease frequency due to an exposure occurring to a group

COHORT EFFECTS Patterns of disease frequency due to an exposure occurring to a group of people at about the same time in their lives (and who are therefore of the same age, and, who, as they age, represent a cohort) Examples: • Birth cohort - all people born in 1900 • Veteran cohort - all men (of similar ages)who served in the military together • Employment cohort - all individuals (of similar ages) hired by a company at about

DETECTING COHORT EFFECTS • Cohort effects are a special interaction of age and period.

DETECTING COHORT EFFECTS • Cohort effects are a special interaction of age and period. • The three effects are interrelated. Once two are specified the third is determined by the other two • Cohort effects are often hard to detect because analysis is usually by age and period. • Cohort effects are usually seen as an elevated risk which changes with age over time

DISEASES WITH COHORT EFFECTS Many important disease time-trends can better be understood by cohort

DISEASES WITH COHORT EFFECTS Many important disease time-trends can better be understood by cohort analysis. This includes: Peptic ulcer tuberculosis congenital rubella prostate cancer (possibly)

Class Exercise

Class Exercise

DEAF-MUTES IN NEW SOUTH WALES, AUSTRALIA AGE 0 -4 5 -9 10 -14 15

DEAF-MUTES IN NEW SOUTH WALES, AUSTRALIA AGE 0 -4 5 -9 10 -14 15 -19 20 -24 25 -29 30 -34 35 -39 1911 16 59 111 64 65 60 54 57 1921 17 72 86 57 117 59 67 62 1933 11 95 89 141 98 69 140 71 Do you see the birth cohort effect in these data?

The data show a peak in deaf-mutes among 10 -14 years olds in 1911,

The data show a peak in deaf-mutes among 10 -14 years olds in 1911, among 20 -24 year olds in 1921, and among 30 -34 year olds in 1933. This is clearly the same cohort that is aging. Later research showed that a rubella epidemic took place in New South Wales at the same time that this cohort was in utero. The effects of congenital rubella infection in causing sensori-neural hearing loss were not discovered until decades later, but these data were early evidence of the effects of the epidemic.