Introduction to the workshop 2007 04 1213 SNAP

  • Slides: 7
Download presentation
Introduction to the workshop 2007 -04 -12/13 SNAP data model

Introduction to the workshop 2007 -04 -12/13 SNAP data model

Welcome • agenda • Background – Cambridge workshop, April 2006 • Propose SNAP (used

Welcome • agenda • Background – Cambridge workshop, April 2006 • Propose SNAP (used to be SPAP, should maybe be SSSAP) – Victoria interop meeting, May 2006 • Agreed to go ahead with SNAP • SNAP should be mirrored on SSAP, not SIAP, i. e. based on a data model for the meta-data 2007 -04 -12/13 SNAP data model

From Victoria 2006, closing plenary What is SNAP ? • Subject: – N-body –

From Victoria 2006, closing plenary What is SNAP ? • Subject: – N-body – (adaptive) mesh – “evolving objects in 3 D space” • Functions: – Retrieve whole – Retrieve part: Question, how to decide which part ? – Proposal: need functions creating small, summarising, meaningful info about the dataset. Examples: thumbnail, random sample, projection, gridding (for particles). (see CGs presentation) • Query: based on metadata model • Protocol: not discussed here, but initial draft exists. ADQL ? 2007 -04 -12/13 SNAP data model

Preliminary discussion items 2007 -04 -12/13 SNAP data model

Preliminary discussion items 2007 -04 -12/13 SNAP data model

Name of the protocol • SNAP is confusing – “Numerical” suggests more than we

Name of the protocol • SNAP is confusing – “Numerical” suggests more than we aim to support – SNAP acronym is already in use for Supernova/Acceleration Probe http: //snap. lbl. gov/ • How about: Simple Spatial Simulations Access Protocol (SSSAP) 2007 -04 -12/13 SNAP data model

Type of simulations in SNAP TBD do we still need this comparison? • We

Type of simulations in SNAP TBD do we still need this comparison? • We have had some discussions concerning which type of simulations we want SNAP to support and about the kind of services that should be supported. • GL: the case for spatial simulations – – – Common subject: part of space-time Results relatively standard Some large software packages used by many people Theory spectra supported by SSA (is claim) We need to start somewhere • HW: the case for more generic simulations (is this what HW wanted to discuss, or more the services? ) 2007 -04 -12/13 SNAP data model

Type of services in SNAP (can only really discuss this later in this workshop)

Type of services in SNAP (can only really discuss this later in this workshop) • Spatial cutout services only – Produces data products of same type as published data products • A few more “SNAP-standard” services (building blocks): – – Projections Light-cones Transformation of observables … • Also allow cutouts (etc? ) on the dependent variables (observables) • Allow also generic, notn-prescribed services (like the ones that can be registered already) 2007 -04 -12/13 SNAP data model