Safety of autonomous trains Group 1 Laura Hutten

  • Slides: 15
Download presentation
Safety of autonomous trains Group 1 Laura Hutten – s 1725696 Anuj kumar Chalotra

Safety of autonomous trains Group 1 Laura Hutten – s 1725696 Anuj kumar Chalotra – s 2024276 Shrikanth Venkataramana– s 2336464

Contents ▪ What is the system? ▪ To what safety level? ▪ What are

Contents ▪ What is the system? ▪ To what safety level? ▪ What are the hazards? ▪ How to control them? 2

What is the system? Grade of Automation ● ● ● Go. A 0 -

What is the system? Grade of Automation ● ● ● Go. A 0 - Manual Go. A 1 - Manual with ATP Go. A 2 - Semi-ATO + full ATP Go. A 3 - Driverless, full ATO + full ATP Go. A 4 - Unattended, full ATO + full ATP 3

What is the system? Grade of Automation ● ● ● Go. A 0 -

What is the system? Grade of Automation ● ● ● Go. A 0 - Manual Go. A 1 - Manual with ATP Go. A 2 - Semi-ATO + full ATP Go. A 3 - Driverless, full ATO + full ATP Go. A 4 - Unattended, full ATO + full ATP Disadvantage: separated infra and transport 4

ATP ▪ ECTS ▪ ERTMS 5

ATP ▪ ECTS ▪ ERTMS 5

ATO 6

ATO 6

Safety Regulations Different types of safety regulations: ▪ Type A - Basic safety standards:

Safety Regulations Different types of safety regulations: ▪ Type A - Basic safety standards: basic concepts, principles for design and general aspects. ▪ ▪ Type B - Generic safety standards: one safety aspect ▪ ▪ Example: ISO 12100 - design standards for all machinery Example: NTA 9065: 2012 - air quality Type C - Machine safety standards: detailed requirements 7

Safety Regulations ISO 12100 ▪ Type A - Basic safety standards: basic concepts, principles

Safety Regulations ISO 12100 ▪ Type A - Basic safety standards: basic concepts, principles for design and general aspects ▪ Type B - Generic safety standards: individual safety aspect ▪ Type C - Machine safety standards: detailed requirements System safety level: Catastrophic 8

Incident: Driverless Train in Yokohama ● ● June 1, 2019 Go. A 3 train

Incident: Driverless Train in Yokohama ● ● June 1, 2019 Go. A 3 train Dozen of people injured Cause of Accident: Signal controlling direction by ATO devices on train Demo of Autonomous Train moving backwards 9

Identified Hazards ▪ Failure of Onboard systems ▪ Failure of ATP system due to

Identified Hazards ▪ Failure of Onboard systems ▪ Failure of ATP system due to weak signal strength ▪ Absence of barriers in the road crossings ▪ No proper warning signals at the level crossing ▪ Lack of warning signs for poor visibility on the track due to bad weather conditions like fog ▪ Lack of luminescent warning signs during night 10

Identified Hazards ▪ Failure of Onboard systems ▪ Failure of ATP system due to

Identified Hazards ▪ Failure of Onboard systems ▪ Failure of ATP system due to weak signal strength ▪ Absence of barriers in the road crossings ▪ No proper warning signals at the level crossing ▪ Lack of warning signs for poor visibility on the track due to bad weather conditions like fog ▪ Lack of luminescent warning signs during night 11

Control of Hazard 1. Redesign 2. Safety devices 3. Warning devices 4. Special procedures

Control of Hazard 1. Redesign 2. Safety devices 3. Warning devices 4. Special procedures + training 12

What to control? ▪ Desired: low or medium risk ▪ Reliability ▪ Cost-benefit Example:

What to control? ▪ Desired: low or medium risk ▪ Reliability ▪ Cost-benefit Example: Failure of onboard systems like ATO ▪ Backup ▪ Double check system 13

Safety Culture ▪ Unpredictable human interaction ▪ Training ▪ Desired safety culture level: Optimized

Safety Culture ▪ Unpredictable human interaction ▪ Training ▪ Desired safety culture level: Optimized ▪ Constant monitoring of safety standards and active support from managers is achieved. 14

Questions? 15

Questions? 15