Lyman alpha and energetic particles H escape Allison

  • Slides: 19
Download presentation
Lyman alpha and energetic particles: H escape Allison Youngblood NASA GSFC / USRA

Lyman alpha and energetic particles: H escape Allison Youngblood NASA GSFC / USRA

H escape: responsible for sculpting observed 1. 7 Rsun radius gap Hot sub. Neptune

H escape: responsible for sculpting observed 1. 7 Rsun radius gap Hot sub. Neptune desert Gas-rich Theory predictions from Lopez & Rice (2016): Atmospheric loss Gas-poor low completeness Owen & Wu 2013, 2017 Figure from Fulton et al. Formed gas-poor

Super-Earths Sub-Neptunes Teff = 4700– 6500 K Gap not ruled in or out yet

Super-Earths Sub-Neptunes Teff = 4700– 6500 K Gap not ruled in or out yet for M dwarfs See also Ginzburg et al. 2018 for planet corepowered atmospheric loss. Fulton et al. 2018

Lyman alpha transit of escaping H atmosphere + stellar wind drag Bourrier et al.

Lyman alpha transit of escaping H atmosphere + stellar wind drag Bourrier et al. 2016 Laura Harbach

Bourrier et al. 2016

Bourrier et al. 2016

Thorny issues with precisely measuring Lyman alpha: ISM, geocorona, intrinsic profile shape Jeff Linsky

Thorny issues with precisely measuring Lyman alpha: ISM, geocorona, intrinsic profile shape Jeff Linsky / JILA

Reconstructing the intrinsic Lyα profiles Intrinsic Lyα profile Youngblood et al. 2016 2/23/18 Allison

Reconstructing the intrinsic Lyα profiles Intrinsic Lyα profile Youngblood et al. 2016 2/23/18 Allison Youngblood 8

Reconstructing the intrinsic Lyα profiles Intrinsic Lyα profile Youngblood et al. 2016 2/23/18 Allison

Reconstructing the intrinsic Lyα profiles Intrinsic Lyα profile Youngblood et al. 2016 2/23/18 Allison Youngblood 9

Reconstructing the intrinsic Lyα profiles + N(HI) = 1018 cm-2, b = 12 km/s,

Reconstructing the intrinsic Lyα profiles + N(HI) = 1018 cm-2, b = 12 km/s, D/H = 1. 5 × 10 -5 Observed Lyα profile Youngblood et al. 2016 2/23/18 DI absorption Allison Youngblood HI absorption 10

Reconstructing the intrinsic Lyα profiles Reconstructed F(Lyα) = (3. 9 ± 0. 4) ×

Reconstructing the intrinsic Lyα profiles Reconstructed F(Lyα) = (3. 9 ± 0. 4) × 10 -13 erg cm-2 s-1 Youngblood et al. 2016 2/23/18 Allison Youngblood 11

Reconstructing the intrinsic Lyα profiles high spectral resolution is not feasible for current exoplanet

Reconstructing the intrinsic Lyα profiles high spectral resolution is not feasible for current exoplanet transits of interest Jeff Linsky / JILA 2/23/18 Allison Youngblood 12

Unknown intrinsic profile shapes Solar The Sun’s Lyα profile Network (high B; low opacity)

Unknown intrinsic profile shapes Solar The Sun’s Lyα profile Network (high B; low opacity) Internetwork (low B; high opacity) Solar Lyα selfreversal depends on magnetic field strength and orientation Tian+ 2009 (SOHO/SUMER) See also Curdt+ 2001, Fontenla+ 1988 2/23/18 Allison Youngblood 13

But did we pick the right intrinsic Lyα profile? Kapteyn’s Star, Mg II Youngblood

But did we pick the right intrinsic Lyα profile? Kapteyn’s Star, Mg II Youngblood et al. 2016 2/23/18 Allison Youngblood 14

Directly determine intrinsic Lyα profile from high-RV stars • HST Cycle 25 – PI:

Directly determine intrinsic Lyα profile from high-RV stars • HST Cycle 25 – PI: Youngblood • Selected the nearest stars with high radial velocity • 3 M dwarfs, 1 K dwarf, 1 G dwarf • Elucidate a dependency of self-reversal on spectral type • Reveal information about stellar magnetic fields • Improve accuracy of Lyα reconstructions 2/23/18 Allison Youngblood 15

Directly determine intrinsic Lyα profile from high-RV stars • Lines like Mg II (2796,

Directly determine intrinsic Lyα profile from high-RV stars • Lines like Mg II (2796, 2802 Å) and Ca II (3933, 3968 Å) may also be similar to Lyα • And they are not as affected by the ISM Ca II The Sun: 2/23/18 Allison Youngblood 16

Lyman alpha reconstructions at R~1000 Si III Pineda et al. in prep FUMES Survey

Lyman alpha reconstructions at R~1000 Si III Pineda et al. in prep FUMES Survey G 140 M R~10, 000 E 140 M R~50, 000 E 140 H R~100, 000 Add in as many prior constraints on parameters as possible! (e. g. , Bourrier et al. 2017) • Radial Velocities from other emission lines • Temperature of ISM H I atoms • ISM column density

Extended wings of Lyman alpha • < 5% of the total Lyman alpha flux

Extended wings of Lyman alpha • < 5% of the total Lyman alpha flux • But potentially a significant “continuum” source (e. g. , important for photochemistry) Below the sensitivity of STIS E 140 H, E 140 M, and G 140 M spectra. Detectable with STIS G 140 L (out to ± 5000 km/s) and COS G 130 M (out to ± 1000 km/s) Extends out Youngblood et al. 2016 Pineda et al. in prep

Energetic

Energetic