IMPROVING PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY IN FISH PRODUCTION Merve Demiralay

  • Slides: 1
Download presentation
IMPROVING PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY IN FISH PRODUCTION Merve Demiralay, Raif Usta, Erşan Ük Levent Kandiller,

IMPROVING PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY IN FISH PRODUCTION Merve Demiralay, Raif Usta, Erşan Ük Levent Kandiller, Goran Lesaja, Bahar Turan Burak Mücahitoğlu, Uzay Şentürk, Tuncay Sevinç, Eda Yalçınkaya THE PROBLEM THE COMPANY PINAR BALIK Fish Farming Facility Since Total Area Location Country Production Capacity Web Site Ø High value of FCR, Ø Inefficient production, Ø Lack of integrated monitoring for processes. 1985 48, 500 m² Ildir/Cesme Turkiye FCR LITERATURE REVIEW Ø J. M. Wooldridge, Introductory Econometrics A Modern Approach, 2 nd. ed. , 2002, Thomson Learning Ø Prof. Dr. Levent Kandiller, Statistical Data Analysis, Çankaya University Department of Industrial Engineering, 2007 (Feed Conversion Ratio) 7, 900 tons of seabream&seabass 74 million fry fish www. camli. com. tr REGRESSION MODEL Ø Feed conversion ratio (FCR) is a measure of how well a batch converts feed intake (feed usage) into live weight. FISH PRODUCTION PROCESS 2 years S Factors Affecting FCR SYMPTOMS OF THE PROBLEM N IT C D=d 1+d 2+d 3+d 4 Vary of FCR from Cage to Cage Use of Insufficient Quality of Feed Malnutrition M SYMPTOMS Why FCR ? FCR Value High Mortality and Cannibalism Insufficient Area of Land Space 70% of total production cost is feed cost. Insufficient Area of Marine Space OBJECTIVE Cages Copyright © Department of Industrial Engineering/Yaşar University (2013 -2014) R(R 1, R 2, R 3) Ø Improving production efficiency in fish production, Ø Improving FCR • Current FCR ≈ 2, 4 – 2, 7 • Target FCR = 1, 99 IP IW