Overview of ASW Process Effectiveness Status NC Educator

Overview of ASW Process

Effectiveness Status NC Educator Evaluation System 1 2 3 4 5 Demonstrate Leadership Establish Environment Know Content 5 Rating Categories Not Demonstrated Developing Proficient Accomplished Distinguished Facilitate Learning Reflect on Practice 6 Contribute to Academic Success 3 Rating Categories

Overview of Standard 6 Contribute to Academic Success 6 End of Grade (EOG) or End of Course (EOC) tests 6 Career Technical Education Assessment 6 NC Final Exams 6 K-3 Checkpoints 6 Analysis of Student Work

Analysis of Student Work In 2014 -2015, ASW is the Standard 6 measure for teachers in Advanced Placement, Arts Education, Healthful Living, International Baccalaureate, and World Languages. Contribute to Academic Success Growth is based on student work submitted by teachers and rated by content experts in a “blind review” process. 6 Analysis of Student Work

Overview: Analysis of Student Work ASW Process

ASW Process: A Quick Guide

Teaching Context • Screen shot

Principal’s Input Principal receives a notification once a teacher’s schedule has been validated. The principal will then log into the Online Platform to confirm that the schedule is correct.

Class Selection Beginning in 2014 – 2015, the online platform will select the classes in which the teacher must collect artifacts.

Objective Selection Objectives: Using the Strands and Standards guidance charts, the teacher will choose 5 objectives.

Principal’s Input Principal meets with the teacher to confirm that the 5 objectives chosen use the parameters in the Strands & Standards Guidance Chart Some examples of meetings: • PDPs • teacher meetings

5 Timelapse Artifacts Teacher decisions needed to compile a Timelapse Artifact (TA): a) A specific objective b) Sample type • Individual Student or • Whole Class c) Collection Method d) Samples from Point 1 and Point 2 e) Context

Time passes. . . . . Teachers Collect Work Samples for Timelapse Artifacts

Student Selection Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Individual Student Work Samples Online platform will select 3 students The TA will be compiled using the Individual Student Work Samples from these selected students. TA 1

Student Selection Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Individual Student Work Samples If a student work sample is unavailable, that student will be reshuffled another student will be selected. TA 1

Principal’s Input The Principal is notified when a reshuffle is used by a teacher. TA 1

Upload Evidence Context for 1 st work sample in each Timelapse Artifact How does this artifact show where the student is in relation to the chosen clarifying objective? This artifact was created using an 8 th grade Healthful Living Health Education Class containing 32 students before instruction on the objective began. In this video, the student did not show proper technique in their performance of CPR in the following ways. 1. The students body position has him sitting on the victims waist. 2. The hands have been placed separately on the victims upper chest. 3. The compressions given are of insufficient depth and are given too slow. 4. The elbows are bending during the compression.

Upload Evidence Context for Growth in each Timelapse Artifact Describe the growth that occurred between Points 1 and 2. CPR performed with the technique in video #1 was inadequate and would not have given the victim an opportunity to survive. The technique in video #2 would provide blood flow and oxygen to give the victim a chance of survival

Upload Evidence TA 3 Student All 5 Timelapse Artifacts will be uploaded to the online platform as the teacher’s Evidence Collection for the school year. TA 1 Student TA 4 Student TA 2 Whole Class TA 5 Whole Class

Blind Review The Evidence Collection will be reviewed by 2 content area specialists. D Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2 M E

Blind Review If the category ratings from the two reviewers are not the same, the Evidence Collection is automatically sent to a 3 rd reviewer for an additional review to get a rating for that year. Reviewer #3 M Reviewer #1 E Reviewer #2

Effectiveness Status 3 Years of Combined Data for Standard 6 Year 1 Standard Year 2 Year 3 6 6 An educator receives an Effectiveness Status when he or she has 3 years of their own data for Standard 6

Questions about Educator Effectiveness, NCEES or ASW Visit www. ncpublicschools. org/effectiveness-model or http: //ncees. ncdpi. wikispaces. net/ NCEES+Wiki or ASW Wiki at http: //ncasw. ncdpi. wikispaces. net/ You can also email questions to bglendenning@wcpss. net for Healthful Living Egrimes-droessler@wcpss. net for the Arts Dramirez-carter@wcpss. net for World Languages Sgolden-perry@wcpss. net for AP/IB ehiggins@wcpss. net for Course Codes