The Effects of Chivalry and Group Size on

  • Slides: 14
Download presentation
The Effects of Chivalry and Group Size on Helping Behavior Jessica Heun Nathaniel Moore

The Effects of Chivalry and Group Size on Helping Behavior Jessica Heun Nathaniel Moore

Chivalry • A “cultural script prescribing the preferential treatment of women by men in

Chivalry • A “cultural script prescribing the preferential treatment of women by men in the contexts of protection and provision” (Altermatt, 2001).

Chivalry Findings • More offers of assistance were found when a stranded driver was

Chivalry Findings • More offers of assistance were found when a stranded driver was female (Simón, 1976). • Men are in general less aggressive and more helpful towards women than towards men (Eagly & Steffen, 1986; Eagly & Crowley, 1986). • Confusion arises when women perform chivalrous acts towards men (Ventimiglia, 1982).

Chivalry and Helping • Connecting factor of responsibility • Chivalry: cultivates responsibility to intervene

Chivalry and Helping • Connecting factor of responsibility • Chivalry: cultivates responsibility to intervene in an emergency situation • Presence of others: counteracts that responsibility (diffusion)

Diffusion of Responsibility • As group size increases, the less likely or more slowly

Diffusion of Responsibility • As group size increases, the less likely or more slowly any one bystander will provide assistance. • Epileptic Seizure Study (Darley and Latane, 1969)

Our Hypothesis!!! • Low chivalry more influenced by group size • High chivalry more

Our Hypothesis!!! • Low chivalry more influenced by group size • High chivalry more resistant to outside pressure

Step 1: Subject Variable • Sample Items: Chivalry Scale (α =. 86) - A

Step 1: Subject Variable • Sample Items: Chivalry Scale (α =. 86) - A man has an obligation to protect a woman who is in danger (Altermatt, 2001). Attitude toward Women Scale (α =. 77) - Women should worry less about their rights and more about becoming good wives and mothers (Spence, Helmreich, & Stapp, 1974).

Step 2: Manipulate Group Size • Cover Story – Sign up Sheets and Backpacks

Step 2: Manipulate Group Size • Cover Story – Sign up Sheets and Backpacks

Step 3: Measure Helping • Participant (N = 30 males) taken to room to

Step 3: Measure Helping • Participant (N = 30 males) taken to room to complete questionnaire. • Recording of the accident is played (timing begins). • 3 minute window

Results β p Group (G) . 37 . 05 Chiv (C) -. 35 .

Results β p Group (G) . 37 . 05 Chiv (C) -. 35 . 046 Cx. G . 04 . 81

Interpretations - Alone: situational pressure = help - 3 others: situational pressure = don’t

Interpretations - Alone: situational pressure = help - 3 others: situational pressure = don’t help - 1 other: situation ambiguous = personality factors become more influential - Greatest chivalry effect (difference = 1. 823 minutes)

Future Research • Self-esteem research (chivalry contingency) • Agentic versus Virtuous women • Chivalry

Future Research • Self-esteem research (chivalry contingency) • Agentic versus Virtuous women • Chivalry in women? • More than 3 minute window for helping

Questions?

Questions?

Sound File • Sound played to participants over intercom

Sound File • Sound played to participants over intercom