MM 1 0 1971 2006 1996 2006 1971

  • Slides: 16
Download presentation

MM总生存期的趋势 1. 0 总生存期 1971– 2006 诊断周期 1996– 2006 1971– 1996 0. 8 2001–

MM总生存期的趋势 1. 0 总生存期 1971– 2006 诊断周期 1996– 2006 1971– 1996 0. 8 2001– 2006 生存率 0. 6 45 个月 30 个月 (P<0. 001) OS, overall survival. 0. 4 0. 2 0 0 2 中位 OS 20 40 60 80 100 距离诊断时间(月) Kumar SK, et al. Blood. 2008; 111: 2516 -2520. 120 140 1971– 1976 1989– 1994 1977– 1982 1995– 2000 1983– 1988 2001– 2006 M

CR与诱导后和移植后OS延长相关 只接受化疗 化疗和移植 291例(年龄<70岁)MM患者只接受化疗,375例化疗后接受移植(右),比较两种情 况生存率与缓解程度的关系(CR vs PR or NR P<0. 01) 1. Lahuerta et

CR与诱导后和移植后OS延长相关 只接受化疗 化疗和移植 291例(年龄<70岁)MM患者只接受化疗,375例化疗后接受移植(右),比较两种情 况生存率与缓解程度的关系(CR vs PR or NR P<0. 01) 1. Lahuerta et al. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26(3): 5775 -5782. 2. Alexanian et al. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2001; 27: 1037 -1043. 3. Wang, et al. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010; 45(3): 498 -504. 4

CR对老年MM患者的重要性 > 65岁 > 75岁 Gay F et al. Blood. 2011; 117(11): 3025 -3031)

CR对老年MM患者的重要性 > 65岁 > 75岁 Gay F et al. Blood. 2011; 117(11): 3025 -3031)

基于硼替佐米的移植前诱导治疗 Regimen N CR+VGPR Post. Induction (%) Cavo et al, 2010 VTD vs TD

基于硼替佐米的移植前诱导治疗 Regimen N CR+VGPR Post. Induction (%) Cavo et al, 2010 VTD vs TD 236 62* 82* 68% at 3 yr 238 28 64 56% at 3 yr Moreau et al, 2011 IFM 2007/02 VD vs v. TD 99 36 58 100 49‡ 74§ Trial CR+VGPR Post. ASCT (%) PFS Median 30 months Median 26 mo P Value. 0057 . 22 *P <. 001; †P =. 001; ‡P =. 05; §P =. 02 GMMG= German Multiple Myeloma Group; SCT = stem cell transplant; CR = complete response; VGPR = very good partial response; PAD = bortezomib (V)/AD; T = thalidomide; VAD = vincristine, doxorubicin (A), dexamethasone (D); v. TD = reduced-dose bortezomib. Cavo M, et al. Lancet. 2010; 376: 2075 -2085. Harousseau JL, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28: 4621 -4629. Sonneveld P, et al. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts. 2010; 116(21): 40. http: //web. educationalconcepts. net/Newsletter/MMY 015 AE 1. pdf. Accessed July 17, 2012. Moreau P, et al. Blood. 2011; 118: 5752 -5758.

老年MM患者:MPT vs MP Fayers PM et al. Blood. 2011; 118(5): 1239 -1247

老年MM患者:MPT vs MP Fayers PM et al. Blood. 2011; 118(5): 1239 -1247

老年MM患者:MPR vs MP Palumbo et al. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 1759 -69.

老年MM患者:MPR vs MP Palumbo et al. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 1759 -69.

硼替佐米治疗不适合移植MM患者 Study Regimen VISTA San Miguel et al. VMP Mateos et al. MP Phase

硼替佐米治疗不适合移植MM患者 Study Regimen VISTA San Miguel et al. VMP Mateos et al. MP Phase III UPFRONT Niesvizky et al. Phase III VMP/Vel VTD/Vel VD/Vel N ORR CR/n. CR Outcomes 344 338 71% 35% 33% 4% 5 yr OS: 46% 5 yr OS: 34. 4% 300 73% 79% 71% 36% 34% ORR: overall response rate; CR: complete response; n. CR: near complete response; OS: overall survival; TTP: time to progression; PFS: progression free survival; VMP: Bortezomib-melphalandexamethasone; MP: Melphalan-Prednisone; VTP: Bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone; VTD: bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone; VD: bortezomib-dexamethasone; VMPT-VT: bortezomibmelphalan-prednisone-thalidomide followed by bortezomib-thalidomide maintenance