Evaluation of Improving Surgical Training Introduction to SQW

  • Slides: 6
Download presentation
Evaluation of Improving Surgical Training Introduction to SQW and overview of our planned approach

Evaluation of Improving Surgical Training Introduction to SQW and overview of our planned approach Friday 5 th April 2019 Lauren Roberts, SQW Director

1 Introduction to SQW Independent research and consultancy organisation Operating for over 35 years

1 Introduction to SQW Independent research and consultancy organisation Operating for over 35 years Approximately 40 staff, across 3 offices (London, Edinburgh, Manchester) Expertise in personalisation and integration, innovation and spatial development Economic, formative and summative assessment expertise Stakeholder engagement expertise Strong credibility and reputation for robust evaluation.

2 Some examples of our evaluation experience Macmillan’s Integrated Cancer Care programme Workforce transformation,

2 Some examples of our evaluation experience Macmillan’s Integrated Cancer Care programme Workforce transformation, recruitment and training programmes BHF’s Cardiac Physiology Trainers SIHED Evaluation ETF – SEND workforce development HEE’s Non-Medical Endoscopist Accelerated Training Programme GEO’s AHP / HSC Returners Evaluation Clinical and healthcare workforce training Early Adopter maternity transformation Secondary care pilots & system transformation UEC Vanguards x 3

3 Evaluation focus Cross-cohort and cross-specialty comparison Explore the counterfactual Explore impacts at trainee,

3 Evaluation focus Cross-cohort and cross-specialty comparison Explore the counterfactual Explore impacts at trainee, trainer, service and programme levels Trainee satisfaction; wider perception of IST Identify any intended / negative consequences IST Trainee progression • Interim and final reports • Engagement with IST Scotland evaluators • Formative findings Supervisory encounter Impact of the EST and the Modern Firm Compare with BAU

Proposed approach Methodology, deliverables and underpinning principles • • Inception meeting Document and data

Proposed approach Methodology, deliverables and underpinning principles • • Inception meeting Document and data review Stakeholder map Scoping interviews Logic modelling Tool design & PID Validation workshop • Monthly highlight reports and calls • 6 mth interim report • June 20 interim report • Dec 21 final report • Validation • Summaries • Data annex • Presentation • Peer reviewed journal publication Collaboration and flexibility Scoping & design Data collection • • Analysis and reporting • Interviews (2 waves per cohort): trainees, trainers & leads 7 case studies Web-based engagement Observations – boot-camp and selection days Analysis of metrics Actionable recommendations Strategic alignment ‘No surprises’ Minimal burden Sensitivity & real-world practicalities

5 Contact details Lauren Roberts Dr. Jo Hutchinson Director Associate Director SQW t. 07747

5 Contact details Lauren Roberts Dr. Jo Hutchinson Director Associate Director SQW t. 07747 273 926 t. 07436 108 312 e. lroberts@sqw. co. uk e. jhutchinson@sqw. co. uk w. www. sqw. co. uk