Educator Effectiveness System Changes Overview Using Data to

Educator Effectiveness System Changes Overview Using Data to Drive Effective Teaching Elizabeth Ayotte – EES Support, BKM Complex Daniel Espaniola – EO EES, HLLM Complex

Objectives for Today Become familiar with what the differentiated cycles are for SY 15 -16 Learn about timelines related to EES components Understand the PDPDP and its purpose Review mandatory trainings for teachers for SY 15 -16 Clarification on any of the changes to EES The new look of PDE 3

Evaluation Cycle Implementation Timeline (For Teachers Rated Effective or Better) 2015 -16 2016 -17 2017 -18 Group A Streamlined Standard Streamlined Group B Streamlined Standard • Non Tenured teachers and tenured teachers rated less than effective will be on an ANNUAL ENHANCED Comprehensive evaluation. • Tenured teachers rated as effective or better will participate in an alternating schedule of Standard Comprehensive and Streamlined Comprehensive evaluation. **OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES will publish a schedule related to group A and B participants in Spring of 2016.

A tenured teacher with no EES Rating from SY 14 -15 will be on a STANDARD evaluation track • Reasons a tenured teacher would not have an EES rating may include: - On extended leave - Completed probation on PEP-T - Returning from TA VP position

Expectations for 2015 -16 ENHANCED Cycle for CLASSROOM Teacher Classroom Observations 2 observation cycles or more per year, 1 x in Fall and 1 x in Spring semester. Core Professionalism (and Tripod) All classroom teachers will document and submit evidence within Domain 4 in PDE 3 and reflect on student surveys (Gr. 3 -12). Hawaii Growth Model Classroom teachers who teach ELA and Math in grades 48 will roster verify in the Spring and receive growth data for their students. Beginning teachers will not receive SGP data due to the one year lag. Student Learning Objective Teachers will complete 1 SLO using the template and record sheet. PDPDP or PDP Using data from areas within EES, target areas of growth or improvement within Teacher Practice and Student Growth and develop goals. *The PDPDP should be designed and approved within the first 30 days from the first day of instruction.

Expectations for SY 2015 -16 for STANDARD Cycle for CLASSROOM Teacher Classroom Observation (s) 1 observation or more a year Core Professionalism (and Tripod) All classroom teachers will document and submit evidence within Domain 4 in PDE 3 and reflect on the student survey (Gr. 3 -12). Hawaii Growth Model Classroom teachers who teach ELA and Math in grades 4 -8 will roster verify in the Spring and receive growth data for their students. Student Learning Objective Teachers will complete 1 SLO. PDP Using data from areas within EES, or school or complex needs, target area of growth or improvement. This will be shared at the beginning of year conference with administrator for approval.

Expectations for 2015 -16 for STREAMLINED Cycle for CLASSROOM Teacher Classroom Observation(s) No classroom observation(s) required. Core Professionalism (and Tripod) Reflection on student survey results embedded with the PDP if applicable. Hawaii Growth Model Reflection on Student Growth results embedded within the PDP if applicable. Student Learning Objective Completion of template not required. *Expectation to participate in data teams and monitor student results as a normal part of teaching. PDP Using data from areas within EES, or school or complex needs, target area of growth or improvement. This will be shared at the beginning of year conference with administrator for approval. *If a teacher demonstrates a documented performance deficiency, their Administrator can place them on a STANDARD evaluation immediately.

Professional Development Plan (PDP) Teachers rated Effective or better Identify areas of growth and develop goals Share the Plan with administrator before the end of 1 st quarter Progress check suggested by the first week in Jan Teachers submits evidence for completion before Ending Conference Completion of the plan is a matter of professional responsibility but progress on Plan can be used as evidence in Core Professionalism

Principal Directed Professional Development Plan Teachers rated Less than Effective Use previous EES data to identify areas of targeted growth and learning as directed or in collaboration with administrator Plan must be approved by Principal 30 days from the first day of instruction Progress is monitored by the teachers and Administrator. It can be used as evidence for the EES rating. Failure to make progress on a PDPDP may results in an Unsatisfactory Core Professionalism rating.

Overview Training for Teachers NEW to the EES Teacher Practice Student Growth and Learning - Intro to the Framework for Teaching - Working Portfolio - Core Professionalism - SLO / SSIO - Hawaii Growth Model *Complete by AUGUST 31 st *Late hires must complete the overview training and view the EES Orientation video, prior to being evaluated. Online modules will be provided through a course in PDE 3. EES ORIENTATION *All teachers during an Administrative Day*

Deadline Component Prior to first day of instruction EES Orientation All teachers participate 8/31 EES Overview Any teachers NEW to EES (e. g. do not have a prior EES rating) 9/4 SLO/SSIO Evaluator approves 1 st semester SLO/SSIO for implementation 9/10 PDPDP Any teacher rated less than effective will complete at the direction of his/her evaluator, *within the first 30 days of instruction. 10/2 PDP Evaluator review PDP goals 10/2 SLO/SSIO Evaluator approves Yearlong SLO/SSIO for implementation 10/31 Working Portfolio Evaluator and NCT agree to and approve Working Portfolio components 2/19 SLO/SSIO Evaluator approves 2 nd semester SLO/SSIO for implementation 5/20 Final EES Rating Evaluator finalizes and locks components and provides overall EES rating

Questions?