Contracts for Excellence New York Citys failures and

Contracts for Excellence: New York City’s failures and violations of law as regards class size (updated) Community Education Council District 19 November 22, 2011 Elli Marcus, Class Size Matters

Why is class size important? • Class size reduction one of 4 reforms proven to work through rigorous evidence, acc. to Inst. Education Sciences, research arm of US Ed Dept. * • Benefits especially large for disadvantaged & minority students, very effective at narrowing the achievement gap. • NYC schools have largest class sizes in state; in 2003, NY’s highest court said students denied constitutional right to adequate education as a result of excessive class sizes (Campaign for Fiscal Equity decision). • 86% of NYC principals say cannot provide a quality education because of excessive class sizes. • Smaller classes are top priority of parents on DOE learning environment surveys every year. • *Other three K-12 evidence-based reforms, are one-on-one tutoring by qualified tutors for at-risk readers in grades 1 -3, Life-Skills training for junior high students, and instruction for early readers in phonemic awareness and phonics.

Despite claims of administration, stagnant achievement in NYC schools since Bloomberg elected • Over the last 8 yrs. , NYC black & Hispanic students fallen further behind their peers in other large cities, according to national assessments (NAEPs); • NYC only city where non-poor students have lower NAEP average scores than in 2003. • NYC’s real graduation rate about 54% (including discharges), & three-quarters of HS grads need remediation in college. • Only 21% of HS grads are “college ready”; and those needing triple remediation* at CUNY have doubled in last 5 years. * Triple remediation means make-up classes in reading, writing & math.

Contracts for Excellence • In April 2007, NY State settled the Campaign for Fiscal lawsuit by passing the Contracts for Excellence (C 4 E) law. State agreed to send billions in additional aid to NYC & other high needs school districts; which they would have to spend in six approved areas, including class size reduction. * • In addition, NYC had to submit a plan to reduce class size in all grades. • In fall of 2007, the state approved DOE’s plan to reduce class sizes on average to no more than 20 students per class in K-3; 23 in grades 4 -8 and 25 in core HS classes. • In return, NYS has sent $2. 4 billion in C 4 E funds to NYC since 2007. *other allowed programs include Time on Task; Teacher & Principal Quality; Middle & HS Restructuring; Full-Day Pre-K; & Model Programs for English Language Learners

But class sizes have risen sharply in all grades since 2007…esp. in K-3; now largest in 11 yrs! 28 D 19 k-3 class sizes were below C 4 E goals now rising far above Students per Section 26 24 23, 9 C 4 E goals 22, 9 21, 7 21, 4 21 20 D 19 22, 1 22 19, 8 20, 9 20, 7 Citywide actual 22, 8 21 20, 5 20, 3 19, 9 20, 1 19, 9 19, 5 18 Baseline 2007 -8 2008 -9 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 This year’s class size data available at http: //schools. nyc. gov/About. Us/data/classsize. htm

Also in grades 4 -8, class sizes have increased 27 D 19 4 -8 class sizes continue sharp increase since 2007, far above C 4 E goals 26, 3 26 25, 8 25, 6 25, 1 24, 8 Students per Section 25 25, 3 24, 8 24, 6 24 23, 9 23, 8 C 4 E target 23, 3 23 26, 6 23 Citywide actual D 19 22, 2 22 21 20 Baseline 2007 -8 2008 -9 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12

Also in HS: average class sizes have risen HS core class sizes actuals vs. C 4 E goals 27, 5 27 27 26, 6 students per class 26, 5 26 25, 5 26 26, 1 25, 6 25, 7 26, 2 Actual C 4 E targets 25, 2 25 24, 8 24, 5 24 23, 5 23 2007 -8 2008 -9 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12

What happened? • Despite more than $2 billion in C 4 E funds and higher overall spending, city has cut school budgets about 14% since 2007. • Maintenance of effort provision in C 4 E law was ignored (city cut funding to schools when state increased spending) • Overcrowding in many schools worsened by growing enrollment & damaging co-locations. • C 4 E state funding never reached full level & has now flat -lined or slightly decreased.

But even when state C 4 E spending increased; class sizes grew ! $ 700 24 645 $ 600 23 22, 9 531 $ 500 22, 1 $ 400 C 4 E spending (in millions) 22 21, 4 21 21 20, 9 $ 300 258 K-3 average class size 20 $ 200 19 $ 100 $- C 4 E goals 0 2006 -7 18 2007 -2008 -9 2009 -2010 -2011 -2012

Why? administration had other priorities • Between 2002 -9, while out-of-classroom positions grew by over 10 thousand, general ed classroom teachers shrunk by more than 1600. * • In 2010, there were 2, 000 fewer teaching positions and 18, 000 more students. • This year, there are 2, 500 fewer teachers and 20, 000 more students. • Spending on testing, contracts, consultants, and more bureaucrats have all risen sharply. • (including principals, secretaries, APs, literacy coaches, etc. NY Times, “With More Money, City Schools Added Jobs, ” June 30, 2009).

But can we afford to reduce class size? • In 2009, DOE estimated that it would cost $358 million per year to achieve average C 4 E class size goals across the city; • DOE estimated it would cost $448 million per year in staffing to achieve class size goals in ALL schools; plus more in capital costs for school construction. • This year, NYC is to receive more than $530 million in C 4 E funds.

What happened in D 19? 9000 8800 480 D 19 k-3 sections/teachers continue to shrink sharper than student population declines 460 8600 8400 440 430 8389 Total Students 420 413 8233 8200 8189 Total Students 400 8000 390 Total Sections 7936 380 7800 366 7764 360 7600 341 7400 7200 340 320 2007 -8 2008 -9 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12

What Happened in D 19? 10000 480 D 19 4 -8 sections/teachers dropped sharply as well 9800 460 9600 9626 9400 Total Students 433 440 9395 9238 9200 420 9000 9040 410 Total Students Total 8898 Sections 400 8800 386 8600 380 8400 364 8200 360 352 8000 340 2007 -8 2008 -9 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12

Other questions re city’s plan • State ed allocated $530. 8 M in C 4 E funds to city this year. Yet city’s plan only includes $348 M; what happened to rest of these funds? • Why did the city choose not to centrally allocate a penny of C 4 E funds to class size reduction, given they had a legal obligation to lower class size ? • Only C 4 E district-wide initiative that DOE claims as “class size reduction” is to expand CTT classes, which does not lower class size.

Problems with public process • This year, C 4 E meetings happening too late in the school year; supposed to happen before money spent, so public can have input. • This yr. , SED asked to “pre-approve” plan; but state law says city’s plan should be submitted to state only after public hearings occurred, so that public comments can help guide decision as to whether plan needs changing. • C 4 E law requires for borough hearings as well as CEC presentations; but DOE has refused to do this since 2008. • See letter to Commissioner King from CSM & UFT, pointing out the many violations of law in public process this year.

What can CEC’s do? • Pass a resolution; we have a sample one for yr. consideration. • Write a letter to Commissioner King, to protest the botched process & DOE’s failure to reduce class size and/or send a message to contractsforexcellence@schools. nyc. gov (deadline Nov. 23) • Encourage parents to submit C 4 E complaint as per law, we will be offering help w/ this. • Collect information about class sizes in your district’s schools, violations of union contract & building code. • Questions or to join newsletter list, email us at info@classsizematters. org

Contractual limits vs. C 4 E class size goals UFT Contract limits Kindergarten 1 -3 grades 4 -5 (Title 1 Schools) 4 -5 (Non-Title 1) 6 -8 (Title 1 Schools) 6 -8 (Non-Title 1) 9 -12 (core classes) C 4 E Class Size goals by 2011 25 32 (DOE used to respect 28) 32 19. 9 32 30 22. 9 33 34 22. 9 24. 5 22. 9

NYC Building code for classroom space • Requires 35 Sq. ft. per Kindergarten student, 20 Sq. ft. per student in grades 1 -12 • DOE’s “instructional footprint” redefined full size classroom downward with minimum 500 sq. ft. • 500 sq. ft. legally holds only 14 Kindergarten students, 25 students in grades 1 st-12 th. • Sq. footage of each room listed in Annual Facilities survey on every school’s DOE portal.